Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4387156910> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 81 of
81
with 100 items per page.
- W4387156910 endingPage "286" @default.
- W4387156910 startingPage "281" @default.
- W4387156910 abstract "Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of both the same polishing method and those with and without thermal aging on the surface roughness of conventional, CAD/CAM milling and 3D printing denture base materials.
 Materials and Methods: A total of 30 round shaped specimens were obtained by 3 different methods (n=10): Conventional, CAD/CAM milling and 3D-Printing. After applying the same polishing technique to all groups, surface roughness values were measured. Profilometer device was used for surface roughness measurement. Then, after the thermal aging of all samples, surface roughness values were measured and the roughness values between no-thermocycling and thermocycling were compared. Tukey, Mann Whitney U and Kruskal Wallis tests were used statistically. P values of ≤ 0.05 were considered significant. 
 Results: As a result of the same polishing process, there was a difference in surface roughness in all groups. While the highest surface roughness values were seen in 3D-printing, the lowest roughness value was seen in the CAD/CAM milling and was statistically significant (p<0.05). Thermocycling did not show a statistically significant difference in surface roughness (p>0.05).
 Conclusions: The same polishing process caused different surface roughness values in the denture base materials obtained with different methods, and the lowest surface roughness value was seen in the CAD/CAM milling." @default.
- W4387156910 created "2023-09-30" @default.
- W4387156910 creator A5071883400 @default.
- W4387156910 creator A5092964243 @default.
- W4387156910 date "2023-09-29" @default.
- W4387156910 modified "2023-10-06" @default.
- W4387156910 title "Comparison of the Effect of the Same Polishing Method on the Surface Roughness of Conventional, CAD/CAM Milling and 3D Printing Denture Base Materials" @default.
- W4387156910 cites W1989694736 @default.
- W4387156910 cites W2079273583 @default.
- W4387156910 cites W2082685230 @default.
- W4387156910 cites W2113051910 @default.
- W4387156910 cites W2124132053 @default.
- W4387156910 cites W2145797927 @default.
- W4387156910 cites W2421677712 @default.
- W4387156910 cites W2765297434 @default.
- W4387156910 cites W2808238056 @default.
- W4387156910 cites W2810343572 @default.
- W4387156910 cites W2883484280 @default.
- W4387156910 cites W2889744599 @default.
- W4387156910 cites W2890860779 @default.
- W4387156910 cites W2912328574 @default.
- W4387156910 cites W2918476203 @default.
- W4387156910 cites W2991866212 @default.
- W4387156910 cites W3020947798 @default.
- W4387156910 cites W3092339810 @default.
- W4387156910 cites W3120956874 @default.
- W4387156910 cites W3191567004 @default.
- W4387156910 cites W4225939142 @default.
- W4387156910 cites W4281762918 @default.
- W4387156910 cites W4288049255 @default.
- W4387156910 doi "https://doi.org/10.7126/cumudj.1317851" @default.
- W4387156910 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
- W4387156910 type Work @default.
- W4387156910 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4387156910 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4387156910 hasAuthorship W4387156910A5071883400 @default.
- W4387156910 hasAuthorship W4387156910A5092964243 @default.
- W4387156910 hasBestOaLocation W43871569101 @default.
- W4387156910 hasConcept C107365816 @default.
- W4387156910 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W4387156910 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W4387156910 hasConcept C138113353 @default.
- W4387156910 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
- W4387156910 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
- W4387156910 hasConcept C199639397 @default.
- W4387156910 hasConcept C3018023364 @default.
- W4387156910 hasConcept C71039073 @default.
- W4387156910 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W4387156910 hasConcept C79261456 @default.
- W4387156910 hasConceptScore W4387156910C107365816 @default.
- W4387156910 hasConceptScore W4387156910C126322002 @default.
- W4387156910 hasConceptScore W4387156910C127413603 @default.
- W4387156910 hasConceptScore W4387156910C138113353 @default.
- W4387156910 hasConceptScore W4387156910C159985019 @default.
- W4387156910 hasConceptScore W4387156910C192562407 @default.
- W4387156910 hasConceptScore W4387156910C199639397 @default.
- W4387156910 hasConceptScore W4387156910C3018023364 @default.
- W4387156910 hasConceptScore W4387156910C71039073 @default.
- W4387156910 hasConceptScore W4387156910C71924100 @default.
- W4387156910 hasConceptScore W4387156910C79261456 @default.
- W4387156910 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W4387156910 hasLocation W43871569101 @default.
- W4387156910 hasLocation W43871569102 @default.
- W4387156910 hasOpenAccess W4387156910 @default.
- W4387156910 hasPrimaryLocation W43871569101 @default.
- W4387156910 hasRelatedWork W2006065686 @default.
- W4387156910 hasRelatedWork W2040780104 @default.
- W4387156910 hasRelatedWork W2237675683 @default.
- W4387156910 hasRelatedWork W2349732462 @default.
- W4387156910 hasRelatedWork W2383005713 @default.
- W4387156910 hasRelatedWork W2782769319 @default.
- W4387156910 hasRelatedWork W4312578898 @default.
- W4387156910 hasRelatedWork W4321262012 @default.
- W4387156910 hasRelatedWork W4361004102 @default.
- W4387156910 hasRelatedWork W621187962 @default.
- W4387156910 hasVolume "26" @default.
- W4387156910 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4387156910 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4387156910 workType "article" @default.