FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4386329173> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4386329173 endingPage "e19532" @default.
• W4386329173 startingPage "e19532" @default.
• W4386329173 abstract "Despite a long period of scholarly interest in Feng Shui, there has been no systematic review of this subject. The objective of this study was, therefore, to conduct a systematic review of empirical and quantitative Feng Shui journal articles written in Chinese or English to shed light on the nature of Feng Shui. This study identifies both existing empirical and quantitative studies of Feng Shui and directions for further research. It is the first to provide a synthesis of empirical and quantitative findings on the specific outcomes of Feng Shui, and more importantly, to explore its reliability and validity. We searched four databases, two in Chinese (Taiwan Periodical Literature and WANFANG DATA) and two in English (Web of Science and SCOPUS), and reviewed 36 articles following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA 2009). The eligibility criteria were: (1) any kind of participants or study samples; (2) any Feng Shui-related intervention; (3) comparators belonging to the same study samples or between different study samples; (4) the outcome of any empirical and quantitative measurement of Feng Shui; and (5) any study design except for qualitative studies. We used the Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Tools to analyze the research quality of the included articles. We found that Feng Shui was associated with housing prices in societies influenced by Chinese culture. Other findings suggested that: (1) Feng Shui was associated with the decisions of house-buyers growing up in societies influenced by Chinese culture; (2) Feng Shui forests had greater habitat diversity than other forests in China; (3) Feng Shui environments in Asia had more comfortable wind fields than non-Feng Shui settings; (4) in Asia, Feng Shui was related to sunlight; (5) Feng Shui had good reliability; and (6) Feng Shui was valid with respect to environmental features but its influence on humans has not been determined. We therefore conclude that Feng Shui is neither a superstition nor a science. Given that the research quality of the included articles was less than ideal and the number of each specific outcome and their samples were also limited, their findings should be interpreted with caution. We look forward to more good quality empirical studies of Feng Shui in the future, particularly those involving de facto field experiments recruiting non-Asian participants to provide further insights into the quasi-science of Feng Shui. (PRISMA 2009 Item 2)." @default.
• W4386329173 created "2023-09-01" @default.
• W4386329173 creator A5091365959 @default.
• W4386329173 date "2023-09-01" @default.
• W4386329173 modified "2023-10-11" @default.
• W4386329173 title "Empirical and quantitative studies of feng shui: A systematic review (PRISMA 2009 item 1)" @default.
• W4386329173 cites W1967156733 @default.
• W4386329173 cites W1978584518 @default.
• W4386329173 cites W1983329342 @default.
• W4386329173 cites W1995057368 @default.
• W4386329173 cites W2055697386 @default.
• W4386329173 cites W2057600678 @default.
• W4386329173 cites W2071962517 @default.
• W4386329173 cites W2095527676 @default.
• W4386329173 cites W2098868197 @default.
• W4386329173 cites W2108696783 @default.
• W4386329173 cites W2110448405 @default.
• W4386329173 cites W2123971225 @default.
• W4386329173 cites W2125057086 @default.
• W4386329173 cites W2138664283 @default.
• W4386329173 cites W2144969491 @default.
• W4386329173 cites W2275737843 @default.
• W4386329173 cites W2331393505 @default.
• W4386329173 cites W2491186260 @default.
• W4386329173 cites W2755526327 @default.
• W4386329173 cites W2767641927 @default.
• W4386329173 cites W2797330596 @default.
• W4386329173 cites W2884633725 @default.
• W4386329173 cites W2892752814 @default.
• W4386329173 cites W2915250610 @default.
• W4386329173 cites W2973052639 @default.
• W4386329173 cites W2979699831 @default.
• W4386329173 cites W2980135377 @default.
• W4386329173 cites W2980274831 @default.
• W4386329173 cites W2980708980 @default.
• W4386329173 cites W2991792334 @default.
• W4386329173 cites W4294215472 @default.
• W4386329173 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19532" @default.
• W4386329173 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37809664" @default.
• W4386329173 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4386329173 type Work @default.
• W4386329173 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4386329173 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4386329173 hasAuthorship W4386329173A5091365959 @default.
• W4386329173 hasBestOaLocation W43863291731 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConcept C120936955 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConcept C152541439 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConcept C189708586 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConcept C191935318 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConcept C2777855551 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConcept C41555743 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConcept C83867959 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConcept C95986675 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConceptScore W4386329173C105795698 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConceptScore W4386329173C120936955 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConceptScore W4386329173C126322002 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConceptScore W4386329173C142724271 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConceptScore W4386329173C144024400 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConceptScore W4386329173C152541439 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConceptScore W4386329173C15744967 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConceptScore W4386329173C161191863 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConceptScore W4386329173C17744445 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConceptScore W4386329173C185592680 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConceptScore W4386329173C189708586 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConceptScore W4386329173C191935318 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConceptScore W4386329173C199539241 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConceptScore W4386329173C204787440 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConceptScore W4386329173C2777855551 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConceptScore W4386329173C2779473830 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConceptScore W4386329173C33923547 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConceptScore W4386329173C36289849 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConceptScore W4386329173C41008148 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConceptScore W4386329173C41555743 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConceptScore W4386329173C43617362 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConceptScore W4386329173C71924100 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConceptScore W4386329173C83867959 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConceptScore W4386329173C95190672 @default.
• W4386329173 hasConceptScore W4386329173C95986675 @default.
• W4386329173 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W4386329173 hasLocation W43863291731 @default.
• W4386329173 hasLocation W43863291732 @default.

• next