FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4387520904> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4387520904 abstract "Abstract Background Causal therapies are not yet available for most neuromuscular diseases. Additionally, data on the use of complementary or alternative therapies (CAM) in patients groups with a variety of different neuromuscular diseases are rare. This retrospective cross-sectional study aims to record the frequency of use and satisfaction of conventional therapies and complementary or alternative medicine (CAM) in patients with neuromuscular disorders in order to compare them afterwards. Methods Patients from the University of Leipzig (Department and Outpatient Department of Neurology), the Friedrich-Baur-Institute (Department of Neurology), the Hoher Meißner Clinic (Department of Neurology) and the German Society for Muscular Diseases (DGM e.V.) were included. The focus of this study has been on patients with chronic neuromuscular diseases. Our data are based on standardised questionnaires in analogue form from three German neuromuscular centres and in digital form from the official website of the German Society for Muscular Diseases. Therapy satisfaction was assessed with the Patient Evaluation of Global Response (PEGR) ranking scale (very satisfactory + 2 to very unsatisfactory − 2). Results Of 192 questionnaires analysed, the most common diagnoses were spinal muscular atrophy (n = 42; 21.9%), muscular dystrophies (n = 41; 21.4%) and myotonic dystrophies (n = 38; 19.8%). More than half (n = 112; 58.3%) used both conventional and CAM treatments. Physiotherapy (n = 165) was used most frequently within all treatments with conventional manual (PEGR 1.25, p = 0.013; CI 95%) and aquatic therapy (PEGR 1.3, p = 0.038) showing significantly higher satisfaction compared to therapy on training equipment. Less-used therapies such as psychotherapy (n = 53; PEGR 1.2) were also satisfactory. Within CAM, massages (n = 96) were the most reported and meditation (PEGR 1.5) was best rated. Massage therapy was significantly more satisfactory than progressive muscle relaxation ( p = 0.003) and chiropractic treatment ( p = 0.036). Chiropractic treatment (PEGR − 0.1) was rated most negatively. No significant differences were found between the group of conventional therapies and CAM users regarding social and disease-dependent factors. Conclusions Treatment with conventional therapy (manual, aquatic therapy) and some CAM therapies can be recommended if adequately indicated." @default.
• W4387520904 created "2023-10-12" @default.
• W4387520904 creator A5010147594 @default.
• W4387520904 creator A5011121650 @default.
• W4387520904 creator A5018656990 @default.
• W4387520904 creator A5024797518 @default.
• W4387520904 creator A5031282936 @default.
• W4387520904 date "2023-10-12" @default.
• W4387520904 modified "2023-10-13" @default.
• W4387520904 title "Frequency and satisfaction of conventional and complementary or alternative therapies for neuromuscular disorders" @default.
• W4387520904 cites W1973184645 @default.
• W4387520904 cites W2009444028 @default.
• W4387520904 cites W2036600826 @default.
• W4387520904 cites W2054501246 @default.
• W4387520904 cites W2061853984 @default.
• W4387520904 cites W2104733189 @default.
• W4387520904 cites W2106577647 @default.
• W4387520904 cites W2108730127 @default.
• W4387520904 cites W2112088545 @default.
• W4387520904 cites W2130211023 @default.
• W4387520904 cites W2158201160 @default.
• W4387520904 cites W2166774924 @default.
• W4387520904 cites W2316614045 @default.
• W4387520904 cites W2344606133 @default.
• W4387520904 cites W2499842962 @default.
• W4387520904 cites W2783797058 @default.
• W4387520904 cites W2809235578 @default.
• W4387520904 cites W2811311101 @default.
• W4387520904 cites W2889916854 @default.
• W4387520904 cites W2898419119 @default.
• W4387520904 cites W2955708235 @default.
• W4387520904 cites W2971618647 @default.
• W4387520904 cites W2977242495 @default.
• W4387520904 cites W3011397292 @default.
• W4387520904 cites W3035360991 @default.
• W4387520904 cites W327056331 @default.
• W4387520904 cites W4238626336 @default.
• W4387520904 cites W4293306544 @default.
• W4387520904 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-023-00281-5" @default.
• W4387520904 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37822002" @default.
• W4387520904 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4387520904 type Work @default.
• W4387520904 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4387520904 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4387520904 hasAuthorship W4387520904A5010147594 @default.
• W4387520904 hasAuthorship W4387520904A5011121650 @default.
• W4387520904 hasAuthorship W4387520904A5018656990 @default.
• W4387520904 hasAuthorship W4387520904A5024797518 @default.
• W4387520904 hasAuthorship W4387520904A5031282936 @default.
• W4387520904 hasBestOaLocation W43875209041 @default.
• W4387520904 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W4387520904 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4387520904 hasConcept C154775046 @default.
• W4387520904 hasConcept C16568411 @default.
• W4387520904 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W4387520904 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W4387520904 hasConcept C2776767690 @default.
• W4387520904 hasConcept C2778063965 @default.
• W4387520904 hasConcept C2778558090 @default.
• W4387520904 hasConcept C2779134260 @default.
• W4387520904 hasConcept C2780304057 @default.
• W4387520904 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4387520904 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W4387520904 hasConcept C99508421 @default.
• W4387520904 hasConceptScore W4387520904C118552586 @default.
• W4387520904 hasConceptScore W4387520904C126322002 @default.
• W4387520904 hasConceptScore W4387520904C154775046 @default.
• W4387520904 hasConceptScore W4387520904C16568411 @default.
• W4387520904 hasConceptScore W4387520904C166957645 @default.
• W4387520904 hasConceptScore W4387520904C1862650 @default.
• W4387520904 hasConceptScore W4387520904C2776767690 @default.
• W4387520904 hasConceptScore W4387520904C2778063965 @default.
• W4387520904 hasConceptScore W4387520904C2778558090 @default.
• W4387520904 hasConceptScore W4387520904C2779134260 @default.
• W4387520904 hasConceptScore W4387520904C2780304057 @default.
• W4387520904 hasConceptScore W4387520904C71924100 @default.
• W4387520904 hasConceptScore W4387520904C95457728 @default.
• W4387520904 hasConceptScore W4387520904C99508421 @default.
• W4387520904 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W4387520904 hasLocation W43875209041 @default.
• W4387520904 hasLocation W43875209042 @default.
• W4387520904 hasOpenAccess W4387520904 @default.
• W4387520904 hasPrimaryLocation W43875209041 @default.
• W4387520904 hasRelatedWork W2029555265 @default.
• W4387520904 hasRelatedWork W2055529375 @default.
• W4387520904 hasRelatedWork W2084755199 @default.
• W4387520904 hasRelatedWork W2090334162 @default.
• W4387520904 hasRelatedWork W2098214510 @default.
• W4387520904 hasRelatedWork W2119669717 @default.
• W4387520904 hasRelatedWork W2226574669 @default.
• W4387520904 hasRelatedWork W2331968304 @default.
• W4387520904 hasRelatedWork W2424603415 @default.
• W4387520904 hasRelatedWork W4285687296 @default.
• W4387520904 hasVolume "5" @default.
• W4387520904 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4387520904 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4387520904 workType "article" @default.