FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4387272206> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4387272206 abstract "The University of Santo Tomas has decided to migrate their student information system over to the cloud. The Student Information System is part of the university's logistical infrastructure that allows administrators to keep track of student records. The aim is to explore other options that may better cater to the university's SIS system. The study explores Google Cloud Platform (GCP) as a competitor and compares it to Oracle Cloud. The study performs a partial replication of the OCI SIS development configuration done by the STePs and replicates the configuration over to the GCP. Several smokescreen tests are done to test the functionality of the 2 platforms and benchmark tests to analyze the performance of the 2 platforms. The data of the tests are then compared based on their functionality, efficiency, reliability, scalability, and security. With these comparisons, along with the provided documentations of the vendors, a feasibility is also performed. The feasibility study goes over the technical, economical, and operational feasibility of implementing either of the infrastructures as a service. The researchers were able to list which cloud platform performs better in each category and conclude which is the better performing cloud platform in specific categories and overall. With these findings the researchers were able to perform a feasibility study in terms of operational, technical, and economical. Based on the study, with regards to operational feasibility, Google Cloud Platform proves a better choice due to the better performance of their virtual machines. However, in terms of Database the Oracle Cloud Autonomous Database is greatly considered with it handling more transactions per second. With this, the researchers discussed the option for a hybrid implementation among the two platform's services. In terms of technical feasibility, Google Cloud Platform and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure are both functional and the tests prove they would work if needed. But with consideration of the benchmark results, the Google Cloud Platform proved to be the better choice. For economical feasibility, the Google Cloud Platform would be the better choice in terms of service provisions alone, with the assumption that the university does not go over 10 TB of data egress. But anything over the 10 TB of data egress, the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure would be the better option. These results are in respect and may vary over time depending on the currency exchange rate of the US Dollar and Philippine Peso." @default.
• W4387272206 created "2023-10-03" @default.
• W4387272206 creator A5092990084 @default.
• W4387272206 creator A5092990085 @default.
• W4387272206 creator A5092990086 @default.
• W4387272206 creator A5092990087 @default.
• W4387272206 date "2023-01-01" @default.
• W4387272206 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W4387272206 title "Comparative analysis of OCI and Google Cloud platform for the system of the University of Santo Tomas" @default.
• W4387272206 doi "https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2023.1766" @default.
• W4387272206 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4387272206 type Work @default.
• W4387272206 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4387272206 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W4387272206 hasAuthorship W4387272206A5092990084 @default.
• W4387272206 hasAuthorship W4387272206A5092990085 @default.
• W4387272206 hasAuthorship W4387272206A5092990086 @default.
• W4387272206 hasAuthorship W4387272206A5092990087 @default.
• W4387272206 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W4387272206 hasConcept C115903868 @default.
• W4387272206 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W4387272206 hasConcept C13280743 @default.
• W4387272206 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W4387272206 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W4387272206 hasConcept C185798385 @default.
• W4387272206 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W4387272206 hasConcept C2778974508 @default.
• W4387272206 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4387272206 hasConcept C43214815 @default.
• W4387272206 hasConcept C48044578 @default.
• W4387272206 hasConcept C55166926 @default.
• W4387272206 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W4387272206 hasConcept C77088390 @default.
• W4387272206 hasConcept C79974875 @default.
• W4387272206 hasConceptScore W4387272206C111919701 @default.
• W4387272206 hasConceptScore W4387272206C115903868 @default.
• W4387272206 hasConceptScore W4387272206C121332964 @default.
• W4387272206 hasConceptScore W4387272206C13280743 @default.
• W4387272206 hasConceptScore W4387272206C136764020 @default.
• W4387272206 hasConceptScore W4387272206C163258240 @default.
• W4387272206 hasConceptScore W4387272206C185798385 @default.
• W4387272206 hasConceptScore W4387272206C205649164 @default.
• W4387272206 hasConceptScore W4387272206C2778974508 @default.
• W4387272206 hasConceptScore W4387272206C41008148 @default.
• W4387272206 hasConceptScore W4387272206C43214815 @default.
• W4387272206 hasConceptScore W4387272206C48044578 @default.
• W4387272206 hasConceptScore W4387272206C55166926 @default.
• W4387272206 hasConceptScore W4387272206C62520636 @default.
• W4387272206 hasConceptScore W4387272206C77088390 @default.
• W4387272206 hasConceptScore W4387272206C79974875 @default.
• W4387272206 hasLocation W43872722061 @default.
• W4387272206 hasOpenAccess W4387272206 @default.
• W4387272206 hasPrimaryLocation W43872722061 @default.
• W4387272206 hasRelatedWork W112744582 @default.
• W4387272206 hasRelatedWork W1130177354 @default.
• W4387272206 hasRelatedWork W1967187851 @default.
• W4387272206 hasRelatedWork W2252042973 @default.
• W4387272206 hasRelatedWork W2522612997 @default.
• W4387272206 hasRelatedWork W2769758814 @default.
• W4387272206 hasRelatedWork W2973190448 @default.
• W4387272206 hasRelatedWork W3007123324 @default.
• W4387272206 hasRelatedWork W3135740393 @default.
• W4387272206 hasRelatedWork W78047038 @default.
• W4387272206 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4387272206 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4387272206 workType "article" @default.