FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4387077993> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4387077993 abstract "This LTE explains the scientific basis for the retraction (red of retraction) of our publication “Microvascular resistance reserve in the presence of functionally significant epicardial stenosis and changes after revascularization”. Clinical significance of microvascular dysfunction has been increasingly recognized as a relevant cause of myocardial ischemia and worse outcomes (Taqueti & Di Carli, 2018). However, there are limited tools available to quantify or estimate coronary microvascular function, particularly in the presence of significant epicardial coronary artery stenosis (Fearon et al., 2003; Kelshiker et al., 2022). In 2021, De Bruyne, Pijls, and Fearon, et al. introduced Microvascular Resistance Reserve (MRR) as a novel index for the assessment of the coronary microcirculation (De Bruyne et al., 2021). MRR has been shown to be accurate and reproducible, can be easily measured, is independent of autoregulation and myocardial mass, and is—in contrast to existing indices—an operator-independent measure of coronary microvascular dysfunction. The authors have presented the theoretical framework of MRR and its derivation by physiological measures in a seminal paper in JACC in 2021 (De Bruyne et al., 2021). In that paper, they also suggested in the supplementary material that MRR might require correction in cases of severe epicardial stenosis with abundant collaterals, in analogy to the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) which needs correction as proposed by Aarnoudse et al. and Yong et al (Aarnoudse et al., 2004; Fearon et al., 2013; Yong et al., 2013). Thus, we sought to investigate such possible correction factor based upon the empirical relation FFRcor = (1.36 × FFRmyo − 0.34) and believed that MRR should be corrected by such factor. Yet, our hypothesis was not correct and after extensive discussion with the senior authors of the conceptual paper we have to conclude that MRR is indeed completely independent of epicardial stenosis severity and does not need any correction factor. First, in the mathematical derivation of MRR in the conceptual paper (page 1–6 of its supplementary appendix), it is evident that epicardial stenosis does not affect MRR. Second, any conceptually correct index in coronary physiology should have a meaning and remain valid across the complete range of coronary stenosis, from 0% (“normal”) to 100% (“total occlusion”, when coronary flow equals zero but myocardial flow is still a finite number). In the way we thought MRR had to be defined (Hanyu et al., 2023), in case of an increasingly severe stenosis approaching total occlusion, its value would go to infinity because FFRcor approaches zero. That limitation is similar to IMR (= Pd,hyper. Tmn,hyper) with Tmn approaching infinity and hyperemic microvascular reserve (hMRv) (= Pd,hyper/flow velocity) with flow velocity approaching zero and hMRv approaching infinity therefore, IMR and hMRv cannot be universally used and need to be corrected (Aarnoudse et al., 2004; Yong et al., 2013). In contrast, MRR remains a constant and finite number and still represents true resting microvascular resistance (true Rμ,rest) divided by hyperemic microvascular resistance (Rμ,hyper). We have added a representative case where all relevant physiologic parameters were measured before PCI of a very severe LAD stenosis (FFR = 0.24) and after a moderate result of that PCI (FFR = 0.63). MRR remains completely unaffected at a normal value of 4.7. With the correction as proposed in our previous paper (Hanyu et al., 2023), it is not possible to accurately represent the values of MRR and IMR because the value of FFRcor takes a negative value (FFRcor = −0.014). In conclusion, our previous paper in this Journal (Hanyu et al., 2023) correctly derived the empirical relation between FFRcor and FFRmyo in the study population, but erroneously suggested that such correction is necessary for calculation of MRR. In contrast, Microvascular Resistance Reserve as initially described (De Bruyne et al., 2021) is indeed completely independent of epicardial stenosis severity and does not need any correction. In our previous paper (Hanyu et al., 2023), paragraphs 2.1, 2.2, 3.1, 3.2, table 1, figures 1, 3, and 4 correctly present the empirical relation between FFRcor and FFRmyo. However, Abstract, Introduction, paragraphs 2.3, 2.4, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6, figures 2, 5, 6, and part of the Results and Discussion paragraphs are considered invalid. We acknowledge extensive and clarifying comments by Nico Pijls, MD, PhD, professor of cardiology Catharina Hospital Eindhoven (NL), in preparing this Letter to the Editor. None. The authors have no conflict of interest to declare. Ethical approval was granted by the Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital institutional ethics committee (2023FY2) on April 3/2023." @default.
• W4387077993 created "2023-09-28" @default.
• W4387077993 creator A5000353692 @default.
• W4387077993 creator A5002921780 @default.
• W4387077993 creator A5017917675 @default.
• W4387077993 creator A5021961795 @default.
• W4387077993 creator A5024335874 @default.
• W4387077993 creator A5025969599 @default.
• W4387077993 creator A5035611671 @default.
• W4387077993 creator A5042802938 @default.
• W4387077993 creator A5044158910 @default.
• W4387077993 creator A5046500459 @default.
• W4387077993 creator A5060624755 @default.
• W4387077993 creator A5064015226 @default.
• W4387077993 creator A5066264242 @default.
• W4387077993 creator A5069223437 @default.
• W4387077993 creator A5073277197 @default.
• W4387077993 date "2023-09-01" @default.
• W4387077993 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4387077993 title "<scp>LTE</scp>: Scientific basis for retraction of article “microvascular resistance reserve in the presence of functionally significant epicardial stenosis and changes after revascularization”" @default.
• W4387077993 cites W2000721468 @default.
• W4387077993 cites W2004389112 @default.
• W4387077993 cites W2021254443 @default.
• W4387077993 cites W2078833361 @default.
• W4387077993 cites W2900705378 @default.
• W4387077993 cites W3204698412 @default.
• W4387077993 cites W3215657276 @default.
• W4387077993 cites W4323920659 @default.
• W4387077993 doi "https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.15807" @default.
• W4387077993 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37753670" @default.
• W4387077993 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4387077993 type Work @default.
• W4387077993 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4387077993 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4387077993 hasAuthorship W4387077993A5000353692 @default.
• W4387077993 hasAuthorship W4387077993A5002921780 @default.
• W4387077993 hasAuthorship W4387077993A5017917675 @default.
• W4387077993 hasAuthorship W4387077993A5021961795 @default.
• W4387077993 hasAuthorship W4387077993A5024335874 @default.
• W4387077993 hasAuthorship W4387077993A5025969599 @default.
• W4387077993 hasAuthorship W4387077993A5035611671 @default.
• W4387077993 hasAuthorship W4387077993A5042802938 @default.
• W4387077993 hasAuthorship W4387077993A5044158910 @default.
• W4387077993 hasAuthorship W4387077993A5046500459 @default.
• W4387077993 hasAuthorship W4387077993A5060624755 @default.
• W4387077993 hasAuthorship W4387077993A5064015226 @default.
• W4387077993 hasAuthorship W4387077993A5066264242 @default.
• W4387077993 hasAuthorship W4387077993A5069223437 @default.
• W4387077993 hasAuthorship W4387077993A5073277197 @default.
• W4387077993 hasBestOaLocation W43870779931 @default.
• W4387077993 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4387077993 hasConcept C12722491 @default.
• W4387077993 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
• W4387077993 hasConcept C2776820930 @default.
• W4387077993 hasConcept C2777987666 @default.
• W4387077993 hasConcept C2778213512 @default.
• W4387077993 hasConcept C2778707443 @default.
• W4387077993 hasConcept C2779464278 @default.
• W4387077993 hasConcept C2780007028 @default.
• W4387077993 hasConcept C3018917099 @default.
• W4387077993 hasConcept C3019004856 @default.
• W4387077993 hasConcept C500558357 @default.
• W4387077993 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4387077993 hasConceptScore W4387077993C126322002 @default.
• W4387077993 hasConceptScore W4387077993C12722491 @default.
• W4387077993 hasConceptScore W4387077993C164705383 @default.
• W4387077993 hasConceptScore W4387077993C2776820930 @default.
• W4387077993 hasConceptScore W4387077993C2777987666 @default.
• W4387077993 hasConceptScore W4387077993C2778213512 @default.
• W4387077993 hasConceptScore W4387077993C2778707443 @default.
• W4387077993 hasConceptScore W4387077993C2779464278 @default.
• W4387077993 hasConceptScore W4387077993C2780007028 @default.
• W4387077993 hasConceptScore W4387077993C3018917099 @default.
• W4387077993 hasConceptScore W4387077993C3019004856 @default.
• W4387077993 hasConceptScore W4387077993C500558357 @default.
• W4387077993 hasConceptScore W4387077993C71924100 @default.
• W4387077993 hasIssue "18" @default.
• W4387077993 hasLocation W43870779931 @default.
• W4387077993 hasLocation W43870779932 @default.
• W4387077993 hasOpenAccess W4387077993 @default.
• W4387077993 hasPrimaryLocation W43870779931 @default.
• W4387077993 hasRelatedWork W1951418711 @default.
• W4387077993 hasRelatedWork W1996841774 @default.
• W4387077993 hasRelatedWork W2126374016 @default.
• W4387077993 hasRelatedWork W2155099369 @default.
• W4387077993 hasRelatedWork W2595671560 @default.
• W4387077993 hasRelatedWork W2615551301 @default.
• W4387077993 hasRelatedWork W2790962264 @default.
• W4387077993 hasRelatedWork W2887442164 @default.
• W4387077993 hasRelatedWork W2982256033 @default.
• W4387077993 hasRelatedWork W3030054104 @default.
• W4387077993 hasVolume "11" @default.
• W4387077993 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4387077993 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4387077993 workType "article" @default.