FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4386519539> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4386519539 abstract "The relevance of the studied subject lies in the fact that freedom of speech is a fundamental human right that should be ensured at the legislative level. However, in the era of rapid development of information and communication technologies, it is necessary to find a balance between such provision and the protection of the rights of others. The purpose of the paper is to investigate the legal support of freedom of speech at the international level, and the experience of foreign countries in the legal regulation of this issue. The study utilises general theoretical methods of research, namely historical, abstract-logical, systemic-functional, analysis and synthesis, the method of theoretical generalisation to generalise the theoretical and legal foundations of ensuring freedom of speech existing in foreign countries and to systematise the components of the right to freedom of speech and criteria and conditions for restricting the right to freedom of speech and the right to express views and beliefs. Comparative legal method is used for the analysis and comparison of foreign legislation regulating freedom of speech and the right to express views and beliefs on the Internet. The paper substantiates that the problem of legal regulation of ensuring freedom of speech lies in the complexity of achieving an optimal balance between guaranteeing the right to freedom of speech and protecting others. It is revealed that the implementation of the right to freedom of speech on the Internet and in social networks in the United States, Japan, China, and Germany is regulated differently on the legislative level and various approaches are used. Special attention is paid to legislative provision of responsibility for spreading false information, protection of public safety, and protection of copyright on the Internet. The opinion is justified that the experience of Japan and Germany is the most acceptable for Ukraine. The practical importance of the study lies in the fact that the analysis of the legislation of foreign countries allowed identifying the features of legal regulation of the right to freedom of speech in individual states and establishing the advantages and disadvantages that may exist in this field." @default.
• W4386519539 created "2023-09-08" @default.
• W4386519539 creator A5036524616 @default.
• W4386519539 creator A5076450514 @default.
• W4386519539 creator A5081888057 @default.
• W4386519539 date "2023-03-24" @default.
• W4386519539 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W4386519539 title "International experience in legal support of freedom of speech on the Internet" @default.
• W4386519539 cites W2220075411 @default.
• W4386519539 cites W2235764471 @default.
• W4386519539 cites W2955731755 @default.
• W4386519539 cites W2987927104 @default.
• W4386519539 cites W3092743990 @default.
• W4386519539 cites W3125045716 @default.
• W4386519539 cites W3126625714 @default.
• W4386519539 cites W3154963527 @default.
• W4386519539 cites W3210297301 @default.
• W4386519539 cites W4247833083 @default.
• W4386519539 doi "https://doi.org/10.31548/law/2.2023.09" @default.
• W4386519539 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4386519539 type Work @default.
• W4386519539 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4386519539 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4386519539 hasAuthorship W4386519539A5036524616 @default.
• W4386519539 hasAuthorship W4386519539A5076450514 @default.
• W4386519539 hasAuthorship W4386519539A5081888057 @default.
• W4386519539 hasConcept C110875604 @default.
• W4386519539 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W4386519539 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4386519539 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4386519539 hasConcept C158154518 @default.
• W4386519539 hasConcept C168031717 @default.
• W4386519539 hasConcept C169437150 @default.
• W4386519539 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W4386519539 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4386519539 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W4386519539 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4386519539 hasConcept C2777351106 @default.
• W4386519539 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4386519539 hasConcept C83009810 @default.
• W4386519539 hasConceptScore W4386519539C110875604 @default.
• W4386519539 hasConceptScore W4386519539C136764020 @default.
• W4386519539 hasConceptScore W4386519539C144024400 @default.
• W4386519539 hasConceptScore W4386519539C15744967 @default.
• W4386519539 hasConceptScore W4386519539C158154518 @default.
• W4386519539 hasConceptScore W4386519539C168031717 @default.
• W4386519539 hasConceptScore W4386519539C169437150 @default.
• W4386519539 hasConceptScore W4386519539C169760540 @default.
• W4386519539 hasConceptScore W4386519539C17744445 @default.
• W4386519539 hasConceptScore W4386519539C190253527 @default.
• W4386519539 hasConceptScore W4386519539C199539241 @default.
• W4386519539 hasConceptScore W4386519539C2777351106 @default.
• W4386519539 hasConceptScore W4386519539C41008148 @default.
• W4386519539 hasConceptScore W4386519539C83009810 @default.
• W4386519539 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W4386519539 hasLocation W43865195391 @default.
• W4386519539 hasOpenAccess W4386519539 @default.
• W4386519539 hasPrimaryLocation W43865195391 @default.
• W4386519539 hasRelatedWork W1992051518 @default.
• W4386519539 hasRelatedWork W2020072885 @default.
• W4386519539 hasRelatedWork W2355159130 @default.
• W4386519539 hasRelatedWork W2369830313 @default.
• W4386519539 hasRelatedWork W2377538421 @default.
• W4386519539 hasRelatedWork W2379588904 @default.
• W4386519539 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W4386519539 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W4386519539 hasRelatedWork W3091174787 @default.
• W4386519539 hasRelatedWork W3170168195 @default.
• W4386519539 hasVolume "14" @default.
• W4386519539 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4386519539 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4386519539 workType "article" @default.