Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W4387654380> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 63 of
63
with 100 items per page.
- W4387654380 endingPage "102" @default.
- W4387654380 startingPage "97" @default.
- W4387654380 abstract "Background: One of the advantages of resin composites as a restorative material is their repairability. The purpose of the current study was to compare the repair bond strength of conventional and bulk-fill composites with different bonding systems. Methods: In this in vitro study, sixty cylindrical specimens of materials were prepared according to the six groups under study (two types of conventional Gradia Direct and N-Ceram Bulk-Fill Tetric composites and three bonding systems: Single Bond Universal and Clearfil SE Bond and Single Bond 2). The samples were divided into 6 groups of 10 Single Bond/Gradia Direct composite (G1), Single Bond/Tetric N-Ceram bulk-fill composite (G2), Clearfil SE bond/Gradia Direct (G3), Clearfil SE Bond/Tetric N-Ceram bulk-fill composite (G4), single bond universal/Gradia Direct composite (G5), and Single Bond Universal/Tetric N-Ceram bulk-fill composite (G6). Repair bond strength in each group was measured using the Universal Testing Machine (Hounsfield). All data were analyzed by SPSS 21 using ANOVA, Student’s t-test, and chi-square statistical tests (P<0.05). Results: The highest and lowest bond strength (15.81±2.44 and 14.02±1.57, respectively) belonged to the Clearfil SE Bond-Tetric N-Ceram and Single Bond (Etch & Rinse)-Gradia Direct groups, respectively. The ANOVA test results demonstrated no significant difference in the bonding strengths of the study groups (P=0.537). Conclusions: Bulk-fill composite Tetric N-Ceram, apart from the bonding system, had higher repair bond strength compared to the conventional Gradia Direct composite. It seems that self-etch bonding systems (Clearfil SE Bond and Single Bond Universal) have had more bond strength than etch and rinse bonding (Single Bond 2 bonds)." @default.
- W4387654380 created "2023-10-16" @default.
- W4387654380 creator A5003493697 @default.
- W4387654380 creator A5038020373 @default.
- W4387654380 creator A5072668181 @default.
- W4387654380 date "2023-09-30" @default.
- W4387654380 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
- W4387654380 title "Comparison of Repair Bond Strength of Bulk-fill and Conventional Composites With Different Bonding Systems" @default.
- W4387654380 doi "https://doi.org/10.34172/ajdr.1611" @default.
- W4387654380 hasPublicationYear "2023" @default.
- W4387654380 type Work @default.
- W4387654380 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W4387654380 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W4387654380 hasAuthorship W4387654380A5003493697 @default.
- W4387654380 hasAuthorship W4387654380A5038020373 @default.
- W4387654380 hasAuthorship W4387654380A5072668181 @default.
- W4387654380 hasBestOaLocation W43876543801 @default.
- W4387654380 hasConcept C104779481 @default.
- W4387654380 hasConcept C108797602 @default.
- W4387654380 hasConcept C112950240 @default.
- W4387654380 hasConcept C159096172 @default.
- W4387654380 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
- W4387654380 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
- W4387654380 hasConcept C180478085 @default.
- W4387654380 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
- W4387654380 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
- W4387654380 hasConcept C2779227376 @default.
- W4387654380 hasConcept C2781311116 @default.
- W4387654380 hasConcept C3019280483 @default.
- W4387654380 hasConcept C68928338 @default.
- W4387654380 hasConceptScore W4387654380C104779481 @default.
- W4387654380 hasConceptScore W4387654380C108797602 @default.
- W4387654380 hasConceptScore W4387654380C112950240 @default.
- W4387654380 hasConceptScore W4387654380C159096172 @default.
- W4387654380 hasConceptScore W4387654380C159985019 @default.
- W4387654380 hasConceptScore W4387654380C178790620 @default.
- W4387654380 hasConceptScore W4387654380C180478085 @default.
- W4387654380 hasConceptScore W4387654380C185592680 @default.
- W4387654380 hasConceptScore W4387654380C192562407 @default.
- W4387654380 hasConceptScore W4387654380C2779227376 @default.
- W4387654380 hasConceptScore W4387654380C2781311116 @default.
- W4387654380 hasConceptScore W4387654380C3019280483 @default.
- W4387654380 hasConceptScore W4387654380C68928338 @default.
- W4387654380 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W4387654380 hasLocation W43876543801 @default.
- W4387654380 hasOpenAccess W4387654380 @default.
- W4387654380 hasPrimaryLocation W43876543801 @default.
- W4387654380 hasRelatedWork W2084033421 @default.
- W4387654380 hasRelatedWork W2241757929 @default.
- W4387654380 hasRelatedWork W2352133657 @default.
- W4387654380 hasRelatedWork W2599318561 @default.
- W4387654380 hasRelatedWork W2726022663 @default.
- W4387654380 hasRelatedWork W2759555857 @default.
- W4387654380 hasRelatedWork W2795817601 @default.
- W4387654380 hasRelatedWork W3006650515 @default.
- W4387654380 hasRelatedWork W4295539479 @default.
- W4387654380 hasRelatedWork W4386028316 @default.
- W4387654380 hasVolume "15" @default.
- W4387654380 isParatext "false" @default.
- W4387654380 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W4387654380 workType "article" @default.