FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4387265280> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4387265280 endingPage "121" @default.
• W4387265280 startingPage "116" @default.
• W4387265280 abstract "Aims: Technological advancements have played a crucial role in the advanced development of organ support systems in intensive care units (ICUs). While the utilization of support systems enhances patient discharge rates, it also extends the ICU stay of patients with terminal comorbidities who have no chance of survival. This elongation of the dying process, which is the inevitable outcome, results in a suspension of life in a sense. Hence, the effective implementation of end-of-life decisions and care stands as one of the crucial steps in the intensive care process. The objective of this study is to identify barriers to end-of-life decision-making and care in intensive care settings. Its aim is to facilitate a comprehensive, suitable, and peaceful experience for patients at the end of life and their families by making the necessary arrangements. Methods: This survey study involved physicians and nurses evaluating the prepared questionnaire questions concerning the challenges encountered in intensive care settings. Results: The most important barriers to making end-of-life decisions in intensive care were; among clinician-related factors, concern about legal liability for withholding life-sustaining treatments was 98 (79.7%), among institutional and ICU-related factors, the lack of regulated protocols and standards for end-of-life decisions and care was 96 (78%), among family-related factors, unrealistic expectations of patients and/or families about the prognosis or effectiveness of ICU treatment was 83 (67.5%), and disagreements among family members about end-of-life decisions was 80 (65%).Regarding end-of-life care, the admission of patients to the intensive care unit who would not benefit from treatments in the intensive care unit was rated as 110 (89.4%) and the absence of palliative care services to which a dying patient could be transferred was rated as 108 (87.8%). Conclusion: Providing unavailing treatments to patients who will not benefit from intensive care interventions results in a decline in quality of life, increased distress among family members, and burnout among intensive care staff. Therefore, end-of-life decisions and care should be effectively implemented in intensive care units. Ensuring adequate training, fostering effective communication between clinicians and families, and maximizing collaboration and communication with the ICU team and other medical departments can facilitate prompt and effective decision-making regarding end-of-life care." @default.
• W4387265280 created "2023-10-03" @default.
• W4387265280 creator A5071839348 @default.
• W4387265280 creator A5057676552 @default.
• W4387265280 date "2023-09-22" @default.
• W4387265280 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W4387265280 title "Barriers to end-of-life decisions and care objectives in intensive care units" @default.
• W4387265280 doi "https://doi.org/10.51271/kmj-0111" @default.
• W4387265280 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4387265280 type Work @default.
• W4387265280 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4387265280 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4387265280 hasAuthorship W4387265280A5057676552 @default.
• W4387265280 hasAuthorship W4387265280A5071839348 @default.
• W4387265280 hasBestOaLocation W43872652801 @default.
• W4387265280 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W4387265280 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W4387265280 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W4387265280 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4387265280 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W4387265280 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W4387265280 hasConcept C2777834853 @default.
• W4387265280 hasConcept C2780409771 @default.
• W4387265280 hasConcept C2780879335 @default.
• W4387265280 hasConcept C2987404301 @default.
• W4387265280 hasConcept C2994186709 @default.
• W4387265280 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4387265280 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4387265280 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W4387265280 hasConceptScore W4387265280C10138342 @default.
• W4387265280 hasConceptScore W4387265280C111919701 @default.
• W4387265280 hasConceptScore W4387265280C144133560 @default.
• W4387265280 hasConceptScore W4387265280C15744967 @default.
• W4387265280 hasConceptScore W4387265280C159110408 @default.
• W4387265280 hasConceptScore W4387265280C177713679 @default.
• W4387265280 hasConceptScore W4387265280C2777834853 @default.
• W4387265280 hasConceptScore W4387265280C2780409771 @default.
• W4387265280 hasConceptScore W4387265280C2780879335 @default.
• W4387265280 hasConceptScore W4387265280C2987404301 @default.
• W4387265280 hasConceptScore W4387265280C2994186709 @default.
• W4387265280 hasConceptScore W4387265280C41008148 @default.
• W4387265280 hasConceptScore W4387265280C71924100 @default.
• W4387265280 hasConceptScore W4387265280C98045186 @default.
• W4387265280 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W4387265280 hasLocation W43872652801 @default.
• W4387265280 hasOpenAccess W4387265280 @default.
• W4387265280 hasPrimaryLocation W43872652801 @default.
• W4387265280 hasRelatedWork W1577422432 @default.
• W4387265280 hasRelatedWork W1998808158 @default.
• W4387265280 hasRelatedWork W2063646942 @default.
• W4387265280 hasRelatedWork W2772385150 @default.
• W4387265280 hasRelatedWork W3176009699 @default.
• W4387265280 hasRelatedWork W3203811449 @default.
• W4387265280 hasRelatedWork W4288050005 @default.
• W4387265280 hasRelatedWork W4306685847 @default.
• W4387265280 hasRelatedWork W66900065 @default.
• W4387265280 hasRelatedWork W2908431123 @default.
• W4387265280 hasVolume "3" @default.
• W4387265280 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4387265280 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4387265280 workType "article" @default.