Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4386151010> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 87 of
87
with 100 items per page.
- W4386151010 endingPage "90" @default.
- W4386151010 startingPage "84" @default.
- W4386151010 abstract "The management decisions regarding gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may differ according to the presence of erosive esophagitis. On the other hand, the availability of upper endoscopy in Indonesia is relatively limited. This study compared the Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ) and the GERD questionnaire (GERDQ) performance in predicting the presence of clinically significant erosive esophagitis and determined the validity and reliability of the Indonesian-translated version of RDQ.Ninety-two adults with GERD suspicion were recruited. All patients completed RDQ and GERDQ. Receiver operating curve analysis was conducted on RDQ and GERDQ to evaluate their performance in discriminating LA GERD B or higher esophagitis from others. The translated RDQ preserved its main structure and was culturally adapted.The patients were 66.3% female and 73.9% Javanese. Only 22 (23.9%) patients presented with LA grade B or higher erosive esophagitis. The RDQ showed a higher AUC than the GERDQ (0.602 vs. 0.589). A cutoff point of 20 was selected for the RDQ with sensitivity and specificity of 73% and 50%, respectively, whereas the optimal cutoff point of GERDQ was 8, with a sensitivity and specificity of 77% and 43%, respectively. The r-value greater than the critical value table (r>0.205, p<0.01) confirmed the construct validity of our translated RDQ. The questionnaire also demonstrated excellent reliability (α=0.900) and moderate similarity with the Indonesian version of GERDQ (κ=0.459, p<0.01).The RDQ is slightly superior to GERDQ in predicting the presence of clinically significant erosive esophagitis (LA grade B or higher). The Indonesian-translated RDQ is valid and reliable." @default.
- W4386151010 created "2023-08-26" @default.
- W4386151010 creator A5019391324 @default.
- W4386151010 creator A5024348699 @default.
- W4386151010 creator A5029464879 @default.
- W4386151010 creator A5054178655 @default.
- W4386151010 creator A5063405665 @default.
- W4386151010 creator A5087659546 @default.
- W4386151010 date "2023-08-25" @default.
- W4386151010 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
- W4386151010 title "Comparison of RDQ and GERDQ for Predicting Erosive Esophagitis in Patients with Typical GERD Symptoms" @default.
- W4386151010 cites W1488360505 @default.
- W4386151010 cites W1969673711 @default.
- W4386151010 cites W2007797593 @default.
- W4386151010 cites W2014040479 @default.
- W4386151010 cites W2017172387 @default.
- W4386151010 cites W2032763021 @default.
- W4386151010 cites W2033867372 @default.
- W4386151010 cites W2046585771 @default.
- W4386151010 cites W2074390870 @default.
- W4386151010 cites W2093515174 @default.
- W4386151010 cites W2106435520 @default.
- W4386151010 cites W2114442699 @default.
- W4386151010 cites W2127395151 @default.
- W4386151010 cites W2129558138 @default.
- W4386151010 cites W2136284624 @default.
- W4386151010 cites W2160341742 @default.
- W4386151010 cites W2507977583 @default.
- W4386151010 cites W2537930573 @default.
- W4386151010 cites W2591504958 @default.
- W4386151010 cites W2738918206 @default.
- W4386151010 cites W2744685332 @default.
- W4386151010 cites W2758889112 @default.
- W4386151010 cites W2761421187 @default.
- W4386151010 cites W2785608288 @default.
- W4386151010 cites W2895840820 @default.
- W4386151010 cites W2901100713 @default.
- W4386151010 cites W3014840414 @default.
- W4386151010 cites W3216394740 @default.
- W4386151010 doi "https://doi.org/10.4166/kjg.2023.027" @default.
- W4386151010 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37621243" @default.
- W4386151010 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
- W4386151010 type Work @default.
- W4386151010 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4386151010 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4386151010 hasAuthorship W4386151010A5019391324 @default.
- W4386151010 hasAuthorship W4386151010A5024348699 @default.
- W4386151010 hasAuthorship W4386151010A5029464879 @default.
- W4386151010 hasAuthorship W4386151010A5054178655 @default.
- W4386151010 hasAuthorship W4386151010A5063405665 @default.
- W4386151010 hasAuthorship W4386151010A5087659546 @default.
- W4386151010 hasBestOaLocation W43861510101 @default.
- W4386151010 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W4386151010 hasConcept C2777014526 @default.
- W4386151010 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
- W4386151010 hasConcept C43270747 @default.
- W4386151010 hasConcept C58471807 @default.
- W4386151010 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4386151010 hasConcept C90924648 @default.
- W4386151010 hasConceptScore W4386151010C126322002 @default.
- W4386151010 hasConceptScore W4386151010C2777014526 @default.
- W4386151010 hasConceptScore W4386151010C2779134260 @default.
- W4386151010 hasConceptScore W4386151010C43270747 @default.
- W4386151010 hasConceptScore W4386151010C58471807 @default.
- W4386151010 hasConceptScore W4386151010C71924100 @default.
- W4386151010 hasConceptScore W4386151010C90924648 @default.
- W4386151010 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W4386151010 hasLocation W43861510101 @default.
- W4386151010 hasLocation W43861510102 @default.
- W4386151010 hasOpenAccess W4386151010 @default.
- W4386151010 hasPrimaryLocation W43861510101 @default.
- W4386151010 hasRelatedWork W2015661160 @default.
- W4386151010 hasRelatedWork W2022311620 @default.
- W4386151010 hasRelatedWork W2141093495 @default.
- W4386151010 hasRelatedWork W2356299640 @default.
- W4386151010 hasRelatedWork W2381168924 @default.
- W4386151010 hasRelatedWork W2387679427 @default.
- W4386151010 hasRelatedWork W2783568912 @default.
- W4386151010 hasRelatedWork W2992861500 @default.
- W4386151010 hasRelatedWork W3118258997 @default.
- W4386151010 hasRelatedWork W4381158211 @default.
- W4386151010 hasVolume "82" @default.
- W4386151010 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4386151010 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4386151010 workType "article" @default.