FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4387617360> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4387617360 endingPage "94" @default.
• W4387617360 startingPage "89" @default.
• W4387617360 abstract "The article analyzes John Locke’s political and legal views on the system of checks and balances, which is reflected in the thinker’s concept of the distribution of power. It is noted that in modern conditions of active modernization of political and legal processes, the study and generalization of experience in the field of public administration is of great importance. Considerable attention is paid to the characteristics of the evolution of political and legal views of the New Age, in particular, political and legal teachings in England. On the territory of England in the 17th century. absolutist theories justified the rule of the «Divine Rights of Kings», revived the ideology of royalism, which criticized the revolution in the name of the foundations of absolutism, referring to traditions and the old constitution of England, which the parliament wanted to abolish. In the course of these changes, the main role was played by the act of the English Parliament of 1689 on limiting the rights of the king, commonly known as the «Bill of Rights». The ideological justification of this act was the doctrine of the famous philosopher John Locke. The article describes certain positions of John Locke set forth in his landmark work «Two Treatises of Government» (1690), thanks to which he is considered the father of political liberalism. This work is divided into two parts, it is in the second part that the author reveals a number of important questions and judgments, starting with the image of the so-called «state of nature», where people are not obliged to obey each other, but everyone decides for himself what he requires law of nature John Locke also reveals his own system of views regarding the origin of the state, its role and significance in society. To study the contribution of John Locke to the political and legal sphere of England at the time and the world, in particular, modern political and legal science, one should stop at the study of part of the doctrine of John Locke, namely the foundations of the implementation of the system of checks and balances, which were laid by him in the concept of the concept of the separation of powers. This article also discusses the fact that the goal of the system of separation of branches of power, as a political and legal phenomenon, is the implementation of preventing the concentration of power in a certain state body by organizing and ensuring the operation of the system of checks and balances." @default.
• W4387617360 created "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4387617360 creator A5034000845 @default.
• W4387617360 date "2023-10-09" @default.
• W4387617360 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W4387617360 title "The concept of the model system of checks and balances in the political and legal teachings of John Locke" @default.
• W4387617360 doi "https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2023.79.1.14" @default.
• W4387617360 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4387617360 type Work @default.
• W4387617360 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4387617360 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4387617360 hasAuthorship W4387617360A5034000845 @default.
• W4387617360 hasBestOaLocation W43876173601 @default.
• W4387617360 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W4387617360 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W4387617360 hasConcept C143081792 @default.
• W4387617360 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4387617360 hasConcept C158071213 @default.
• W4387617360 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W4387617360 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4387617360 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W4387617360 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4387617360 hasConcept C2776154427 @default.
• W4387617360 hasConcept C2776211767 @default.
• W4387617360 hasConcept C2781440851 @default.
• W4387617360 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W4387617360 hasConcept C48103436 @default.
• W4387617360 hasConcept C547727832 @default.
• W4387617360 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W4387617360 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W4387617360 hasConceptScore W4387617360C11413529 @default.
• W4387617360 hasConceptScore W4387617360C121332964 @default.
• W4387617360 hasConceptScore W4387617360C143081792 @default.
• W4387617360 hasConceptScore W4387617360C144024400 @default.
• W4387617360 hasConceptScore W4387617360C158071213 @default.
• W4387617360 hasConceptScore W4387617360C163258240 @default.
• W4387617360 hasConceptScore W4387617360C17744445 @default.
• W4387617360 hasConceptScore W4387617360C190253527 @default.
• W4387617360 hasConceptScore W4387617360C199539241 @default.
• W4387617360 hasConceptScore W4387617360C2776154427 @default.
• W4387617360 hasConceptScore W4387617360C2776211767 @default.
• W4387617360 hasConceptScore W4387617360C2781440851 @default.
• W4387617360 hasConceptScore W4387617360C41008148 @default.
• W4387617360 hasConceptScore W4387617360C48103436 @default.
• W4387617360 hasConceptScore W4387617360C547727832 @default.
• W4387617360 hasConceptScore W4387617360C62520636 @default.
• W4387617360 hasConceptScore W4387617360C94625758 @default.
• W4387617360 hasIssue "79" @default.
• W4387617360 hasLocation W43876173601 @default.
• W4387617360 hasOpenAccess W4387617360 @default.
• W4387617360 hasPrimaryLocation W43876173601 @default.
• W4387617360 hasRelatedWork W2023822311 @default.
• W4387617360 hasRelatedWork W2254312451 @default.
• W4387617360 hasRelatedWork W2375791221 @default.
• W4387617360 hasRelatedWork W2377157123 @default.
• W4387617360 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W4387617360 hasRelatedWork W4252661029 @default.
• W4387617360 hasRelatedWork W4312908577 @default.
• W4387617360 hasRelatedWork W4365503523 @default.
• W4387617360 hasRelatedWork W589623597 @default.
• W4387617360 hasRelatedWork W2097613883 @default.
• W4387617360 hasVolume "1" @default.
• W4387617360 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4387617360 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4387617360 workType "article" @default.