FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4387053145> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4387053145 endingPage "205" @default.
• W4387053145 startingPage "191" @default.
• W4387053145 abstract "The assessment of geoheritage and geodiversity is a necessary prerequisite for the development of measures to preserve unique geological and geomorphological objects. Various foreign and domestic researchers have developed a low-level methodology for evaluating and determining the recreational value of geological and geomorphological objects. Leading developers of methodological approaches in the field of geoheritage assessment are foreign scientists Reynard (Reynard, 2012), Brilha (2016), Rocha (2014), Pereira (2013), Ferrero (Ferrero, 2012), Gray (2013 ), Fassoulas (Fassoulas, 2012), Zouros (Zouros, 2007), Asrat (Asrat et al., 2012) and others. In Ukraine, V. Hrytsenko (2006), Yu. Zinko (2003, 2009, 2019), V. Brusak (2011, 2013, 2014, 2019), S. Bortnyk, V. Stetsyuk, etc. (2020), V. Stetsyuk, (2021), G. Bayrak, L. Teodorovych (2020), G. Bayrak, A. Manko (2021) and others are engaged in the study of geological and geomorphological objects promising for geoconservation. The meaning of the concepts geoheritage, geodiversity and geoconservation and their relationship should be distinguished. Geoheritage is geological and geomorphological objects that have special value in scientific, educational, aesthetic, recreational and other aspects, and geoconservation is the process of protecting and preserving these objects. Geoheritage is a part of geodiversity, which, in addition to geological and geomorphological properties, includes pedological, hydrological and other elements of inanimate nature in certain territories. Geodiversity, along with biodiversity, is a component of the World Natural Heritage. Geoheritage is studied at five levels – global (world), continental, national, regional and local. Two types of geoheritage assessment methods have been developed – direct and indirect. According to the evaluation procedure, the methods are divided into qualitative, quantitative, and qualitative-quantitative. Qualitative assessment consists in determining the total value of objects based on the results of descriptive studies and without any quantitative expression. Quantitative evaluation consists in defining clear evaluation criteria, their gradation and assigning certain points for each degree of evaluation gradation. Each of the criteria is divided into sub-indices that allow covering the entire spectrum of qualitative assessment of geoheritage objects. Scientific, educational, recreational, economic, prospective and other values are distinguished as evaluation criteria. The total final value of the geoheritage site is determined by the sum of points. The choice of methods for evaluating geoheritage objects was chosen depending on the characteristics of the object of study and the natural features of the studied territory. Key words: geoheritage; geoconservation; geodiversity; geoheritage assessment methods." @default.
• W4387053145 created "2023-09-27" @default.
• W4387053145 creator A5042458275 @default.
• W4387053145 date "2023-09-25" @default.
• W4387053145 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W4387053145 title "OWERVIEW OF GEOHERITAGE ASSESSMENT METHODS" @default.
• W4387053145 doi "https://doi.org/10.30970/gpc.2023.1.3955" @default.
• W4387053145 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4387053145 type Work @default.
• W4387053145 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4387053145 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4387053145 hasAuthorship W4387053145A5042458275 @default.
• W4387053145 hasBestOaLocation W43870531451 @default.
• W4387053145 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W4387053145 hasConcept C130217890 @default.
• W4387053145 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W4387053145 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W4387053145 hasConcept C18918823 @default.
• W4387053145 hasConcept C194962172 @default.
• W4387053145 hasConcept C1965285 @default.
• W4387053145 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W4387053145 hasConcept C2776797426 @default.
• W4387053145 hasConcept C2777060688 @default.
• W4387053145 hasConcept C2777326885 @default.
• W4387053145 hasConcept C2778045388 @default.
• W4387053145 hasConcept C2781038237 @default.
• W4387053145 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4387053145 hasConceptScore W4387053145C127313418 @default.
• W4387053145 hasConceptScore W4387053145C130217890 @default.
• W4387053145 hasConceptScore W4387053145C166957645 @default.
• W4387053145 hasConceptScore W4387053145C18903297 @default.
• W4387053145 hasConceptScore W4387053145C18918823 @default.
• W4387053145 hasConceptScore W4387053145C194962172 @default.
• W4387053145 hasConceptScore W4387053145C1965285 @default.
• W4387053145 hasConceptScore W4387053145C205649164 @default.
• W4387053145 hasConceptScore W4387053145C2776797426 @default.
• W4387053145 hasConceptScore W4387053145C2777060688 @default.
• W4387053145 hasConceptScore W4387053145C2777326885 @default.
• W4387053145 hasConceptScore W4387053145C2778045388 @default.
• W4387053145 hasConceptScore W4387053145C2781038237 @default.
• W4387053145 hasConceptScore W4387053145C86803240 @default.
• W4387053145 hasIssue "15" @default.
• W4387053145 hasLocation W43870531451 @default.
• W4387053145 hasOpenAccess W4387053145 @default.
• W4387053145 hasPrimaryLocation W43870531451 @default.
• W4387053145 hasRelatedWork W2315186291 @default.
• W4387053145 hasRelatedWork W2540319985 @default.
• W4387053145 hasRelatedWork W2580087076 @default.
• W4387053145 hasRelatedWork W3195227471 @default.
• W4387053145 hasRelatedWork W4221026114 @default.
• W4387053145 hasRelatedWork W4283364766 @default.
• W4387053145 hasRelatedWork W4311524999 @default.
• W4387053145 hasRelatedWork W4367317644 @default.
• W4387053145 hasRelatedWork W4385455383 @default.
• W4387053145 hasRelatedWork W2983342590 @default.
• W4387053145 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4387053145 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4387053145 workType "article" @default.