FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4387014927> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4387014927 abstract "<p><strong>Background:</strong> Comprehensive multi-institutional patient portals that provide patients with web-based access to their data from across the health system have been shown to improve the provision of patient-centered and integrated care. However, several factors hinder the implementation of these portals. Although barriers and facilitators to patient portal adoption are well documented, there is a dearth of evidence examining how to effectively implement multi-institutional patient portals that transcend traditional boundaries and disparate systems.</p> <p><strong>Objective:</strong> This study aims to explore how the implementation approach of a multi-institutional patient portal impacted the adoption and use of the technology and to identify the lessons learned to guide the implementation of similar patient portal models.</p> <p><strong>Methods:</strong> This multimethod study included an analysis of quantitative and qualitative data collected during an evaluation of the multi-institutional MyChart patient portal that was deployed in Southwestern Ontario, Canada. Descriptive statistics were performed to understand the use patterns during the first 15 months of implementation (between August 2018 and October 2019). In addition, 42 qualitative semistructured interviews were conducted with 18 administrative stakeholders, 16 patients, 7 health care providers, and 1 informal caregiver to understand how the implementation approach influenced user experiences and to identify strategies for improvement. Qualitative data were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis approach.</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong> Between August 2018 and October 2019, 15,271 registration emails were sent, with 67.01% (10,233/15,271) registered for an account across 38 health care sites. The median number of patients registered per site was 19, with considerable variation (range 1-2114). Of the total number of sites, 55% (21/38) had ≤30 registered patients, whereas only 2 sites had over 1000 registered patients. Interview participants perceived that the patient experience of the portal would have been improved by enhancing the data comprehensiveness of the technology. They also attributed the lack of enrollment to the absence of a broad rollout and marketing strategy across sites. Participants emphasized that provider engagement, change management support, and senior leadership endorsement were central to fostering uptake. Finally, many stated that regional alignment and policy support should have been sought to streamline implementation efforts across participating sites.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Without proper management and planning, multi-institutional portals can suffer from minimal adoption. Data comprehensiveness is the foundational component of these portals and requires aligned policies and a key base of technology infrastructure across all participating sites. It is important to look beyond the category of the technology (ie, patient portal) and consider its functionality (eg, data aggregation, appointment scheduling, messaging) to ensure that it aligns with the underlying strategic priorities of the deployment. It is also critical to establish a clear vision and ensure buy-ins from organizational leadership and health care providers to support a cultural shift that will enable a meaningful and widespread engagement.</p>" @default.
• W4387014927 created "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4387014927 creator A5019780979 @default.
• W4387014927 creator A5021768435 @default.
• W4387014927 creator A5027426212 @default.
• W4387014927 creator A5030899830 @default.
• W4387014927 creator A5036542248 @default.
• W4387014927 creator A5056882175 @default.
• W4387014927 creator A5082009546 @default.
• W4387014927 date "2023-09-25" @default.
• W4387014927 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W4387014927 title "Implementation Strategies to Improve Engagement With a Multi-Institutional Patient Portal: Multimethod Study" @default.
• W4387014927 doi "https://doi.org/10.32920/24191457" @default.
• W4387014927 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4387014927 type Work @default.
• W4387014927 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4387014927 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W4387014927 hasAuthorship W4387014927A5019780979 @default.
• W4387014927 hasAuthorship W4387014927A5021768435 @default.
• W4387014927 hasAuthorship W4387014927A5027426212 @default.
• W4387014927 hasAuthorship W4387014927A5030899830 @default.
• W4387014927 hasAuthorship W4387014927A5036542248 @default.
• W4387014927 hasAuthorship W4387014927A5056882175 @default.
• W4387014927 hasAuthorship W4387014927A5082009546 @default.
• W4387014927 hasBestOaLocation W43870149271 @default.
• W4387014927 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W4387014927 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W4387014927 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4387014927 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4387014927 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W4387014927 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4387014927 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W4387014927 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4387014927 hasConcept C2776153502 @default.
• W4387014927 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W4387014927 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W4387014927 hasConcept C39896193 @default.
• W4387014927 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4387014927 hasConcept C56739046 @default.
• W4387014927 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4387014927 hasConcept C74196892 @default.
• W4387014927 hasConcept C87156501 @default.
• W4387014927 hasConceptScore W4387014927C105795698 @default.
• W4387014927 hasConceptScore W4387014927C119857082 @default.
• W4387014927 hasConceptScore W4387014927C144024400 @default.
• W4387014927 hasConceptScore W4387014927C15744967 @default.
• W4387014927 hasConceptScore W4387014927C160735492 @default.
• W4387014927 hasConceptScore W4387014927C17744445 @default.
• W4387014927 hasConceptScore W4387014927C190248442 @default.
• W4387014927 hasConceptScore W4387014927C199539241 @default.
• W4387014927 hasConceptScore W4387014927C2776153502 @default.
• W4387014927 hasConceptScore W4387014927C33923547 @default.
• W4387014927 hasConceptScore W4387014927C36289849 @default.
• W4387014927 hasConceptScore W4387014927C39896193 @default.
• W4387014927 hasConceptScore W4387014927C41008148 @default.
• W4387014927 hasConceptScore W4387014927C56739046 @default.
• W4387014927 hasConceptScore W4387014927C71924100 @default.
• W4387014927 hasConceptScore W4387014927C74196892 @default.
• W4387014927 hasConceptScore W4387014927C87156501 @default.
• W4387014927 hasLocation W43870149271 @default.
• W4387014927 hasOpenAccess W4387014927 @default.
• W4387014927 hasPrimaryLocation W43870149271 @default.
• W4387014927 hasRelatedWork W2122515533 @default.
• W4387014927 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W4387014927 hasRelatedWork W2796180820 @default.
• W4387014927 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W4387014927 hasRelatedWork W2969233659 @default.
• W4387014927 hasRelatedWork W3029476422 @default.
• W4387014927 hasRelatedWork W3135433936 @default.
• W4387014927 hasRelatedWork W3184992248 @default.
• W4387014927 hasRelatedWork W4224056296 @default.
• W4387014927 hasRelatedWork W4285585579 @default.
• W4387014927 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4387014927 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4387014927 workType "article" @default.