FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W47505830> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W47505830 abstract "This paper will outline the importance of implementing an instructional design model which incorporates a continuous cycle of evaluation, revision and implementation. The context is a case study of a distance learning module which was first presented in 1993 as an introductory module for students taking an Oscail BA programme. As the majority of Oscail students are adults returning to education after a long period of absence from formal education, providing learners with a supportive learning environment which would ease re-entering the educational world has always been one of Oscail’s key goals. Between 1993 and 2002, the Introductory Module was offered in the traditional distance education format and was subject to regular evaluation and revision (Lorenzi, MacKeogh and Fox, 2004; MacKeogh and Lorenzi, 2005). By early 2000, the wider accessibility of technology encouraged Oscail to combine the need to prepare students for university study with the development of e-learning skills. In 2002 the Introductory Module was reconstituted as the SPEL (Student Passport for E-learning) module and was presented for three years. A review of the module in 2006 indicated shortfalls in what is described in the literature as the bolt-on ‘skills approach’ which makes use of ‘a set of atomized skills – removed from subject specific domains’ (Lea & Street, 1998: 158). This prompted a rethink of the overall approach to preparing students for study, and resulted in a decision to adopt an embedded approach to e-skills development. It was hoped that a task-based approach to applying skills to subject specific activities would improve the quality of the learning experience and ultimately result in better retention rates.A review of the implementation of the embedded approach in the first year reveals that while students reported an increase in skills development over the module, and identified a number of positive features, the approach did not succeed in increasing retention. Detailed evaluation including surveys of tutors and students as well as online focus groups have identified a number of factors which militated against the achievement of some of the goals of the module. These included the scheduling of activities, workload, a shorter than usual academic year, insufficient tutor training and student induction, and administrative support.This paper will start with a brief overview of instructional design systems and the models used by Oscail in developing its elearning programmes. We will then outline the way in which through a cycle of implementation, evaluation and revision, the original introductory module evolved into a full year-long module comprising an embedded portfolio of study skills tasks. We will describe the outcomes of the embedded SPEL programme and will outline the evaluation process that has led to further revisions. We will discuss the specific issues that have emerged from the evaluations and will show what measures have been put in place to overcome the difficulties encountered. We will conclude with some observations on the changing roles of stakeholders in the context of new elearning approaches." @default.
• W47505830 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W47505830 creator A5053547331 @default.
• W47505830 creator A5069654099 @default.
• W47505830 date "2007-11-01" @default.
• W47505830 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W47505830 title "Learning from the past and looking at the future. Closing the evaluation- revision-implementation cycle in an elearning module" @default.
• W47505830 cites W1498676379 @default.
• W47505830 cites W1566248696 @default.
• W47505830 cites W1997637295 @default.
• W47505830 cites W2027100742 @default.
• W47505830 cites W2042121885 @default.
• W47505830 cites W2061433932 @default.
• W47505830 cites W2165892344 @default.
• W47505830 cites W24608060 @default.
• W47505830 cites W24715047 @default.
• W47505830 cites W2589555234 @default.
• W47505830 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W47505830 type Work @default.
• W47505830 sameAs 47505830 @default.
• W47505830 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W47505830 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W47505830 hasAuthorship W47505830A5053547331 @default.
• W47505830 hasAuthorship W47505830A5069654099 @default.
• W47505830 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W47505830 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W47505830 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W47505830 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W47505830 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W47505830 hasConcept C177264268 @default.
• W47505830 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W47505830 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W47505830 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W47505830 hasConcept C201995342 @default.
• W47505830 hasConcept C2777432860 @default.
• W47505830 hasConcept C2777855551 @default.
• W47505830 hasConcept C2778775528 @default.
• W47505830 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W47505830 hasConcept C2780451532 @default.
• W47505830 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W47505830 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W47505830 hasConceptScore W47505830C127413603 @default.
• W47505830 hasConceptScore W47505830C136764020 @default.
• W47505830 hasConceptScore W47505830C145420912 @default.
• W47505830 hasConceptScore W47505830C151730666 @default.
• W47505830 hasConceptScore W47505830C15744967 @default.
• W47505830 hasConceptScore W47505830C177264268 @default.
• W47505830 hasConceptScore W47505830C17744445 @default.
• W47505830 hasConceptScore W47505830C199360897 @default.
• W47505830 hasConceptScore W47505830C199539241 @default.
• W47505830 hasConceptScore W47505830C201995342 @default.
• W47505830 hasConceptScore W47505830C2777432860 @default.
• W47505830 hasConceptScore W47505830C2777855551 @default.
• W47505830 hasConceptScore W47505830C2778775528 @default.
• W47505830 hasConceptScore W47505830C2779343474 @default.
• W47505830 hasConceptScore W47505830C2780451532 @default.
• W47505830 hasConceptScore W47505830C41008148 @default.
• W47505830 hasConceptScore W47505830C86803240 @default.
• W47505830 hasLocation W475058301 @default.
• W47505830 hasOpenAccess W47505830 @default.
• W47505830 hasPrimaryLocation W475058301 @default.
• W47505830 hasRelatedWork W1482836825 @default.
• W47505830 hasRelatedWork W1503277297 @default.
• W47505830 hasRelatedWork W1552746307 @default.
• W47505830 hasRelatedWork W1568865296 @default.
• W47505830 hasRelatedWork W1945695261 @default.
• W47505830 hasRelatedWork W1989447154 @default.
• W47505830 hasRelatedWork W2155694429 @default.
• W47505830 hasRelatedWork W2410572080 @default.
• W47505830 hasRelatedWork W2550361794 @default.
• W47505830 hasRelatedWork W2729643173 @default.
• W47505830 hasRelatedWork W2731949855 @default.
• W47505830 hasRelatedWork W2790535632 @default.
• W47505830 hasRelatedWork W2793697307 @default.
• W47505830 hasRelatedWork W2914843770 @default.
• W47505830 hasRelatedWork W3087073649 @default.
• W47505830 hasRelatedWork W3160286327 @default.
• W47505830 hasRelatedWork W325473418 @default.
• W47505830 hasRelatedWork W823999446 @default.
• W47505830 hasRelatedWork W96406059 @default.
• W47505830 hasRelatedWork W3115244825 @default.
• W47505830 isParatext "false" @default.
• W47505830 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W47505830 magId "47505830" @default.
• W47505830 workType "article" @default.