FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W49137312> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W49137312 endingPage "309" @default.
• W49137312 startingPage "309" @default.
• W49137312 abstract "We know little about the motives underlying individual responses to contingent valuation (CV) questions concerning the existence of wildlife. Yet, motives are important because they determine how the resulting value estimates should be interpreted and used in making management decisions. For example, zero bids are very common in CV, but these are often protests that do not represent zero valuation for the resource itself. Protest zero bids may be particularly prevalent in wildlife existence value studies because some people may view trade-offs between money and wildlife as unethical or immoral. If protest zero bids are not interpreted correctly, existence value estimates obviously will be biased. The motives underlying positive CV bids also matter. Unfortunately, these motives have received much less research attention and so may be more controversial. Our study of wildlife values in New England suggests that many respondents who gave positive bids were motivated by ethical concerns, altruism, or the desire to do their fair share-concerns that indicate they used decision-making processes inconsistent with the neoclassical paradigm (Stevens et al. 1991). CV results may therefore fail to measure the economic value of existence in traditional terms. The Bergson-Tintner-Samuelson formulation presented by Kohn (1993) is useful in this context because it attempts to disentangle behavior motivated by ethical concerns about existence from preferences about wildlife use. Each individual is assumed to wear two hats: one as citizen, the other as consumer. From this perspective citizens express social values, which may be ethically driven, while economic values are expressed by consumers. Kohn suggests that we make use of this distinction by first asking respondents, as citizens, to make implicit trade-offs between income and the preservation of wildlife. Respondents are then asked about their willingness to pay for the option of consuming wildlife. While this is an interesting proposal, the Bergson-Tintner-Samuelson framework is only one of several alternative theories about behavior involving ethical considerations. For discussion, these theories can be classified into three groups: (a) theories of social or group interest, (b) natural rights, and (c) theories based upon the neoclassical model of self interest. Social interest theories include the Bergson-Tintner-Samuelson formulation outlined by Kohn and the dual utilities model proposed by Margolis (1982). Margolis suggests that people are motivated by two basic concerns; (a) self-interest and (b) social or group interest. Social interest, which pertains to the welfare of society as a whole, is assumed to be governed in part by ethics, moral duty, and commitment. Expressions of social interest include charity, participation in the political process (voting), and contributions for the provision of public goods. Margolis maintains that the neoclassical theory of self-interest generally fails to adequately explain individual behavior about social interests, and he proposes a dual utilities model of individual preferences in which people have irreducibly distinct social and private preferences. Unlike the framework proposed by Kohn, there is no grand maximum where social value is traded off against private value. Rather individuals are assumed to allocate income between social and private preferences so as to do their fair share for the welfare of society as a whole. Con-" @default.
• W49137312 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W49137312 creator A5028618796 @default.
• W49137312 creator A5035571120 @default.
• W49137312 creator A5072159173 @default.
• W49137312 date "1993-08-01" @default.
• W49137312 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W49137312 title "Measuring the Existence Value of Wildlife: Reply" @default.
• W49137312 cites W1587388520 @default.
• W49137312 cites W1593315985 @default.
• W49137312 cites W1602370074 @default.
• W49137312 cites W2083722668 @default.
• W49137312 cites W2116447466 @default.
• W49137312 cites W2339501771 @default.
• W49137312 cites W272426130 @default.
• W49137312 doi "https://doi.org/10.2307/3146597" @default.
• W49137312 hasPublicationYear "1993" @default.
• W49137312 type Work @default.
• W49137312 sameAs 49137312 @default.
• W49137312 citedByCount "29" @default.
• W49137312 countsByYear W491373122012 @default.
• W49137312 countsByYear W491373122014 @default.
• W49137312 countsByYear W491373122016 @default.
• W49137312 countsByYear W491373122022 @default.
• W49137312 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W49137312 hasAuthorship W49137312A5028618796 @default.
• W49137312 hasAuthorship W49137312A5035571120 @default.
• W49137312 hasAuthorship W49137312A5072159173 @default.
• W49137312 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W49137312 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W49137312 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W49137312 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W49137312 hasConcept C2776291640 @default.
• W49137312 hasConcept C29376679 @default.
• W49137312 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W49137312 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W49137312 hasConcept C95124753 @default.
• W49137312 hasConceptScore W49137312C105795698 @default.
• W49137312 hasConceptScore W49137312C138885662 @default.
• W49137312 hasConceptScore W49137312C18903297 @default.
• W49137312 hasConceptScore W49137312C205649164 @default.
• W49137312 hasConceptScore W49137312C2776291640 @default.
• W49137312 hasConceptScore W49137312C29376679 @default.
• W49137312 hasConceptScore W49137312C33923547 @default.
• W49137312 hasConceptScore W49137312C86803240 @default.
• W49137312 hasConceptScore W49137312C95124753 @default.
• W49137312 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W49137312 hasLocation W491373121 @default.
• W49137312 hasOpenAccess W49137312 @default.
• W49137312 hasPrimaryLocation W491373121 @default.
• W49137312 hasRelatedWork W2131333479 @default.
• W49137312 hasRelatedWork W228806841 @default.
• W49137312 hasRelatedWork W2520363979 @default.
• W49137312 hasRelatedWork W2594342091 @default.
• W49137312 hasRelatedWork W2949766402 @default.
• W49137312 hasRelatedWork W2965233130 @default.
• W49137312 hasRelatedWork W3136134287 @default.
• W49137312 hasRelatedWork W4236312651 @default.
• W49137312 hasRelatedWork W4311627026 @default.
• W49137312 hasRelatedWork W615406113 @default.
• W49137312 hasVolume "69" @default.
• W49137312 isParatext "false" @default.
• W49137312 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W49137312 magId "49137312" @default.
• W49137312 workType "article" @default.