FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4386252603> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4386252603 abstract "Introduction Patella fracture fixations were traditionally done using metal tension band wiring techniques. However, complications associated with metallic implants causing soft tissue irritation are not infrequent. Since 1998, there have been emerging case reports and series reporting the use of non-metallic implants, such as braided sutures, in the fixation of patella fractures 3. However, there is a limited clinical study on a direct comparison between metal and suture fixation in patella fractures. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome of all-suture fixation in patella fractures and to compare all-suture and metal fixation in mid-pole fractures. Materials and method A total number of 50 patients with operated fracture patella were retrospectively reviewed in a 2.5-year period. Primary outcomes included operation time, time for fracture union and postoperative knee function. Secondary outcomes include complications, need for secondary operations due to prominent implants, infection or loss of fixation. Results There was no statistically significant difference concerning time for fracture union, operation time and postoperative functional knee score between the three fixation methods. The rate of secondary operations was higher in the hybrid group (7 out of 11, 63.6%) and metal group (7 out of 13, 53.8%), and was lowest in an all-suture group (0 out of 28, 0%). Metal implant breakage and soft tissue irritation were the main reasons for secondary operations, which was significantly lower in the all-suture group ( p < 0.0003). Subgroup analysis for mid-pole patella fractures showed similar results in which all primary outcomes showed no statistically significant difference, while the need for secondary operations was higher in the metal group ( p < 0.003). Conclusion All-suture fixation for patella fractures is a feasible option not limited to distal pole fractures. In our series, this technique achieved similar outcomes when compared with traditional metal implants, with lower rates of secondary operations, and could be safely employed in mid-pole fractures as well." @default.
• W4386252603 created "2023-08-30" @default.
• W4386252603 creator A5078982604 @default.
• W4386252603 creator A5092816007 @default.
• W4386252603 date "2023-08-28" @default.
• W4386252603 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W4386252603 title "Fixation of patella fracture with non-metallic implant" @default.
• W4386252603 cites W1983128738 @default.
• W4386252603 cites W1988019559 @default.
• W4386252603 cites W2029834563 @default.
• W4386252603 cites W2076840912 @default.
• W4386252603 cites W2095528377 @default.
• W4386252603 cites W2154947617 @default.
• W4386252603 cites W2159524705 @default.
• W4386252603 cites W2178558007 @default.
• W4386252603 cites W2197221807 @default.
• W4386252603 cites W2298877369 @default.
• W4386252603 cites W2413914580 @default.
• W4386252603 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/22104917231197234" @default.
• W4386252603 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4386252603 type Work @default.
• W4386252603 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4386252603 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4386252603 hasAuthorship W4386252603A5078982604 @default.
• W4386252603 hasAuthorship W4386252603A5092816007 @default.
• W4386252603 hasBestOaLocation W43862526031 @default.
• W4386252603 hasConcept C136948725 @default.
• W4386252603 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4386252603 hasConcept C146249460 @default.
• W4386252603 hasConcept C2777327002 @default.
• W4386252603 hasConcept C2778614594 @default.
• W4386252603 hasConcept C2780368125 @default.
• W4386252603 hasConcept C2780498440 @default.
• W4386252603 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
• W4386252603 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W4386252603 hasConcept C68312169 @default.
• W4386252603 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4386252603 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W4386252603 hasConceptScore W4386252603C136948725 @default.
• W4386252603 hasConceptScore W4386252603C141071460 @default.
• W4386252603 hasConceptScore W4386252603C146249460 @default.
• W4386252603 hasConceptScore W4386252603C2777327002 @default.
• W4386252603 hasConceptScore W4386252603C2778614594 @default.
• W4386252603 hasConceptScore W4386252603C2780368125 @default.
• W4386252603 hasConceptScore W4386252603C2780498440 @default.
• W4386252603 hasConceptScore W4386252603C2781411149 @default.
• W4386252603 hasConceptScore W4386252603C2908647359 @default.
• W4386252603 hasConceptScore W4386252603C68312169 @default.
• W4386252603 hasConceptScore W4386252603C71924100 @default.
• W4386252603 hasConceptScore W4386252603C99454951 @default.
• W4386252603 hasLocation W43862526031 @default.
• W4386252603 hasOpenAccess W4386252603 @default.
• W4386252603 hasPrimaryLocation W43862526031 @default.
• W4386252603 hasRelatedWork W2088228661 @default.
• W4386252603 hasRelatedWork W2364441182 @default.
• W4386252603 hasRelatedWork W2387384226 @default.
• W4386252603 hasRelatedWork W2535422347 @default.
• W4386252603 hasRelatedWork W2650738802 @default.
• W4386252603 hasRelatedWork W3034732434 @default.
• W4386252603 hasRelatedWork W3120215526 @default.
• W4386252603 hasRelatedWork W3138067110 @default.
• W4386252603 hasRelatedWork W3216774566 @default.
• W4386252603 hasRelatedWork W4301489211 @default.
• W4386252603 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4386252603 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4386252603 workType "article" @default.