FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4386795928> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4386795928 endingPage "3225" @default.
• W4386795928 startingPage "3217" @default.
• W4386795928 abstract "Background: For severe anterior glenoid bone loss due to recurrent shoulder instability, the Latarjet procedure offers a dynamic sling effect in addition to bone augmentation. Yet, it heavily alters the surrounding anatomy, while fixation and graft union issues are also common. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare a novel printed 3-dimensional (3D) partial glenoid arthroplasty (PGA) implant with the classic Latarjet procedure. It was hypothesized that by replicating the original glenoid geometry and preserving soft tissue anatomy, PGA may better reproduce normal joint kinematics. In addition, the locking screw construct may offer stronger fixation. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 14 matched cadaveric shoulders were tested. The PGA implant was 3D printed in titanium based on preoperative computed tomography. The intact, 25% anterior glenoid bone loss, and postoperative states were tested in the scapular and coronal planes. The following parameters were measured: articular surface area and stepoff, rotational range of motion and the humeral head apex position during rotation, and load and linear stiffness at 25% anterior translation and at 2-mm construct displacement. Results: The baseline dimensions of the glenoid articular surface were comparable between the groups. The articular surface area after PGA was significantly larger ( P = .006) with less articular stepoff ( P = .030). PGA better approximated the intact state’s external ( P = .006) and total ( P = .019) rotational range of motion in the scapular plane. The course of the humeral head apex after PGA better followed that of the intact state ( P < .001). Resistance against anterior translation after PGA was not significantly different compared with after the Latarjet procedure. Greater linear stiffness ( P = .031) and loading ( P = .002) at 2-mm construct displacement were demonstrated in the PGA group. Conclusion: In addressing anterior glenoid bone loss, PGA better approximated intact glenohumeral joint kinematics compared with the Latarjet procedure with less articular stepoff in a cadaveric model. PGA was comparable in resisting anterior translation while being significantly stronger against loading at 2-mm construct displacement. Further clinical studies are warranted to validate this novel procedure. Clinical Relevance: A 3D-printed PGA implant may offer an alternative treatment option for severe glenoid bone loss due to shoulder instability, overcoming the previous drawbacks of the Latarjet procedure, including altered kinematics, fixation failure, and hardware issues." @default.
• W4386795928 created "2023-09-17" @default.
• W4386795928 creator A5003645258 @default.
• W4386795928 creator A5008089671 @default.
• W4386795928 creator A5012179692 @default.
• W4386795928 creator A5018049768 @default.
• W4386795928 creator A5044548418 @default.
• W4386795928 creator A5053080982 @default.
• W4386795928 creator A5058680644 @default.
• W4386795928 date "2023-09-16" @default.
• W4386795928 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4386795928 title "Cadaveric Biomechanical Study of Partial Glenoid Arthroplasty Versus the Latarjet Procedure for Anterior Glenoid Bone Loss" @default.
• W4386795928 cites W1968120007 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W2013090529 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W2023805239 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W2032151333 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W2048788061 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W2052848285 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W2055828530 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W2093378114 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W2096885057 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W2098614944 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W2105729371 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W2110517665 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W2115988797 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W2117184169 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W2120081851 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W2122831384 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W2140686011 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W2140876930 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W2167621200 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W2169888766 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W2193058525 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W2274993681 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W2283547896 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W2418460895 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W2498431159 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W2515020170 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W2566323845 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W2588528976 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W2621152322 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W2624872199 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W2792113610 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W2793091701 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W2867775691 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W2906089119 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W3027254748 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W3049760116 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W3154850213 @default.
• W4386795928 cites W4252235969 @default.
• W4386795928 doi "https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465231192086" @default.
• W4386795928 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37715516" @default.
• W4386795928 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4386795928 type Work @default.
• W4386795928 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4386795928 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4386795928 hasAuthorship W4386795928A5003645258 @default.
• W4386795928 hasAuthorship W4386795928A5008089671 @default.
• W4386795928 hasAuthorship W4386795928A5012179692 @default.
• W4386795928 hasAuthorship W4386795928A5018049768 @default.
• W4386795928 hasAuthorship W4386795928A5044548418 @default.
• W4386795928 hasAuthorship W4386795928A5053080982 @default.
• W4386795928 hasAuthorship W4386795928A5058680644 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConcept C126249036 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConcept C13483470 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConcept C146249460 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConcept C170700871 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConcept C175696284 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConcept C2777307732 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConcept C2777325788 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConcept C2778336525 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConcept C2779777117 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConcept C2780677649 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConcept C2781411149 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConcept C60465272 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConceptScore W4386795928C105702510 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConceptScore W4386795928C126249036 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConceptScore W4386795928C13483470 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConceptScore W4386795928C141071460 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConceptScore W4386795928C146249460 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConceptScore W4386795928C170700871 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConceptScore W4386795928C175696284 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConceptScore W4386795928C2777307732 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConceptScore W4386795928C2777325788 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConceptScore W4386795928C2778336525 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConceptScore W4386795928C2779777117 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConceptScore W4386795928C2780677649 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConceptScore W4386795928C2781411149 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConceptScore W4386795928C2908647359 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConceptScore W4386795928C29694066 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConceptScore W4386795928C60465272 @default.
• W4386795928 hasConceptScore W4386795928C71924100 @default.

• next