FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4386203048> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4386203048 endingPage "10" @default.
• W4386203048 startingPage "1" @default.
• W4386203048 abstract "No AccessEngineering NotesBounds on Relative Distance in the J2 ProblemTao NieTao Nie https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7134-1791Beijing Institute of Technology, 100081 Beijing, People’s Republic of China*Associate Professor, Key Laboratory of Autonomous Navigation and Control for Deep Space Exploration, School of Aerospace Engineering; .Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:27 Aug 2023https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G007579SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Reiland N., Rosengren A. J., Malhotra R. and Bombardelli C., “Assessing and Minimizing Collisions in Satellite Mega-Constellations,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 67, No. 11, 2021, pp. 3755–3774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.01.010 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[2] Brouwer D., “Solution of the Problem of Artificial Satellite Theory Without Drag,” Astronomical Journal, Vol. 64, Nov. 1959, pp. 378–397. https://doi.org/10.1086/107958 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[3] Clohessy W. and Wiltshire R., “Terminal Guidance System for Satellite Rendezvous,” Journal of the Aerospace Sciences, Vol. 27, No. 9, 1960, pp. 653–658. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.8704 LinkGoogle Scholar[4] Lawden D. F., Optimal Trajectories for Space Navigation, Butterworths, London, 1963, pp. 75–76. Google Scholar[5] Tschauner J. and Hempel P., “Rendezvous zu einem in elliptischer Bahn umlaufenden Ziel,” Astronautica Acta, Vol. 11, No. 2, 1965, pp. 104–109. Google Scholar[6] Schweighart S. A. and Sedwick R. J., “High-Fidelity Linearized J2 Model for Satellite Formation Flight,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 25, No. 6, 2002, pp. 1073–1080. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4986 LinkGoogle Scholar[7] Gim D.-W. and Alfriend K. T., “State Transition Matrix of Relative Motion for the Perturbed Noncircular Reference Orbit,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 26, No. 6, 2003, pp. 956–971. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.6924 LinkGoogle Scholar[8] Gim D.-W. and Alfriend K. T., “Satellite Relative Motion Using Differential Equinoctial Elements,” Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, Vol. 92, No. 4, 2005, pp. 295–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-004-1799-0 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[9] Alfriend K. T., Yan H. and Vadali S. R., “Nonlinear Considerations in Satellite Formation Flying,” AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 2002-4741, 2002. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2002-4741 Google Scholar[10] Sullivan J., Grimberg S. and D’Amico S., “Comprehensive Survey and Assessment of Spacecraft Relative Motion Dynamics Models,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 40, No. 8, 2017, pp. 1837–1859. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002309 LinkGoogle Scholar[11] Kholshevnikov K. V. and Vassiliev N. N., “On the Distance Function Between Two Keplerian Elliptic Orbits,” Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, Vol. 75, No. 2, 1999, pp. 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008312521428 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[12] Kholshevnikov K. V. and Vassiliev N. N., “Natural Metrics in the Spaces of Elliptic Orbits,” Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, Vol. 89, No. 2, 2004, pp. 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CELE.0000034504.41897.ac CrossrefGoogle Scholar[13] Gurfil P. and Kholshevnikov K. V., “Manifolds and Metrics in the Relative Spacecraft Motion Problem,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2006, pp. 1004–1010. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.15531 LinkGoogle Scholar[14] Dang Z., Wang Z. and Zhang Y., “Modeling and Analysis of the Bounds of Periodical Satellite Relative Motion,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 37, No. 6, 2014, pp. 1984–1998. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G000259 LinkGoogle Scholar[15] Sengupta P., Vadali S. R. and Alfriend K. T., “Averaged Relative Motion and Applications to Formation Flight Near Perturbed Orbits,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 31, No. 2, 2008, pp. 258–272. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.30620 LinkGoogle Scholar[16] Nie T., Gurfil P. and Zhang S., “Analytical Conditions for Bounded Mean Inter-Satellite Distances in the J2 Problem,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 41, No. 10, 2018, pp. 2144–2162. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G003482 LinkGoogle Scholar[17] Battin R. H., An Introduction to the Mathematics and Methods of Astrodynamics, AIAA, Reston, VA, 1999, pp. 200–220. Google Scholar[18] Vallado D. A., Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications, Vol. 12, Springer Science & Business Media, New York, 2001, pp. 474–530. Google Scholar[19] Rees E., “Graphical Discussion of the Roots of a Quartic Equation,” American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 29, No. 2, 1922, pp. 51–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.1922.11986100 Google Scholar Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails What's Popular Articles in Advance CrossmarkInformationCopyright © 2023 by Tao Nie. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the eISSN 1533-3884 to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsAeronauticsAerospace SciencesAircraft Collision Avoidance SystemsApplied MathematicsAstrodynamicsAstronauticsAviationAviation SafetyGeneral PhysicsMathematical AnalysisSpace DebrisSpace Orbit KeywordsNodal PrecessionSpace DebrisMathematical AnalysisRelative DistanceCollision Risk Modeling ToolMinimum DistanceJ2 PerturbationAcknowledgmentThis work was supported by the Beijing Institute of Technology Research Fund Program for Young Scholars grant 6120210288.PDF Received4 March 2023Accepted31 July 2023Published online27 August 2023" @default.
• W4386203048 created "2023-08-28" @default.
• W4386203048 creator A5018078098 @default.
• W4386203048 date "2023-08-27" @default.
• W4386203048 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W4386203048 title "Bounds on Relative Distance in the J2 Problem" @default.
• W4386203048 cites W141907071 @default.
• W4386203048 cites W1516952899 @default.
• W4386203048 cites W1974478384 @default.
• W4386203048 cites W1982970174 @default.
• W4386203048 cites W1987711364 @default.
• W4386203048 cites W2011654308 @default.
• W4386203048 cites W2029689537 @default.
• W4386203048 cites W2035487075 @default.
• W4386203048 cites W2084277266 @default.
• W4386203048 cites W2093763585 @default.
• W4386203048 cites W2318829638 @default.
• W4386203048 cites W2606760511 @default.
• W4386203048 cites W2883608196 @default.
• W4386203048 cites W3004290985 @default.
• W4386203048 doi "https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g007579" @default.
• W4386203048 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4386203048 type Work @default.
• W4386203048 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4386203048 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4386203048 hasAuthorship W4386203048A5018078098 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConcept C1276947 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConcept C146978453 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConcept C167740415 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConcept C178802073 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConcept C191935318 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConcept C19269812 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConcept C2778304055 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConcept C2778572836 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConcept C2779968344 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConcept C29829512 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConcept C42475967 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConceptScore W4386203048C111919701 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConceptScore W4386203048C121332964 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConceptScore W4386203048C127413603 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConceptScore W4386203048C1276947 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConceptScore W4386203048C146978453 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConceptScore W4386203048C154945302 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConceptScore W4386203048C167740415 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConceptScore W4386203048C17744445 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConceptScore W4386203048C178802073 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConceptScore W4386203048C191935318 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConceptScore W4386203048C19269812 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConceptScore W4386203048C199539241 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConceptScore W4386203048C2778304055 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConceptScore W4386203048C2778572836 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConceptScore W4386203048C2779968344 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConceptScore W4386203048C29829512 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConceptScore W4386203048C33923547 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConceptScore W4386203048C41008148 @default.
• W4386203048 hasConceptScore W4386203048C42475967 @default.
• W4386203048 hasFunder F4320327514 @default.
• W4386203048 hasLocation W43862030481 @default.
• W4386203048 hasOpenAccess W4386203048 @default.
• W4386203048 hasPrimaryLocation W43862030481 @default.
• W4386203048 hasRelatedWork W1573209930 @default.
• W4386203048 hasRelatedWork W2018477587 @default.
• W4386203048 hasRelatedWork W2240832559 @default.
• W4386203048 hasRelatedWork W2335579742 @default.
• W4386203048 hasRelatedWork W2354156652 @default.
• W4386203048 hasRelatedWork W2366303246 @default.
• W4386203048 hasRelatedWork W2368116934 @default.
• W4386203048 hasRelatedWork W2375231327 @default.
• W4386203048 hasRelatedWork W3034504904 @default.
• W4386203048 hasRelatedWork W604832255 @default.
• W4386203048 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4386203048 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4386203048 workType "article" @default.