FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4387360192> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4387360192 abstract "<sec> <title>BACKGROUND</title> Research exploring perspectives on inpatient portals reports patients desire the informational affordances of inpatient portals and clinicians recognize their value for improving patient experience but also express caution regarding sharing aspects of the medical record. This study that explores the psychosocial dimension of clinician resistance to informational affordances and considers the power dynamic associated with the clinician-patient information asymmetry, provides a significant contribution to existing literature on inpatient portals. Along with the informational affordances commonly discussed in this area, including access to notes and test results, this study explores perspectives on the option to audio record consultations via an inpatient portal. To our knowledge, this is the first study in Australia to explore patient, proxy, and clinician perspectives on an inpatient portal. </sec> <sec> <title>OBJECTIVE</title> This study aims to understand patient, proxy, and clinician perspectives on the value and impact of an inpatient portal within the Australian context. It explores clinician resistance and receptivity to sharing aspects of the medical record with patients and provides insight on the power dynamic that characterizes the relationship between clinician and patient. It highlights the potential of an inpatient portal to assist in the transformation of this relationship such that this relationship could be characterized by greater information symmetry. </sec> <sec> <title>METHODS</title> Interviews were conducted with patients (n=20), proxies (n=4) and clinicians (n=21) recruited from three areas within the Royal Melbourne Hospital where the portal would later be piloted. A largely inductive reflexive thematic analysis was conducted. </sec> <sec> <title>RESULTS</title> Patient and proxy participants reported that they need to understand what is happening in their care for peace of mind and that an inpatient portal could support this understanding. Clinician participants understood the benefit of the portal but also expressed caution regarding certain information sharing. Participants considered what types of information could be shared, and how this information could be shared via an inpatient portal. This study provided clinician participants the opportunity to reflect upon how they might transform their information sharing practice to provide greater transparency in their relationship with patients. Four key themes were generated: 1. Affording the patient/proxy awareness, control, and reassurance through sharing accessible and meaningful information; 2. Protecting the clinician and safeguarding quality healthcare in information sharing; 3. Flexibly deploying the functions depending upon clinician, patient/proxy, and context; 4. Towards person-centered care: empowerment and equity via an inpatient portal. </sec> <sec> <title>CONCLUSIONS</title> An inpatient portal provides an opportunity to reconceptualize the medical record and how this information might be shared with the patient whilst they are admitted such that they have more understanding as to what is happening in their care, which ultimately supports their wellbeing. The transition to a more transparent information sharing culture in the Australian hospital context will take time. An inpatient portal is a critical step in facilitating this transition and in creating more information symmetry in the clinician-patient relationship. </sec>" @default.
• W4387360192 created "2023-10-06" @default.
• W4387360192 creator A5007921114 @default.
• W4387360192 creator A5033575514 @default.
• W4387360192 creator A5068322710 @default.
• W4387360192 creator A5075208582 @default.
• W4387360192 date "2023-10-04" @default.
• W4387360192 modified "2023-10-06" @default.
• W4387360192 title "Exploring patient, proxy, and clinician perspectives on the value and impact of an inpatient portal: A qualitative study (Preprint)" @default.
• W4387360192 cites W4386725501 @default.
• W4387360192 doi "https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.52703" @default.
• W4387360192 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4387360192 type Work @default.
• W4387360192 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4387360192 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W4387360192 hasAuthorship W4387360192A5007921114 @default.
• W4387360192 hasAuthorship W4387360192A5033575514 @default.
• W4387360192 hasAuthorship W4387360192A5068322710 @default.
• W4387360192 hasAuthorship W4387360192A5075208582 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConcept C150966472 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConcept C190248442 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConcept C194995250 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConcept C2776153502 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConcept C2780148112 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConcept C74196892 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConceptScore W4387360192C118552586 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConceptScore W4387360192C119857082 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConceptScore W4387360192C144024400 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConceptScore W4387360192C150966472 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConceptScore W4387360192C151730666 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConceptScore W4387360192C15744967 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConceptScore W4387360192C160735492 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConceptScore W4387360192C17744445 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConceptScore W4387360192C180747234 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConceptScore W4387360192C190248442 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConceptScore W4387360192C194995250 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConceptScore W4387360192C199539241 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConceptScore W4387360192C2776153502 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConceptScore W4387360192C2779343474 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConceptScore W4387360192C2780148112 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConceptScore W4387360192C36289849 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConceptScore W4387360192C41008148 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConceptScore W4387360192C509550671 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConceptScore W4387360192C512399662 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConceptScore W4387360192C71924100 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConceptScore W4387360192C74196892 @default.
• W4387360192 hasConceptScore W4387360192C86803240 @default.
• W4387360192 hasLocation W43873601921 @default.
• W4387360192 hasOpenAccess W4387360192 @default.
• W4387360192 hasPrimaryLocation W43873601921 @default.
• W4387360192 hasRelatedWork W1541884709 @default.
• W4387360192 hasRelatedWork W1791514435 @default.
• W4387360192 hasRelatedWork W1972718289 @default.
• W4387360192 hasRelatedWork W2070708245 @default.
• W4387360192 hasRelatedWork W2248634132 @default.
• W4387360192 hasRelatedWork W2295809616 @default.
• W4387360192 hasRelatedWork W2346831895 @default.
• W4387360192 hasRelatedWork W2589081601 @default.
• W4387360192 hasRelatedWork W3001814894 @default.
• W4387360192 hasRelatedWork W3049116993 @default.
• W4387360192 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4387360192 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4387360192 workType "article" @default.