FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4387396910> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4387396910 abstract "Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy has been proposed as an alternative strategy for treating appendicitis, but debate exists on its role compared with conventional treatment.This systematic review was performed on MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE. The last search was in April of 2023. The risk ratio with a 95% confidence interval was calculated for dichotomous variables, and the mean difference with a 95% confidence interval for continuous variables. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool (randomized controlled trials) and the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Intervention tool (non-randomized controlled trials).Six studies met the eligibility criteria. Four studies compared endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (n = 236 patients) and appendectomy (n = 339) and found no differences in technical success during index admission (risk ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval [0.92,1.02]). Appendectomy showed superior outcomes for recurrence at 1-year follow-up (risk ratio 11.28, 95% confidence interval [2.61,48.73]). Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy required shorter procedural time (mean difference -14.38, 95% confidence interval [-20.17, -8.59]) and length of hospital stay (mean difference -1.19, 95% confidence interval [-2.37, -0.01]), with lower post-intervention abdominal pain (risk ratio 0.21, 95% confidence interval [0.14,0.32]). Two studies compared endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (n = 269) and antibiotic treatment (n = 280). Technical success during admission (risk ratio 1.11, 95% confidence interval [0.91,1.35]) and appendicitis recurrence (risk ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval [0.08,14.87]) did not differ, but endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy decreased the length of hospitalization (mean difference -1.91, 95% confidence interval [-3.18, -0.64]).This meta-analysis did not identify significant differences between endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy and appendectomy or antibiotics regarding technical success during index admission and treatment efficacy at 1-year follow-up. However, a high risk of imprecision limits these results. The advantages of endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy in terms of reduced procedural times and shorter lengths of stay must be balanced against the increased risk of having an appendicitis recurrence at one year." @default.
• W4387396910 created "2023-10-07" @default.
• W4387396910 creator A5009466301 @default.
• W4387396910 creator A5015159811 @default.
• W4387396910 creator A5023942125 @default.
• W4387396910 creator A5024736625 @default.
• W4387396910 creator A5025477965 @default.
• W4387396910 creator A5053830787 @default.
• W4387396910 creator A5055135823 @default.
• W4387396910 creator A5063622546 @default.
• W4387396910 creator A5073254190 @default.
• W4387396910 creator A5076107546 @default.
• W4387396910 creator A5088769685 @default.
• W4387396910 date "2023-10-01" @default.
• W4387396910 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4387396910 title "Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy versus appendectomy or antibiotics in the modern approach to uncomplicated acute appendicitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis" @default.
• W4387396910 cites W1537972189 @default.
• W4387396910 cites W1979423827 @default.
• W4387396910 cites W1982095438 @default.
• W4387396910 cites W2060940910 @default.
• W4387396910 cites W2098176817 @default.
• W4387396910 cites W2129212517 @default.
• W4387396910 cites W2156874758 @default.
• W4387396910 cites W2406666527 @default.
• W4387396910 cites W2531269403 @default.
• W4387396910 cites W2756578555 @default.
• W4387396910 cites W2783188155 @default.
• W4387396910 cites W2894194385 @default.
• W4387396910 cites W2908015704 @default.
• W4387396910 cites W2914862116 @default.
• W4387396910 cites W2970684805 @default.
• W4387396910 cites W2997823537 @default.
• W4387396910 cites W3017264036 @default.
• W4387396910 cites W3095407790 @default.
• W4387396910 cites W3118615836 @default.
• W4387396910 cites W3155961534 @default.
• W4387396910 cites W3160011628 @default.
• W4387396910 cites W3188643302 @default.
• W4387396910 cites W3208303395 @default.
• W4387396910 cites W3217737187 @default.
• W4387396910 cites W4205445740 @default.
• W4387396910 cites W4213054422 @default.
• W4387396910 cites W4226030247 @default.
• W4387396910 cites W4226499494 @default.
• W4387396910 cites W4231356340 @default.
• W4387396910 cites W4245379858 @default.
• W4387396910 cites W4319294420 @default.
• W4387396910 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2023.08.029" @default.
• W4387396910 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37806859" @default.
• W4387396910 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4387396910 type Work @default.
• W4387396910 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4387396910 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4387396910 hasAuthorship W4387396910A5009466301 @default.
• W4387396910 hasAuthorship W4387396910A5015159811 @default.
• W4387396910 hasAuthorship W4387396910A5023942125 @default.
• W4387396910 hasAuthorship W4387396910A5024736625 @default.
• W4387396910 hasAuthorship W4387396910A5025477965 @default.
• W4387396910 hasAuthorship W4387396910A5053830787 @default.
• W4387396910 hasAuthorship W4387396910A5055135823 @default.
• W4387396910 hasAuthorship W4387396910A5063622546 @default.
• W4387396910 hasAuthorship W4387396910A5073254190 @default.
• W4387396910 hasAuthorship W4387396910A5076107546 @default.
• W4387396910 hasAuthorship W4387396910A5088769685 @default.
• W4387396910 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4387396910 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4387396910 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W4387396910 hasConcept C2780016130 @default.
• W4387396910 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W4387396910 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4387396910 hasConcept C82789193 @default.
• W4387396910 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W4387396910 hasConceptScore W4387396910C126322002 @default.
• W4387396910 hasConceptScore W4387396910C141071460 @default.
• W4387396910 hasConceptScore W4387396910C168563851 @default.
• W4387396910 hasConceptScore W4387396910C2780016130 @default.
• W4387396910 hasConceptScore W4387396910C44249647 @default.
• W4387396910 hasConceptScore W4387396910C71924100 @default.
• W4387396910 hasConceptScore W4387396910C82789193 @default.
• W4387396910 hasConceptScore W4387396910C95190672 @default.
• W4387396910 hasLocation W43873969101 @default.
• W4387396910 hasLocation W43873969102 @default.
• W4387396910 hasOpenAccess W4387396910 @default.
• W4387396910 hasPrimaryLocation W43873969101 @default.
• W4387396910 hasRelatedWork W1539974851 @default.
• W4387396910 hasRelatedWork W2083188054 @default.
• W4387396910 hasRelatedWork W2112436308 @default.
• W4387396910 hasRelatedWork W2355769538 @default.
• W4387396910 hasRelatedWork W2362391294 @default.
• W4387396910 hasRelatedWork W2373885168 @default.
• W4387396910 hasRelatedWork W2611523470 @default.
• W4387396910 hasRelatedWork W2939697310 @default.
• W4387396910 hasRelatedWork W2956460282 @default.
• W4387396910 hasRelatedWork W3139914494 @default.
• W4387396910 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4387396910 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4387396910 workType "article" @default.