FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4387348046> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4387348046 abstract "Objectives: Hearing aids are an essential and important part of hearing rehabilitation. The combination of technical data on hearing aids and individual rehabilitation needs can give insight into the factors that contribute to the success of rehabilitation. This study sets out to investigate if different subgroups of (comparable) hearing aids lead to differences in the success of rehabilitation, and whether these differences vary between different domains of auditory functioning. Design: This study explored the advantages of including patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the process of purchasing new hearing aids in a large sample of successful hearing aid users. Subject data were obtained from 64 (commercial) hearing aid dispensers and 10 (noncommercial) audiological centers in the Netherlands. The PROM was a 32-item questionnaire and was used to determine the success of rehabilitation using hearing aids by measuring auditory disability over time. The items were mapped on six domains of auditory functioning: detection, discrimination, localization, speech in quiet, speech in noise, and noise tolerance, encompassing a variety of daily-life listening situations. Hearing aids were grouped by means of cluster analysis, resulting in nine subgroups. In total, 1149 subjects were included in this study. A general linear model was used to model the final PROM results. Model results were analyzed via a multifactor Analysis of Variance. Post hoc analyses provided detailed information on model variables. Results: Results showed a strong statistically significant effect of hearing aids on self-perceived auditory functioning in general. Clinically relevant differences were found for auditory domains including detection, speech in quiet, speech in noise, and localization. There was only a small, but significant, effect of the different subgroups of hearing aids on the final PROM results, where no differences were found between the auditory domains. Minor differences were found between results obtained in commercial and noncommercial settings, or between novice and experienced users. Severity of Hearing loss, age, gender, and hearing aid style (i.e., behind-the-ear versus receiver-in-canal type) did not have a clinically relevant effect on the final PROM results. Conclusions: The use of hearing aids has a large positive effect on self-perceived auditory functioning. There was however no salient effect of the different subgroups of hearing aids on the final PROM results, indicating that technical properties of hearing aids only play a limited role in this respect. This study challenges the belief that premium devices outperform basic ones, highlighting the need for personalized rehabilitation strategies and the importance of evaluating factors contributing to successful rehabilitation for clinical practice." @default.
• W4387348046 created "2023-10-05" @default.
• W4387348046 creator A5053348185 @default.
• W4387348046 creator A5058533777 @default.
• W4387348046 creator A5083324465 @default.
• W4387348046 date "2023-06-09" @default.
• W4387348046 modified "2023-10-06" @default.
• W4387348046 title "Exploring Factors That Contribute to the Success of Rehabilitation With Hearing Aids" @default.
• W4387348046 cites W1578656156 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W1972092271 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W1978605716 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W1980909626 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W1990784680 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W1992268156 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W1996440955 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2003473452 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2003755151 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2006909257 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2015161957 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2028832299 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2030169919 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2039348510 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2042320031 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2044187763 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2047872922 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2051525838 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2072182534 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2079450009 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2081251342 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2089580701 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2091418557 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2102278044 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2117945314 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2123960195 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2129259613 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2129569400 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2133084664 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2135896320 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2138864685 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2150901644 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2151372580 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2161808166 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2187009308 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2200387680 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2200650653 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2211586339 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2321067190 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2343094848 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2516452768 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2588117022 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2603241318 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2605968239 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2621184040 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2735129593 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2752391626 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2774486220 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2891145746 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2896337239 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2899137987 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W2943107979 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W3007470668 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W3015151941 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W3018851425 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W3024157606 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W3037629089 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W3080501551 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W3092571812 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W3159170200 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W3164802344 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W4236641157 @default.
• W4387348046 cites W99755919 @default.
• W4387348046 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000001393" @default.
• W4387348046 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37792897" @default.
• W4387348046 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4387348046 type Work @default.
• W4387348046 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4387348046 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4387348046 hasAuthorship W4387348046A5053348185 @default.
• W4387348046 hasAuthorship W4387348046A5058533777 @default.
• W4387348046 hasAuthorship W4387348046A5083324465 @default.
• W4387348046 hasBestOaLocation W43873480461 @default.
• W4387348046 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W4387348046 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4387348046 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W4387348046 hasConcept C177291462 @default.
• W4387348046 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W4387348046 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W4387348046 hasConcept C2777185736 @default.
• W4387348046 hasConcept C2778818304 @default.
• W4387348046 hasConcept C2780493683 @default.
• W4387348046 hasConcept C2780801066 @default.
• W4387348046 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
• W4387348046 hasConcept C548259974 @default.
• W4387348046 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W4387348046 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4387348046 hasConcept C99209842 @default.
• W4387348046 hasConceptScore W4387348046C121332964 @default.
• W4387348046 hasConceptScore W4387348046C15744967 @default.
• W4387348046 hasConceptScore W4387348046C169760540 @default.
• W4387348046 hasConceptScore W4387348046C177291462 @default.

• next