Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4386467416> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W4386467416 abstract "We developed a 4-dimensional dynamic dose (4DDD) calculation model for proton pencil beam scanning (PBS). This model incorporates the spill start time for all energies and uses the remaining irradiated spot time model instead of irradiated spot time logs. This study aimed to validate the calculation accuracy of a log file-based 4DDD model by comparing it with dose measurements performed under free-breathing conditions, thereby serving as an alternative approach to the conventional log file-based system.Three cubic verification plans were created using a heterogeneous block phantom; these plans were created using 10 phase 4D-CT datasets of the phantom. The CIRS dynamic platform was used to simulate motion with amplitudes of 2.5, 3.75, and 5.0 mm. These plans consisted of eight- and two-layered rescanning techniques. The lateral profiles were measured using a 2D ionization chamber array (2D-array) and EBT3 Gafchromic films at four starting phases, including three sinusoidal curves (periods of 3, 4, and 6 s) and a representative patient curve during actual treatment. 4DDDs were calculated using in-house scripting that assigned a time stamp to each spot and performed dose accumulation using deformable image registration. Furthermore, to evaluate the impact of parameter selection on our 4DDD model calculations, simulations were performed assuming a ±10% change in irradiation time stamp (0.8 ± 0.08 s) and spot scan speed. We evaluated the 2D gamma index and the absolute point doses between the calculated values and the measurements.The 2D-array measurements revealed that the gamma scores for the static plans (no motion) and 4DDD plans exceeded 97.5% and 93.9% at 3%/3 mm, respectively. The average gamma score of the 4DDD plans was at least 96.1%. When using EBT3 films, the gamma scores of the 4DDD model exceeded 92.4% and 98.7% at 2%/2 mm and 3%/3 mm, respectively. Regarding the 4DDD point dose differences, more than 95% of the dose regions exhibited discrepancies within ±5.0% for 97.7% of the total points across all plans. The spot time assignment accuracy of our 4DDD model was acceptable even with ±10% sensitivity. However, the accuracy of the scan speed, when varied within ±10% sensitivity, was not acceptable (minimum gamma scores of 82.6% and maximum dose difference of 12.9%).Our 4DDD calculations under free-breathing conditions using amplitudes of less than 5.0 mm were in good agreement with the measurements regardless of the starting phases, breathing curve patterns (between 3 and 6 s periods), and varying numbers of layered rescanning. The proposed system allows us to evaluate actual irradiated doses in various breathing periods, amplitudes, and starting phases, even on PBS machines without the ability to record spot logs." @default.
- W4386467416 created "2023-09-07" @default.
- W4386467416 creator A5004406820 @default.
- W4386467416 creator A5043860090 @default.
- W4386467416 creator A5061483126 @default.
- W4386467416 creator A5086132373 @default.
- W4386467416 date "2023-09-06" @default.
- W4386467416 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W4386467416 title "Experimental validation of a 4D dynamic dose calculation model for proton pencil beam scanning without spot time stamp considering free‐breathing motion" @default.
- W4386467416 cites W1967121735 @default.
- W4386467416 cites W2005152400 @default.
- W4386467416 cites W2009537834 @default.
- W4386467416 cites W2052562810 @default.
- W4386467416 cites W2055233491 @default.
- W4386467416 cites W2078763031 @default.
- W4386467416 cites W2085956509 @default.
- W4386467416 cites W2130957275 @default.
- W4386467416 cites W2133147741 @default.
- W4386467416 cites W2145944546 @default.
- W4386467416 cites W2163329967 @default.
- W4386467416 cites W2398973877 @default.
- W4386467416 cites W2525319473 @default.
- W4386467416 cites W2559816654 @default.
- W4386467416 cites W2591250361 @default.
- W4386467416 cites W2606235951 @default.
- W4386467416 cites W2616226761 @default.
- W4386467416 cites W2740417005 @default.
- W4386467416 cites W2747840560 @default.
- W4386467416 cites W2792606653 @default.
- W4386467416 cites W2883352136 @default.
- W4386467416 cites W2907953456 @default.
- W4386467416 cites W3011226734 @default.
- W4386467416 cites W3089060410 @default.
- W4386467416 cites W3173752307 @default.
- W4386467416 cites W4206937105 @default.
- W4386467416 cites W4220807543 @default.
- W4386467416 cites W4309889730 @default.
- W4386467416 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.16725" @default.
- W4386467416 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37672227" @default.
- W4386467416 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
- W4386467416 type Work @default.
- W4386467416 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4386467416 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4386467416 hasAuthorship W4386467416A5004406820 @default.
- W4386467416 hasAuthorship W4386467416A5043860090 @default.
- W4386467416 hasAuthorship W4386467416A5061483126 @default.
- W4386467416 hasAuthorship W4386467416A5086132373 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConcept C104293457 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConcept C134949993 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConcept C145148216 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConcept C151770136 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConcept C168834538 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConcept C198291218 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConcept C22679943 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConcept C2775881188 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConcept C2779244869 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConcept C2780944729 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConcept C44154836 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConcept C75088862 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConceptScore W4386467416C104293457 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConceptScore W4386467416C105795698 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConceptScore W4386467416C120665830 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConceptScore W4386467416C121332964 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConceptScore W4386467416C134949993 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConceptScore W4386467416C145148216 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConceptScore W4386467416C151770136 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConceptScore W4386467416C168834538 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConceptScore W4386467416C192562407 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConceptScore W4386467416C198291218 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConceptScore W4386467416C22679943 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConceptScore W4386467416C2775881188 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConceptScore W4386467416C2779244869 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConceptScore W4386467416C2780944729 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConceptScore W4386467416C2989005 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConceptScore W4386467416C33923547 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConceptScore W4386467416C41008148 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConceptScore W4386467416C44154836 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConceptScore W4386467416C62520636 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConceptScore W4386467416C71924100 @default.
- W4386467416 hasConceptScore W4386467416C75088862 @default.
- W4386467416 hasLocation W43864674161 @default.
- W4386467416 hasLocation W43864674162 @default.
- W4386467416 hasOpenAccess W4386467416 @default.
- W4386467416 hasPrimaryLocation W43864674161 @default.
- W4386467416 hasRelatedWork W1645520115 @default.
- W4386467416 hasRelatedWork W2081412203 @default.
- W4386467416 hasRelatedWork W2464990297 @default.
- W4386467416 hasRelatedWork W2725799848 @default.
- W4386467416 hasRelatedWork W2756967272 @default.
- W4386467416 hasRelatedWork W2888254710 @default.
- W4386467416 hasRelatedWork W2904604170 @default.