FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4387586815> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4387586815 endingPage "366" @default.
• W4387586815 startingPage "363" @default.
• W4387586815 abstract "Abstract Background: Radiofrequency (RF) surgery is an office-based procedure in the treatment of various skin conditions. It has the advantage of having both cut and coagulation modes, making the surgery easy, fast, effective, and cheaper, and causes minimal collateral thermal damage, resulting in rapid healing and esthetically pleasant scars. Objective: The present study was a clinical audit done with the aim to improve the quality of practice for RF electrocautery in the outpatient department (OPD) setup. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective clinical audit of patients coming to skin OPD requiring electrocauterization from August 2019 to October 2019. To assess and monitor the patients going for electrocautery, a pro forma was filled about the indication of electrocautery. Requirements and guidelines followed or not during pre- and postoperative preparation were also tabulated. During the procedure, details such as type of electrode, mode and power of electrocautery, wiping of electrode between each use, continuous activation of foot switch, and waiting period between two passages were also noted. Ratios, proportions, and percentages were used to describe the data. Results: A total of 30 patients were enrolled of which 24 were male (80%) and 6 were female (20%). The most common indication was skin tags seen in 21 participants (70%), followed by warts in 6 (20%) and seborrheic keratosis in 3 (10%) patients. Proper counseling and explanation were done in all the patients (100%). Each cautery was performed with clean surroundings (100%). During the procedure, 24 patients (80%) were given injectable local anesthetics. The electrode used was a long sharp tip electrode in all the procedures and the most common power of instrument used was 0.5 (70%). After each use, wiping of electrode was done in 24 (80%) patients. Three patients were on aspirin (10%) and one had a keloidal tendency (3.33%) which was missed while taking history. Conclusion: Educational interventions among doctors as well as students should be carried out to sensitize them about the standard guidelines of using electrocautery for better results." @default.
• W4387586815 created "2023-10-13" @default.
• W4387586815 creator A5009062802 @default.
• W4387586815 creator A5027660207 @default.
• W4387586815 creator A5035535798 @default.
• W4387586815 creator A5047047917 @default.
• W4387586815 creator A5080870520 @default.
• W4387586815 date "2023-01-01" @default.
• W4387586815 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4387586815 title "Clinical Audit of Radiofrequency Electrocautery Procedure at Dermatology Department of a Tertiary Care Teaching Center" @default.
• W4387586815 cites W1969397597 @default.
• W4387586815 cites W2149604734 @default.
• W4387586815 cites W4253727383 @default.
• W4387586815 doi "https://doi.org/10.4103/cdr.cdr_56_22" @default.
• W4387586815 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4387586815 type Work @default.
• W4387586815 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4387586815 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4387586815 hasAuthorship W4387586815A5009062802 @default.
• W4387586815 hasAuthorship W4387586815A5027660207 @default.
• W4387586815 hasAuthorship W4387586815A5035535798 @default.
• W4387586815 hasAuthorship W4387586815A5047047917 @default.
• W4387586815 hasAuthorship W4387586815A5080870520 @default.
• W4387586815 hasBestOaLocation W43875868151 @default.
• W4387586815 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W4387586815 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W4387586815 hasConcept C16005928 @default.
• W4387586815 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W4387586815 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W4387586815 hasConcept C199521495 @default.
• W4387586815 hasConcept C2777642821 @default.
• W4387586815 hasConcept C2777828583 @default.
• W4387586815 hasConcept C3020110884 @default.
• W4387586815 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4387586815 hasConceptScore W4387586815C126322002 @default.
• W4387586815 hasConceptScore W4387586815C141071460 @default.
• W4387586815 hasConceptScore W4387586815C16005928 @default.
• W4387586815 hasConceptScore W4387586815C162324750 @default.
• W4387586815 hasConceptScore W4387586815C187736073 @default.
• W4387586815 hasConceptScore W4387586815C199521495 @default.
• W4387586815 hasConceptScore W4387586815C2777642821 @default.
• W4387586815 hasConceptScore W4387586815C2777828583 @default.
• W4387586815 hasConceptScore W4387586815C3020110884 @default.
• W4387586815 hasConceptScore W4387586815C71924100 @default.
• W4387586815 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W4387586815 hasLocation W43875868151 @default.
• W4387586815 hasOpenAccess W4387586815 @default.
• W4387586815 hasPrimaryLocation W43875868151 @default.
• W4387586815 hasRelatedWork W2041423577 @default.
• W4387586815 hasRelatedWork W2153962542 @default.
• W4387586815 hasRelatedWork W2348938370 @default.
• W4387586815 hasRelatedWork W2364286254 @default.
• W4387586815 hasRelatedWork W2390725462 @default.
• W4387586815 hasRelatedWork W2417094457 @default.
• W4387586815 hasRelatedWork W2422324476 @default.
• W4387586815 hasRelatedWork W2528276142 @default.
• W4387586815 hasRelatedWork W2793691980 @default.
• W4387586815 hasRelatedWork W2988740453 @default.
• W4387586815 hasVolume "7" @default.
• W4387586815 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4387586815 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4387586815 workType "article" @default.