FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4387618064> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4387618064 endingPage "6674" @default.
• W4387618064 startingPage "6674" @default.
• W4387618064 abstract "Introduction: Several advantages, including improved aesthetics and conservative cavity preparation, made resin-based composite (RBC) a popular restorative material. However, several limitations come with RBC restorations such as the necessity for proper isolation of the tooth and an incremental layering for the material due to the limitations of the depth of cure. Despite these advantages and limitations, the usage of these restorative materials is increasingly being expanded due to the advancement made since their introduction. To overcome some of the limitations, several types of RBC restorations were developed. Materials and Methods: Four different RBC materials used for class II restorations in primary and permanent teeth were compared: Z350 XT Filtek™ Universal Restorative (ZXT), Filtek™ Bulk Fill Flowable Restorative (FBF), Beautifil-Bulk Flowable (BBF) and Tetric™ N-Flow (TNF). Flexure strength, elastic modulus, surface roughness, microhardness and microleakage were assessed using standard methods or previously published protocols. The data and differences between the groups were analyzed using One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Tukey’s multiple comparisons, Kruskal–Wallis and Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann–Whitney) tests. Results: The study found that BBF (86.24 ± 7.41 MPa) and ZXT (64.45 ± 11.52 MPa) had higher flexural strength than FBF (50.89 ± 8.44 MPa) and TNF (50.67 ± 9.40 MPa), while both exhibited the highest values of surface roughness. Elastic modulus was the highest with BBF, which was not statistically significant from FBF or ZXT (p > 0.05). ZXT (109.7 ± 7.83 VH) exhibited the highest value of microhardness, which was statistically significant from the other three materials (p < 0.0001). Microleakage was assessed after thermocycling for 20,000 cycles to simulate two years in the mouth. FBF (70%) exhibited the most resistance to microleakage. Conclusions: Different types of RBC restorations exhibit different characteristics. The clinician needs to choose the most appropriate restorative material based on different clinical scenarios." @default.
• W4387618064 created "2023-10-14" @default.
• W4387618064 creator A5002843464 @default.
• W4387618064 creator A5093059576 @default.
• W4387618064 creator A5093059577 @default.
• W4387618064 creator A5093059578 @default.
• W4387618064 creator A5093059579 @default.
• W4387618064 date "2023-10-13" @default.
• W4387618064 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W4387618064 title "Comparison between Different Bulk-Fill and Incremental Composite Materials Used for Class II Restorations in Primary and Permanent Teeth: In Vitro Assessments" @default.
• W4387618064 cites W1974539886 @default.
• W4387618064 cites W1981313904 @default.
• W4387618064 cites W2002516161 @default.
• W4387618064 cites W2014202838 @default.
• W4387618064 cites W2061849231 @default.
• W4387618064 cites W2082685230 @default.
• W4387618064 cites W2179010078 @default.
• W4387618064 cites W2262824480 @default.
• W4387618064 cites W2402068373 @default.
• W4387618064 cites W2585094733 @default.
• W4387618064 cites W2594221968 @default.
• W4387618064 cites W2606257156 @default.
• W4387618064 cites W2747598858 @default.
• W4387618064 cites W2888625568 @default.
• W4387618064 cites W2889258261 @default.
• W4387618064 cites W2906898795 @default.
• W4387618064 cites W2921353733 @default.
• W4387618064 cites W2942836612 @default.
• W4387618064 cites W2953673341 @default.
• W4387618064 cites W3005025936 @default.
• W4387618064 cites W3043354602 @default.
• W4387618064 cites W3048303083 @default.
• W4387618064 cites W3091991004 @default.
• W4387618064 cites W3110554424 @default.
• W4387618064 cites W3112825810 @default.
• W4387618064 cites W3113530784 @default.
• W4387618064 cites W3130801780 @default.
• W4387618064 cites W3149187029 @default.
• W4387618064 cites W3194583794 @default.
• W4387618064 cites W3215007905 @default.
• W4387618064 cites W4200565235 @default.
• W4387618064 cites W4210810099 @default.
• W4387618064 cites W4220830586 @default.
• W4387618064 cites W4365142100 @default.
• W4387618064 doi "https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16206674" @default.
• W4387618064 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4387618064 type Work @default.
• W4387618064 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4387618064 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4387618064 hasAuthorship W4387618064A5002843464 @default.
• W4387618064 hasAuthorship W4387618064A5093059576 @default.
• W4387618064 hasAuthorship W4387618064A5093059577 @default.
• W4387618064 hasAuthorship W4387618064A5093059578 @default.
• W4387618064 hasAuthorship W4387618064A5093059579 @default.
• W4387618064 hasBestOaLocation W43876180641 @default.
• W4387618064 hasConcept C104779481 @default.
• W4387618064 hasConcept C107365816 @default.
• W4387618064 hasConcept C112950240 @default.
• W4387618064 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W4387618064 hasConcept C165720898 @default.
• W4387618064 hasConcept C178405089 @default.
• W4387618064 hasConcept C180478085 @default.
• W4387618064 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W4387618064 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W4387618064 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W4387618064 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W4387618064 hasConcept C87976508 @default.
• W4387618064 hasConceptScore W4387618064C104779481 @default.
• W4387618064 hasConceptScore W4387618064C107365816 @default.
• W4387618064 hasConceptScore W4387618064C112950240 @default.
• W4387618064 hasConceptScore W4387618064C159985019 @default.
• W4387618064 hasConceptScore W4387618064C165720898 @default.
• W4387618064 hasConceptScore W4387618064C178405089 @default.
• W4387618064 hasConceptScore W4387618064C180478085 @default.
• W4387618064 hasConceptScore W4387618064C192562407 @default.
• W4387618064 hasConceptScore W4387618064C199343813 @default.
• W4387618064 hasConceptScore W4387618064C29694066 @default.
• W4387618064 hasConceptScore W4387618064C71924100 @default.
• W4387618064 hasConceptScore W4387618064C87976508 @default.
• W4387618064 hasIssue "20" @default.
• W4387618064 hasLocation W43876180641 @default.
• W4387618064 hasOpenAccess W4387618064 @default.
• W4387618064 hasPrimaryLocation W43876180641 @default.
• W4387618064 hasRelatedWork W1576741437 @default.
• W4387618064 hasRelatedWork W2104557065 @default.
• W4387618064 hasRelatedWork W2152243197 @default.
• W4387618064 hasRelatedWork W2369146511 @default.
• W4387618064 hasRelatedWork W2481022711 @default.
• W4387618064 hasRelatedWork W2810358961 @default.
• W4387618064 hasRelatedWork W3131825152 @default.
• W4387618064 hasRelatedWork W4221032064 @default.
• W4387618064 hasRelatedWork W4310350770 @default.
• W4387618064 hasRelatedWork W4316686802 @default.
• W4387618064 hasVolume "16" @default.
• W4387618064 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4387618064 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4387618064 workType "article" @default.