FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4387643145> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W4387643145 abstract "The Notre-Dame de Paris fire offers anthropologists in the field of critical heritage studies a rich opportunity for fieldwork and conceptual innovation. This paper examines the social repercussions of a monument's destruction, ranging from emotional responses and public involvement to local and global consequences. The paper also includes the project lines of a broader comparative survey on reactions to the destruction of cultural heritage. A team of social scientists created a comparative grid in order to describe and analyze a series of case studies: Notre-Dame de Paris (France, fire in 2019), the National Museum (Brazil, fire in 2018), Notre-Dame de la Merci (France, fire in 2017), and Coventry Cathedral (UK, bombed in 1940 during WWII). The comparative grid is as follows: - Practices and Reactions: Emotion and Mobilization Regimes Heritage disasters provoke a wide range of privately and collectively expressed reactions that frame these events as a social construction. How do citizens and institutions navigate the outpouring of emotion elicited by the destruction of a monument? - Consequences: The Nature of Heritage Items and Their Social Impact Laypersons and authorities assign different meanings to heritage items according to their cultural and political significance and material and intangible features. How does such representations of a ravaged monument influence its reconstruction process and future relevance? - The Social Fabrication of Memory and Narrative The destruction of a heritage object rapidly triggers a series of narratives, including legal documents and authorities’ statements, that constitute a textual memory of the disaster. What standards define catastrophe narratives, and what do their retellings of the event reveal or obscure? - Heritage in Crisis: Catastrophe as Social Construction of Heritage Fragility Heritage is by nature fragile and requires continuous preservation. How does the destruction of monuments galvanize collective representations of the endangerment of heritage? - Temporality and Spatiality: Catastrophe as an Event in Time and Space Although the destruction event is often short-lived and localized, it reveals enduring values and concepts of past and future, as well as geographic place. How are temporality and spatiality reimagined after the loss of a heritage object? - The Right to Heritage: Reconstruction, Citizenship, and Cultural Policies Although often conceptualized as isolated events, the destruction of heritage objects is deeply embedded in their economic, cultural, and social context. What do the destruction and reconstruction of heritage reveal about power dynamics and economic inequalities? - The Limits of Reflexivity: Researchers as Actors Facing the Politics of Mourning As researchers, balancing personal commitment with heritage and ethical scientific inquiry is crucial to sound analysis and to the validity of research results. How should scholars simultaneously manage the experience of and the study of emotional responses such as rage or grief? This paper illustrates these points using vignettes from selected case studies. The project is part of the working group EMOBI, a broader ethnographic project on collective emotions and mobilization following the Paris cathedral fire (social sciences working group of Chantier Scientifique Notre-Dame, supported by the CNRS and the Ministry of Culture). The goal is to provide a comparative study of the stakes and repercussions of devastated heritage." @default.
• W4387643145 created "2023-10-15" @default.
• W4387643145 creator A5006917330 @default.
• W4387643145 creator A5021864875 @default.
• W4387643145 creator A5025650333 @default.
• W4387643145 creator A5063432910 @default.
• W4387643145 creator A5067445907 @default.
• W4387643145 creator A5076065062 @default.
• W4387643145 creator A5086458293 @default.
• W4387643145 creator A5093064522 @default.
• W4387643145 creator A5093064523 @default.
• W4387643145 creator A5093064524 @default.
• W4387643145 date "2023-10-01" @default.
• W4387643145 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W4387643145 title "Mourning, reconstruction, and the future after heritage catastrophes: A comparative social science perspective agenda" @default.
• W4387643145 cites W2053447420 @default.
• W4387643145 cites W2994829484 @default.
• W4387643145 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2023.09.010" @default.
• W4387643145 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
• W4387643145 type Work @default.
• W4387643145 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W4387643145 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W4387643145 hasAuthorship W4387643145A5006917330 @default.
• W4387643145 hasAuthorship W4387643145A5021864875 @default.
• W4387643145 hasAuthorship W4387643145A5025650333 @default.
• W4387643145 hasAuthorship W4387643145A5063432910 @default.
• W4387643145 hasAuthorship W4387643145A5067445907 @default.
• W4387643145 hasAuthorship W4387643145A5076065062 @default.
• W4387643145 hasAuthorship W4387643145A5086458293 @default.
• W4387643145 hasAuthorship W4387643145A5093064522 @default.
• W4387643145 hasAuthorship W4387643145A5093064523 @default.
• W4387643145 hasAuthorship W4387643145A5093064524 @default.
• W4387643145 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W4387643145 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W4387643145 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W4387643145 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W4387643145 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W4387643145 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W4387643145 hasConcept C199033989 @default.
• W4387643145 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W4387643145 hasConcept C29595303 @default.
• W4387643145 hasConcept C60671577 @default.
• W4387643145 hasConcept C67448173 @default.
• W4387643145 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W4387643145 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W4387643145 hasConceptScore W4387643145C107038049 @default.
• W4387643145 hasConceptScore W4387643145C124952713 @default.
• W4387643145 hasConceptScore W4387643145C142362112 @default.
• W4387643145 hasConceptScore W4387643145C144024400 @default.
• W4387643145 hasConceptScore W4387643145C166957645 @default.
• W4387643145 hasConceptScore W4387643145C17744445 @default.
• W4387643145 hasConceptScore W4387643145C199033989 @default.
• W4387643145 hasConceptScore W4387643145C199539241 @default.
• W4387643145 hasConceptScore W4387643145C29595303 @default.
• W4387643145 hasConceptScore W4387643145C60671577 @default.
• W4387643145 hasConceptScore W4387643145C67448173 @default.
• W4387643145 hasConceptScore W4387643145C94625758 @default.
• W4387643145 hasConceptScore W4387643145C95457728 @default.
• W4387643145 hasLocation W43876431451 @default.
• W4387643145 hasOpenAccess W4387643145 @default.
• W4387643145 hasPrimaryLocation W43876431451 @default.
• W4387643145 hasRelatedWork W1547876688 @default.
• W4387643145 hasRelatedWork W2067294484 @default.
• W4387643145 hasRelatedWork W2348886128 @default.
• W4387643145 hasRelatedWork W2350200549 @default.
• W4387643145 hasRelatedWork W2362132076 @default.
• W4387643145 hasRelatedWork W2367656648 @default.
• W4387643145 hasRelatedWork W2388067091 @default.
• W4387643145 hasRelatedWork W2389168924 @default.
• W4387643145 hasRelatedWork W2965396777 @default.
• W4387643145 hasRelatedWork W2170000670 @default.
• W4387643145 isParatext "false" @default.
• W4387643145 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W4387643145 workType "article" @default.