FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4387607854> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4387607854 abstract "School Science and MathematicsEarly View EDITORIAL Engaging hearts and minds in assessment and validation research Jonathan D. Bostic, Corresponding Author Jonathan D. Bostic [email protected] Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio, USA Correspondence Jonathan D. Bostic, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, USA. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Jonathan D. Bostic, Corresponding Author Jonathan D. Bostic [email protected] Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio, USA Correspondence Jonathan D. Bostic, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, USA. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 12 October 2023 https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12621 Ideas in this work stem from multiple grant-funded research studies supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF# 1720646; 1920621; 2100988; 2201165). Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed by the authors do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. REFERENCES American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association. Bostic, J. (2017). Moving forward: Instruments and opportunities for aligning current practices with testing standards. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 9(3), 109–110. Bostic, J. (2019). We can do better! Intersection Points, 44(6), 3–4. Bostic, J. (2021). Think alouds: Informing scholarship and broadening partnerships through assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 34(1), 1–9. Bostic, J., Lesseig, K., Sherman, M., & Boston, M. (2021). Classroom observation and mathematics education research. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 24, 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-019-09445-0 Carney, M., Bostic, J., Krupa, E., & Shih, J. (2022). Interpretation and use statements for instruments in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 53(4), 334–340. Cronbach, L. J. (1988). Five perspectives on validity argument. In H. Wainer & H. Braun (Eds.), Test Validity (pp. 3–17). Erlbaum. Folger, T., Bostic, J., & Krupa, E. (2023). Defining test-score interpretation, use, and claims: Delphi study for the validity argument. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 42(3), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12569 Jonson, J. L., & Geisinger, K. F. (2022). Fairness in educational and psychological testing: Examining theoretical, research, practice, and policy implications of the 2014 standards. AERA. Kane, M. T. (2013). Validating the interpretations and uses of test scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 50(1), 1–73. Krupa, E., Carney, M., & Bostic, J. (2019). Approaches to instrument validation. Applied Measurement in Education, 32(1), 1–9. Lavery, M., Jong, C., Krupa, E., & Bostic, J. (2019). Developing an assessment with validity in mind. In J. Bostic, E. Krupa, & J. Shih (Eds.), Assessment in mathematics education contexts: Theoretical frameworks and new directions (pp. 12–39). Routledge. Melhuish, K., & Hicks, M. (2019). A validity argument for an undergraduate mathematics concept inventory. In J. Bostic, E. Krupa, & J. Shih (Eds.), Quantitative measures of mathematical knowledge: Research instruments and perspectives (pp. 121–151). Routledge. National Research Council. (2001). Knowing what students know. Committee on the foundations of assessment. National Academies Press. Padilla, J.-L., & Benitez, I. (2014). Validity evidence based on response process. Psichotherma, 26(1), 136–144. Shepard, L. A. (2016). Evaluating test validity: Reprise and progress. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, & Practice, 23(2), 268–280. Wilson, M., & Wilmot, D. (2019). Gathering validity evidence using the BEAR assessment system (BAS): A mathematics assessment perspective. In J. Bostic, E. Krupa, & J. Shih (Eds.), Assessment in mathematics education contexts: Theoretical frameworks and new directions (pp. 63–89). Routledge. Early ViewOnline Version of Record before inclusion in an issue ReferencesRelatedInformation" @default.
• W4387607854 created "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4387607854 creator A5087195156 @default.
• W4387607854 date "2023-10-12" @default.
• W4387607854 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4387607854 title "Engaging hearts and minds in assessment and validation research" @default.
• W4387607854 cites W1704942559 @default.
• W4387607854 cites W2471994660 @default.
• W4387607854 cites W2770486036 @default.
• W4387607854 cites W2914370742 @default.
• W4387607854 cites W2943680403 @default.
• W4387607854 cites W2959474605 @default.
• W4387607854 cites W2961566786 @default.
• W4387607854 cites W2972559178 @default.
• W4387607854 cites W3127109964 @default.
• W4387607854 cites W4289532091 @default.
• W4387607854 cites W4382402587 @default.
• W4387607854 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12621" @default.
• W4387607854 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4387607854 type Work @default.
• W4387607854 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4387607854 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4387607854 hasAuthorship W4387607854A5087195156 @default.
• W4387607854 hasBestOaLocation W43876078541 @default.
• W4387607854 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W4387607854 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4387607854 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W4387607854 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W4387607854 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4387607854 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4387607854 hasConcept C2778805511 @default.
• W4387607854 hasConcept C2780966255 @default.
• W4387607854 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4387607854 hasConcept C48103436 @default.
• W4387607854 hasConceptScore W4387607854C11413529 @default.
• W4387607854 hasConceptScore W4387607854C144024400 @default.
• W4387607854 hasConceptScore W4387607854C15744967 @default.
• W4387607854 hasConceptScore W4387607854C161191863 @default.
• W4387607854 hasConceptScore W4387607854C17744445 @default.
• W4387607854 hasConceptScore W4387607854C199539241 @default.
• W4387607854 hasConceptScore W4387607854C2778805511 @default.
• W4387607854 hasConceptScore W4387607854C2780966255 @default.
• W4387607854 hasConceptScore W4387607854C41008148 @default.
• W4387607854 hasConceptScore W4387607854C48103436 @default.
• W4387607854 hasFunder F4320306076 @default.
• W4387607854 hasLocation W43876078541 @default.
• W4387607854 hasOpenAccess W4387607854 @default.
• W4387607854 hasPrimaryLocation W43876078541 @default.
• W4387607854 hasRelatedWork W2035483685 @default.
• W4387607854 hasRelatedWork W2220552745 @default.
• W4387607854 hasRelatedWork W2332779545 @default.
• W4387607854 hasRelatedWork W2358060160 @default.
• W4387607854 hasRelatedWork W2381393187 @default.
• W4387607854 hasRelatedWork W2501983714 @default.
• W4387607854 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W4387607854 hasRelatedWork W2790569960 @default.
• W4387607854 hasRelatedWork W2793937822 @default.
• W4387607854 hasRelatedWork W596947562 @default.
• W4387607854 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4387607854 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4387607854 workType "article" @default.