FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4386232535> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4386232535 endingPage "100457" @default.
• W4386232535 startingPage "100457" @default.
• W4386232535 abstract "To compare the effectiveness of Peyton’s four-step approach for teaching resuscitation skills with alternative approaches. For this systematic review, we followed the PICOST format (population, intervention, comparison, outcome, study design, timeframe) using Peyton’s four-step approach as the standard. We included all studies analyzing skills training related to resuscitation and First Aid in any educational setting. Eligible were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies (non-randomized controlled trials, interrupted time series, controlled before-and-after studies, cohort studies, published conference abstracts, and case series where n ≥ 5). We excluded unpublished results (e.g. trial protocols), commentaries, editorials, reviews. Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, ERIC, CINAHL, and Cochrane were searched from inception until November 10, 2020 (updated November 25, 2022) for publications in all languages as long as there was an English abstract. Titles and abstracts of the papers retrieved were screened, and eligible publications were analysed in full text. From the final set of papers, data were extracted into a spreadsheet, subsequently risk of bias assessment was performed (using RoB2 and ROBINS-I), and the certainty of evidence (using GRADE) for each paper was assessed. Screening of studies, data extraction, risk-of-bias assessment, and assessment of certainty of evidence were all performed by two independent researchers. This review was conducted in adherence with PRISMA standards and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023377398). Overall, the search identified 2,574 studies from which 17 were included in the final analysis (14 RCTs, and 3 non-RCTs). The studies involved a total of 2,906 participants from various populations (from lay persons to health care professionals) and analysed nine different resuscitation skills being taught (ranging from chest compressions to needle cricotomy). The alternative teaching approaches ranged from two-steps to five-steps with various modifications of single steps. High methodological and clinical heterogeneity precluded a meta-analysis from being conducted. The risk of bias assessment showed considerable variation between the studies ranging from ‘low’ to ‘serious’. Across all studies, certainty of evidence was rated as very low due to imprecision and inconsistency. Overall, 14 out of 17 studies showed no difference in skill acquisition or retention when comparing Peyton’s four steps to other stepwise approaches. Very low certainty evidence suggest that Peyton’s four-step approach was not more effective in resuscitation skills training compared to alternative approaches. None." @default.
• W4386232535 created "2023-08-29" @default.
• W4386232535 creator A5001197447 @default.
• W4386232535 creator A5012751492 @default.
• W4386232535 creator A5052886806 @default.
• W4386232535 creator A5053615849 @default.
• W4386232535 creator A5066273011 @default.
• W4386232535 creator A5073811795 @default.
• W4386232535 date "2023-12-01" @default.
• W4386232535 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W4386232535 title "Stepwise approach to skills teaching in resuscitation: A systematic review" @default.
• W4386232535 cites W1607868113 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W1972056366 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W1976428933 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W1982383095 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W2029217034 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W2031307275 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W2054142903 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W2059333369 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W2068386734 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W2085487772 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W2085813740 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W2100685600 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W2105739158 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W2110645213 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W2129707325 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W2134275520 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W2147820799 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W2171469175 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W2329267618 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W2333712723 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W2403364031 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W2511179051 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W2531269403 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W2560438049 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W2600289216 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W2609346441 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W2618413345 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W2736152987 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W2799315570 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W2808460831 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W2896140110 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W2948812997 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W2956637455 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W2970684805 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W2990648940 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W3004135539 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W3014602228 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W3031213638 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W3092122269 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W3110324878 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W3114747318 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W3118615836 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W3144810571 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W3196053768 @default.
• W4386232535 cites W4280496830 @default.
• W4386232535 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100457" @default.
• W4386232535 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37674547" @default.
• W4386232535 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4386232535 type Work @default.
• W4386232535 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4386232535 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4386232535 hasAuthorship W4386232535A5001197447 @default.
• W4386232535 hasAuthorship W4386232535A5012751492 @default.
• W4386232535 hasAuthorship W4386232535A5052886806 @default.
• W4386232535 hasAuthorship W4386232535A5053615849 @default.
• W4386232535 hasAuthorship W4386232535A5066273011 @default.
• W4386232535 hasAuthorship W4386232535A5073811795 @default.
• W4386232535 hasBestOaLocation W43862325351 @default.
• W4386232535 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W4386232535 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4386232535 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4386232535 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4386232535 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W4386232535 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4386232535 hasConcept C27415008 @default.
• W4386232535 hasConcept C2777466982 @default.
• W4386232535 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W4386232535 hasConcept C2779549880 @default.
• W4386232535 hasConcept C2781145037 @default.
• W4386232535 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W4386232535 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W4386232535 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4386232535 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W4386232535 hasConceptScore W4386232535C118552586 @default.
• W4386232535 hasConceptScore W4386232535C126322002 @default.
• W4386232535 hasConceptScore W4386232535C168563851 @default.
• W4386232535 hasConceptScore W4386232535C17744445 @default.
• W4386232535 hasConceptScore W4386232535C189708586 @default.
• W4386232535 hasConceptScore W4386232535C199539241 @default.
• W4386232535 hasConceptScore W4386232535C27415008 @default.
• W4386232535 hasConceptScore W4386232535C2777466982 @default.
• W4386232535 hasConceptScore W4386232535C2779473830 @default.
• W4386232535 hasConceptScore W4386232535C2779549880 @default.
• W4386232535 hasConceptScore W4386232535C2781145037 @default.
• W4386232535 hasConceptScore W4386232535C2908647359 @default.
• W4386232535 hasConceptScore W4386232535C512399662 @default.
• W4386232535 hasConceptScore W4386232535C71924100 @default.

• next