FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4386262511> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4386262511 abstract "Background Surgical device representatives (SDRs) traditionally receive product training through didactic and hands-on learning. Immersive virtual reality (IVR) training effectiveness and user perceptions has not been studied in this population. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the learning efficiency of IVR for SDRs using a revision total knee arthroplasty system, determine SDR views on the use of IVR for training, and to perform a cost analysis of IVR training compared to traditional means. Methods A cross-sectional study of SDRs attending an anual sales meeting of a single orthopaedic implant company completed a revision total knee arthroplasty module using the Precision OS IVR System after a 1-hour traditional didactic lecture and small-group discussion training format. Immersive VR performance was tracked by the Precision OS software including repetitions, completion times, and performance measured using a previously validated performance metric, the Precision Score. An eight question survey was collected after IVR module completion. Results Two-hundred eighty-six SDRs completed over 1048 module repetitions for an average of approximately 4 module completions per SDR. The cumulative IVR training time was 18.3 minutes (SD 8.5). There was a high rate of critical injuries (n=458, 74%) measured including the medial and lateral collateral ligaments, popliteal artery, and amount of bony resection. The Precision Score had strong, inverse correlation to these injuries and were tracked over module repetitions. Two-hundred forty-five SDRs completed the post-training survery for a response rate of 86%. Most participants (91%) preferred IVR to standard training formats. Almost all participants (99%) intended to use their IVR learning in their current roles, and 99% felt the use of IVR was relevant to their roles. Similarly, 99% would recommend IVR training to others. The cumulative direct costs of IVR training compared to traditional didactic, in-person training formats for SDRs was 2.8x less costly, a lower bound as this did not account for lost productivity. Conclusion Immersive VR training is able to assess and track SDR learner performance and is valued by SDRs greater than traditional training formats. The cost of incorporating this technology is 2.8x less than current didactic and in-person learning formats. This is the first study of its kind to assess the use of IVR in the SDR population." @default.
• W4386262511 created "2023-08-30" @default.
• W4386262511 creator A5052676318 @default.
• W4386262511 creator A5078604103 @default.
• W4386262511 creator A5085273308 @default.
• W4386262511 date "2022-07-13" @default.
• W4386262511 modified "2023-10-05" @default.
• W4386262511 title "Surgical Device Representatives Preference for Experiential Learning via Immersive Virtual Reality" @default.
• W4386262511 cites W1760893596 @default.
• W4386262511 cites W1975691516 @default.
• W4386262511 cites W2612173101 @default.
• W4386262511 cites W2998049926 @default.
• W4386262511 cites W2998754069 @default.
• W4386262511 cites W3030493510 @default.
• W4386262511 cites W3107976781 @default.
• W4386262511 cites W3113444398 @default.
• W4386262511 cites W3155676163 @default.
• W4386262511 cites W3183250866 @default.
• W4386262511 cites W3197411205 @default.
• W4386262511 cites W3206017707 @default.
• W4386262511 cites W4256354242 @default.
• W4386262511 doi "https://doi.org/10.60118/001c.36131" @default.
• W4386262511 hasPublicationYear "2022" @default.
• W4386262511 type Work @default.
• W4386262511 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4386262511 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4386262511 hasAuthorship W4386262511A5052676318 @default.
• W4386262511 hasAuthorship W4386262511A5078604103 @default.
• W4386262511 hasAuthorship W4386262511A5085273308 @default.
• W4386262511 hasBestOaLocation W43862625111 @default.
• W4386262511 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W4386262511 hasConcept C194969405 @default.
• W4386262511 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4386262511 hasConcept C49774154 @default.
• W4386262511 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4386262511 hasConceptScore W4386262511C154945302 @default.
• W4386262511 hasConceptScore W4386262511C194969405 @default.
• W4386262511 hasConceptScore W4386262511C41008148 @default.
• W4386262511 hasConceptScore W4386262511C49774154 @default.
• W4386262511 hasConceptScore W4386262511C71924100 @default.
• W4386262511 hasLocation W43862625111 @default.
• W4386262511 hasOpenAccess W4386262511 @default.
• W4386262511 hasPrimaryLocation W43862625111 @default.
• W4386262511 hasRelatedWork W2030250808 @default.
• W4386262511 hasRelatedWork W2355862304 @default.
• W4386262511 hasRelatedWork W2356108042 @default.
• W4386262511 hasRelatedWork W2376796979 @default.
• W4386262511 hasRelatedWork W2379285345 @default.
• W4386262511 hasRelatedWork W2379418341 @default.
• W4386262511 hasRelatedWork W2380054981 @default.
• W4386262511 hasRelatedWork W2393110101 @default.
• W4386262511 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W4386262511 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W4386262511 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4386262511 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4386262511 workType "article" @default.