FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W46406557> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W46406557 startingPage "589" @default.
• W46406557 abstract "I. INTRODUCTION While the enactment of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of 2001 attempts to ensure that all have a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a high-quality education,1 the consequences of the statute may instead deny access to adequate education for a large portion of the population. Its implementation, primarily through its system of rewards and punishments, may actually inhibit educational opportunities for the very population it was designed to serve - lowincome students. If its provisions are enforced, the statute could practically force low-income students to remain in poor-performing public schools while failing to address their real educational needs, thus decreasing the chances of them ever attaining academic proficiency. II. BACKGROUND Tide I funding is the statutory provision that is most associated wim NCLB. In 1965, Congress initiated Title I funding, a provision to assist children of low-income families,2 as part of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA). As part of President Johnson's War on Poverty, Title I assistance could be used directly for educational services for low-income students rather than as block grants that would serve the general needs of the districts or schools.3 Implicit in the statute was the recognition that in poverty performed poorly compared to their wealthier peers, so the federal money went through the school to directly assist those students identified as low-income.4 ESEA placed few restrictions on the use of Title I funding, allowing, but not requiring, schools to use it to implement supplemental services that addressed students' needs, such as medical and dental services, parental counseling services, and meal plans.5 While the statute allowed these services and even encouraged them, studies demonstrated that schools rarely implemented programs only tangentially related to education and that the achievement gap between lowincome and middle-income did not improve.6 Beginning with the Brown v. Board of Education decision in 1954, society addressed education from an equity perspective, asking whether students were receiving an equal education.7 After the San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez decision, the paradigm began to shift to an perspective, whereby the central focus became whether or not every child received an adequate education.8 Understanding the sufficiency of one's education as adequate, however, means only that the education meets some minimal standard and does not breach the issue of an achievement gap.9 During the 1980's and 1990's, the trend toward adequacy continued in the form of standardsbased reform with the passage of NCLB.10 III. NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND Under the No Child Left Behind Act, education continues to be evaluated by viewing the outputs of schools rather than their inputs, an approach that reflects the distinction between adequate and equal.11 In the previous era, as Congress attempted to fund education equally among all populations, legislatures focused on the resources going into schools, the inputs, rather than the results of the funding. In contrast, the approach, with its emphasis on standards-based reform, evaluates student performance, or the outputs. Also contrary to an equity theory, Title I no longer explicitly allocates funds to children of low-income families.12 Now the purpose of the law is to ensure that all have a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a high-quality education.13 Failing to reference explicitly the low-income population belies the policy shift. Indeed, the structure of the statute now provides block grants to Title I schools rather than direct aid to low-income students.14 The funds are dispersed to assist all the students at the school; therefore, the lowincome students get a smaller percentage of the grant to themselves. In fact, some programs may not be directed to low-income students at all. …" @default.
• W46406557 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W46406557 creator A5013829982 @default.
• W46406557 date "2008-10-01" @default.
• W46406557 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W46406557 title "Left Behind: Low-Income Students under the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB)" @default.
• W46406557 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W46406557 type Work @default.
• W46406557 sameAs 46406557 @default.
• W46406557 citedByCount "11" @default.
• W46406557 countsByYear W464065572012 @default.
• W46406557 countsByYear W464065572013 @default.
• W46406557 countsByYear W464065572014 @default.
• W46406557 countsByYear W464065572015 @default.
• W46406557 countsByYear W464065572018 @default.
• W46406557 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W46406557 hasAuthorship W46406557A5013829982 @default.
• W46406557 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W46406557 hasConcept C149923435 @default.
• W46406557 hasConcept C158129432 @default.
• W46406557 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W46406557 hasConcept C17319257 @default.
• W46406557 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W46406557 hasConcept C189326681 @default.
• W46406557 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W46406557 hasConcept C2776007630 @default.
• W46406557 hasConcept C2780491831 @default.
• W46406557 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W46406557 hasConcept C2983172159 @default.
• W46406557 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
• W46406557 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W46406557 hasConceptScore W46406557C144024400 @default.
• W46406557 hasConceptScore W46406557C149923435 @default.
• W46406557 hasConceptScore W46406557C158129432 @default.
• W46406557 hasConceptScore W46406557C162324750 @default.
• W46406557 hasConceptScore W46406557C17319257 @default.
• W46406557 hasConceptScore W46406557C17744445 @default.
• W46406557 hasConceptScore W46406557C189326681 @default.
• W46406557 hasConceptScore W46406557C199539241 @default.
• W46406557 hasConceptScore W46406557C2776007630 @default.
• W46406557 hasConceptScore W46406557C2780491831 @default.
• W46406557 hasConceptScore W46406557C2908647359 @default.
• W46406557 hasConceptScore W46406557C2983172159 @default.
• W46406557 hasConceptScore W46406557C3116431 @default.
• W46406557 hasConceptScore W46406557C50522688 @default.
• W46406557 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W46406557 hasLocation W464065571 @default.
• W46406557 hasOpenAccess W46406557 @default.
• W46406557 hasPrimaryLocation W464065571 @default.
• W46406557 hasRelatedWork W1482789854 @default.
• W46406557 hasRelatedWork W1971391295 @default.
• W46406557 hasRelatedWork W1973362628 @default.
• W46406557 hasRelatedWork W2061165506 @default.
• W46406557 hasRelatedWork W2068386462 @default.
• W46406557 hasRelatedWork W2106647315 @default.
• W46406557 hasRelatedWork W2108391181 @default.
• W46406557 hasRelatedWork W212402975 @default.
• W46406557 hasRelatedWork W2148975150 @default.
• W46406557 hasRelatedWork W2163270542 @default.
• W46406557 hasRelatedWork W222348535 @default.
• W46406557 hasRelatedWork W2574385980 @default.
• W46406557 hasRelatedWork W2768443486 @default.
• W46406557 hasRelatedWork W3125601095 @default.
• W46406557 hasRelatedWork W3125854402 @default.
• W46406557 hasRelatedWork W313128990 @default.
• W46406557 hasRelatedWork W3162139169 @default.
• W46406557 hasRelatedWork W332180697 @default.
• W46406557 hasRelatedWork W2595917495 @default.
• W46406557 hasRelatedWork W2603058337 @default.
• W46406557 hasVolume "37" @default.
• W46406557 isParatext "false" @default.
• W46406557 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W46406557 magId "46406557" @default.
• W46406557 workType "article" @default.