FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4386483257> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4386483257 abstract "Abstract Background Preoperative planning is generally performed to simulate the process of reduction as well as to determine the size and placement of implants in patients undergoing distal radius fracture surgery. We previously described a three-dimensional (3D) digital preoperative planning system for the osteosynthesis of distal radius fractures, and we have developed a novel intraoperative referencing system that superimposes preoperative planning (such as plate position and length) onto fluoroscopic images during surgery; however, its efficacy has not been evaluated compared with conventional planning and surgery. Questions/purposes Does use of a novel intraoperative referencing system result in (1) better Mayo wrist scores at 3 and 6 months after surgery and (2) less loss of reduction in terms of ulnar variance, palmar tilt, and radial inclination on plain radiographs taken 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery compared with conventional preoperative planning? Methods Between April 2014 and October 2021, we treated 294 patients with open reduction and volar plate fixation for distal radius fractures. Of 294 patients, 65% (191) underwent surgery using either conventional preoperative planning or a novel intraoperative referencing system. The remaining patients were excluded because they were younger than 18 years, they had some missing medical records related to the clinical outcomes, or they had a previous history of upper extremity injuries. During that time, we generally treated fractures with volar plates when there was: more than 2 mm of stepoff/gap in the articular surface, a dorsal tilt more than 15°, radial inclination less than 15°, or radial shortening more than 5 mm. Generally, we used a flexor carpi radialis approach. In some patients who had dorsal fragments, we added a dorsal approach. At that time, we were developing the new intraoperative referencing system, so it was not used consistently. To arrive at a fair assessment, we opted to perform propensity matching based on age, gender, and AO fracture type. During the period in question, 36% (69 of 191) of patients with distal radius fractures who received a volar plate were treated using our novel intraoperative referencing system, and 64% (122 of 191) had surgery using conventional preoperative planning (control group). Of those, 91% (63 of 69) of patients who were treated with the intraoperative referencing system and 89% (108 of 122) of those in the control group were available for follow-up with all imaging and Mayo wrist scores at least 6 months after surgery. After propensity matching, that left us with two groups of 39 patients, who were well matched in terms of age and fracture type; these were the study groups. We also tried to match them according to gender, but there were fewer patients in the intraoperative referencing group, and the percentage of women for each group differed: 70% (44 of 63) in the intraoperative referencing group and 76% (82 of 108) in the control group. Also, there were fewer men with C3 fractures in the control group. Therefore, 64% (25 of 39) of patients in the intraoperative referencing group were women and 77% (30 of 39) of patients in the control group were women. In the intraoperative referencing group, our novel intraoperative referencing system was used in combination with the 3D digital preoperative planning system for preoperative planning. In the control group, preoperative planning was performed manually in a conventional manner using tracing paper and implant templates or using a digital template. We compared the groups in terms of operative duration, the radiation dose used in surgery, and Mayo wrist scores at 3 and 6 months after surgery. We also compared the groups in terms of loss of reduction on ulnar variance, palmar tilt, and radial inclination on plain radiographs taken 3 months and 6 months after surgery. We considered the plain radiograph taken 1 week after surgery as a baseline. Each item was compared between the image fusion and control groups using a Welch t - test. Results Mayo wrist scores were no different between the intraoperative referencing system and the control group at 3 months (71 ± 7 versus 72 ± 11, mean difference 1 [95% CI -3.7 to 5.7]; p = 0.07) or at 6 months after surgery (76 ± 6 versus 79 ± 11, mean difference 3 [95% CI -3.5 to 7.9]; p = 0.12). There were no differences in surgical duration or radiation doses between the intraoperative referencing and control groups. We found only a small advantage in favor of the intraoperative referencing system in terms of loss of reduction on ulnar variance (3 months after surgery: 0.2 ± 0.4 mm versus 0.6 ± 0.7 mm, mean difference 0.4 mm [95% CI 0.15 to 0.69]; p = 0.003, 6 months after surgery: 0.4 ± 0.6 mm versus 0.8 ± 0.8 mm, mean difference 0.4 mm [95% CI 0.05 to 0.73]; p = 0.02 for the intraoperative referencing system and the control group, respectively). This difference in radial shortening was so small that it was not likely to have been clinically important. Conclusion We found no clinically important advantages from the use of our novel intraoperative referencing system except a slight improvement in ulnar variance. Therefore, we recommend against its use in everyday practice at this time. However, future improvements may lead to better clinical outcomes, so we plan further investigations. Level of Evidence Level III, therapeutic study." @default.
• W4386483257 created "2023-09-07" @default.
• W4386483257 creator A5004737810 @default.
• W4386483257 creator A5009564545 @default.
• W4386483257 creator A5013654809 @default.
• W4386483257 creator A5056460873 @default.
• W4386483257 creator A5066237766 @default.
• W4386483257 date "2023-09-06" @default.
• W4386483257 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W4386483257 title "Is a Novel Fluoroscopic Intraoperative Reference System Superior to Conventional Management for Distal Radius Fracture Reduction? A Propensity-matched Comparative Study" @default.
• W4386483257 cites W1975191598 @default.
• W4386483257 cites W2018240443 @default.
• W4386483257 cites W2045839077 @default.
• W4386483257 cites W2092016061 @default.
• W4386483257 cites W2119442551 @default.
• W4386483257 cites W2136148671 @default.
• W4386483257 cites W2167037356 @default.
• W4386483257 cites W2301295469 @default.
• W4386483257 cites W2494604599 @default.
• W4386483257 cites W2606706509 @default.
• W4386483257 cites W2803413798 @default.
• W4386483257 cites W2919630409 @default.
• W4386483257 cites W2919685461 @default.
• W4386483257 cites W2983754088 @default.
• W4386483257 cites W3010774558 @default.
• W4386483257 cites W4293746128 @default.
• W4386483257 cites W4296253009 @default.
• W4386483257 cites W4316663163 @default.
• W4386483257 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/corr.0000000000002829" @default.
• W4386483257 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37678226" @default.
• W4386483257 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4386483257 type Work @default.
• W4386483257 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4386483257 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4386483257 hasAuthorship W4386483257A5004737810 @default.
• W4386483257 hasAuthorship W4386483257A5009564545 @default.
• W4386483257 hasAuthorship W4386483257A5013654809 @default.
• W4386483257 hasAuthorship W4386483257A5056460873 @default.
• W4386483257 hasAuthorship W4386483257A5066237766 @default.
• W4386483257 hasConcept C111335779 @default.
• W4386483257 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4386483257 hasConcept C146249460 @default.
• W4386483257 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W4386483257 hasConcept C2776805002 @default.
• W4386483257 hasConcept C2777304102 @default.
• W4386483257 hasConcept C2778216619 @default.
• W4386483257 hasConcept C2779370443 @default.
• W4386483257 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W4386483257 hasConcept C3020175042 @default.
• W4386483257 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4386483257 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W4386483257 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4386483257 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W4386483257 hasConceptScore W4386483257C111335779 @default.
• W4386483257 hasConceptScore W4386483257C141071460 @default.
• W4386483257 hasConceptScore W4386483257C146249460 @default.
• W4386483257 hasConceptScore W4386483257C2524010 @default.
• W4386483257 hasConceptScore W4386483257C2776805002 @default.
• W4386483257 hasConceptScore W4386483257C2777304102 @default.
• W4386483257 hasConceptScore W4386483257C2778216619 @default.
• W4386483257 hasConceptScore W4386483257C2779370443 @default.
• W4386483257 hasConceptScore W4386483257C2908647359 @default.
• W4386483257 hasConceptScore W4386483257C3020175042 @default.
• W4386483257 hasConceptScore W4386483257C33923547 @default.
• W4386483257 hasConceptScore W4386483257C36454342 @default.
• W4386483257 hasConceptScore W4386483257C71924100 @default.
• W4386483257 hasConceptScore W4386483257C99454951 @default.
• W4386483257 hasLocation W43864832571 @default.
• W4386483257 hasLocation W43864832572 @default.
• W4386483257 hasOpenAccess W4386483257 @default.
• W4386483257 hasPrimaryLocation W43864832571 @default.
• W4386483257 hasRelatedWork W1479871144 @default.
• W4386483257 hasRelatedWork W1985282869 @default.
• W4386483257 hasRelatedWork W2054987689 @default.
• W4386483257 hasRelatedWork W2093304956 @default.
• W4386483257 hasRelatedWork W2213765780 @default.
• W4386483257 hasRelatedWork W2398511541 @default.
• W4386483257 hasRelatedWork W2983754088 @default.
• W4386483257 hasRelatedWork W3049192081 @default.
• W4386483257 hasRelatedWork W3106628775 @default.
• W4386483257 hasRelatedWork W4321170170 @default.
• W4386483257 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4386483257 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4386483257 workType "article" @default.