FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4387247452> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4387247452 endingPage "169" @default.
• W4387247452 startingPage "155" @default.
• W4387247452 abstract "The issue of printing and craft is one of the ancient critical and rhetorical concepts, which accompanied the process of poetic creativity and tried to define its features and control its foundations, besides, it became the means and purpose of criticism in judging poetry in terms of quality and mediocrity in distinguishing the good poet from the other. This issue had a special place among ancient critics and modernists. Each of these critics had a special point of view on the issue. These critics tried to find criteria for criticism of poetry, so they called the printed one who came with easy poetry free from education and workmanship, that is, the one who comes free from the mind without trouble and fatigue in poetic language. There were many studies that referred to that issue, but it remained dissonant and brief, and did not reach the desired goal. While looking at the ancient and modern critical books, we note that they dealt with this issue in all brevity, and among these books, Al-Omda by Ibn Rashiq, Al-Bayan and Al-Tibween by Al-Jahiz, and the characteristics by Ibn Jinni. , and given the importance of this topic in ancient and modern Arabic criticism, knowing good poetry from other, and distinguishing poets among them, my choice fell on this topic, i.e. printing and workmanship from the perspective of ancient and modern criticism, and I relied on the historical method in writing the research. The research is divided into an introduction, and two other sections, and in each topic, the preface talked about the concept of the issue and the definition of printing and craft, linguistically and idiomatically. In the first section, I dealt with the most important opinions of the old critics in printing and craftsmanship, namely Al-Asma'i, Al-Jahiz, Ibn Qutaiba, Al-Amdi, Abu Hilal, and Ibn Rashiq, and how the opinions differed among some and were similar to others. As for the second section: I tried to list some of the opinions of the modernists and their objections to the issue, among them Shawqi Dhaif, who believes that the doctrine of craftsmanship depends on elegance in artistic expression and tendency to decoration, and Mustafa Sadiq al-Rafi’i and how he tries to differentiate between two types of craftsmanship, that is, poetic craft among the pre-Islamic and craftsmanship at both births, and the opinion of Muhammad Mustafa, and Ahmad Badawi, as well as concluded the research with a number of results." @default.
• W4387247452 created "2023-10-03" @default.
• W4387247452 creator A5015147289 @default.
• W4387247452 date "2023-06-13" @default.
• W4387247452 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W4387247452 title "Nature and Craftsmanship in Our Ancient Poetry from Criticism Perspective, in the Past and Present" @default.
• W4387247452 doi "https://doi.org/10.51345/.v34i2.717.g359" @default.
• W4387247452 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4387247452 type Work @default.
• W4387247452 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4387247452 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4387247452 hasAuthorship W4387247452A5015147289 @default.
• W4387247452 hasBestOaLocation W43872474521 @default.
• W4387247452 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W4387247452 hasConcept C117309347 @default.
• W4387247452 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W4387247452 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W4387247452 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W4387247452 hasConcept C142932270 @default.
• W4387247452 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
• W4387247452 hasConcept C164913051 @default.
• W4387247452 hasConcept C192562157 @default.
• W4387247452 hasConcept C2779732396 @default.
• W4387247452 hasConcept C7991579 @default.
• W4387247452 hasConcept C87355193 @default.
• W4387247452 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W4387247452 hasConceptScore W4387247452C107038049 @default.
• W4387247452 hasConceptScore W4387247452C117309347 @default.
• W4387247452 hasConceptScore W4387247452C121332964 @default.
• W4387247452 hasConceptScore W4387247452C124952713 @default.
• W4387247452 hasConceptScore W4387247452C142362112 @default.
• W4387247452 hasConceptScore W4387247452C142932270 @default.
• W4387247452 hasConceptScore W4387247452C153349607 @default.
• W4387247452 hasConceptScore W4387247452C164913051 @default.
• W4387247452 hasConceptScore W4387247452C192562157 @default.
• W4387247452 hasConceptScore W4387247452C2779732396 @default.
• W4387247452 hasConceptScore W4387247452C7991579 @default.
• W4387247452 hasConceptScore W4387247452C87355193 @default.
• W4387247452 hasConceptScore W4387247452C95457728 @default.
• W4387247452 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W4387247452 hasLocation W43872474521 @default.
• W4387247452 hasOpenAccess W4387247452 @default.
• W4387247452 hasPrimaryLocation W43872474521 @default.
• W4387247452 hasRelatedWork W170072754 @default.
• W4387247452 hasRelatedWork W2354722052 @default.
• W4387247452 hasRelatedWork W2364055278 @default.
• W4387247452 hasRelatedWork W2366776946 @default.
• W4387247452 hasRelatedWork W2368072152 @default.
• W4387247452 hasRelatedWork W2374219176 @default.
• W4387247452 hasRelatedWork W2378031199 @default.
• W4387247452 hasRelatedWork W2390121952 @default.
• W4387247452 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W4387247452 hasRelatedWork W4321463838 @default.
• W4387247452 hasVolume "34" @default.
• W4387247452 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4387247452 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4387247452 workType "article" @default.