FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W52402775> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W52402775 endingPage "256" @default.
• W52402775 startingPage "253" @default.
• W52402775 abstract "Rationale and Objectives The Socratic method has long been a traditional teaching method in medicine and law. It is currently accepted as the standard of teaching in clinical wards, while the didactic teaching method is widely used during the first 2 years of medical school. There are arguments in support of both styles of teaching. Materials and Methods After attending a radiology conference demonstrating different teaching methods, third-year and fourth-year medical students were invited to participate in an online anonymous survey. Results Of the 74 students who responded, 72% preferred to learn radiology in an active context. They preferred being given adequate time to find abnormalities on images, with feedback afterward from instructors, and they thought the best approach was a volunteer-based system of answering questions using the Socratic method in the small group. They desired to be asked questions in a way that was constructive and not belittling, to realize their knowledge deficits and to have daily pressure to come prepared. The respondents thought that pimping was an effective teaching tool, supporting previous studies. Conclusions When teaching radiology, instructors should use the Socratic method to a greater extent. Combining Socratic teaching with gentle questioning by an instructor through the use of PowerPoint is a preferred method among medical students. This information is useful to improve medical education in the future, especially in radiology education. The Socratic method has long been a traditional teaching method in medicine and law. It is currently accepted as the standard of teaching in clinical wards, while the didactic teaching method is widely used during the first 2 years of medical school. There are arguments in support of both styles of teaching. After attending a radiology conference demonstrating different teaching methods, third-year and fourth-year medical students were invited to participate in an online anonymous survey. Of the 74 students who responded, 72% preferred to learn radiology in an active context. They preferred being given adequate time to find abnormalities on images, with feedback afterward from instructors, and they thought the best approach was a volunteer-based system of answering questions using the Socratic method in the small group. They desired to be asked questions in a way that was constructive and not belittling, to realize their knowledge deficits and to have daily pressure to come prepared. The respondents thought that pimping was an effective teaching tool, supporting previous studies. When teaching radiology, instructors should use the Socratic method to a greater extent. Combining Socratic teaching with gentle questioning by an instructor through the use of PowerPoint is a preferred method among medical students. This information is useful to improve medical education in the future, especially in radiology education." @default.
• W52402775 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W52402775 creator A5006553777 @default.
• W52402775 creator A5016951625 @default.
• W52402775 creator A5017905631 @default.
• W52402775 creator A5053637725 @default.
• W52402775 creator A5055778162 @default.
• W52402775 creator A5065795714 @default.
• W52402775 creator A5070601693 @default.
• W52402775 creator A5080739857 @default.
• W52402775 date "2011-02-01" @default.
• W52402775 modified "2023-10-06" @default.
• W52402775 title "Medical Students’ Preferences in Radiology Education" @default.
• W52402775 cites W2012547719 @default.
• W52402775 cites W2033711252 @default.
• W52402775 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2010.09.005" @default.
• W52402775 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21075021" @default.
• W52402775 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W52402775 type Work @default.
• W52402775 sameAs 52402775 @default.
• W52402775 citedByCount "41" @default.
• W52402775 countsByYear W524027752012 @default.
• W52402775 countsByYear W524027752013 @default.
• W52402775 countsByYear W524027752014 @default.
• W52402775 countsByYear W524027752015 @default.
• W52402775 countsByYear W524027752016 @default.
• W52402775 countsByYear W524027752017 @default.
• W52402775 countsByYear W524027752018 @default.
• W52402775 countsByYear W524027752019 @default.
• W52402775 countsByYear W524027752020 @default.
• W52402775 countsByYear W524027752021 @default.
• W52402775 countsByYear W524027752022 @default.
• W52402775 countsByYear W524027752023 @default.
• W52402775 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W52402775 hasAuthorship W52402775A5006553777 @default.
• W52402775 hasAuthorship W52402775A5016951625 @default.
• W52402775 hasAuthorship W52402775A5017905631 @default.
• W52402775 hasAuthorship W52402775A5053637725 @default.
• W52402775 hasAuthorship W52402775A5055778162 @default.
• W52402775 hasAuthorship W52402775A5065795714 @default.
• W52402775 hasAuthorship W52402775A5070601693 @default.
• W52402775 hasAuthorship W52402775A5080739857 @default.
• W52402775 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W52402775 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W52402775 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W52402775 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W52402775 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W52402775 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W52402775 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W52402775 hasConcept C174594037 @default.
• W52402775 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W52402775 hasConcept C2778701210 @default.
• W52402775 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W52402775 hasConcept C2780553607 @default.
• W52402775 hasConcept C2801541 @default.
• W52402775 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W52402775 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W52402775 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W52402775 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W52402775 hasConcept C88610354 @default.
• W52402775 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W52402775 hasConceptScore W52402775C111472728 @default.
• W52402775 hasConceptScore W52402775C111919701 @default.
• W52402775 hasConceptScore W52402775C126838900 @default.
• W52402775 hasConceptScore W52402775C138885662 @default.
• W52402775 hasConceptScore W52402775C145420912 @default.
• W52402775 hasConceptScore W52402775C151730666 @default.
• W52402775 hasConceptScore W52402775C15744967 @default.
• W52402775 hasConceptScore W52402775C174594037 @default.
• W52402775 hasConceptScore W52402775C199343813 @default.
• W52402775 hasConceptScore W52402775C2778701210 @default.
• W52402775 hasConceptScore W52402775C2779343474 @default.
• W52402775 hasConceptScore W52402775C2780553607 @default.
• W52402775 hasConceptScore W52402775C2801541 @default.
• W52402775 hasConceptScore W52402775C41008148 @default.
• W52402775 hasConceptScore W52402775C509550671 @default.
• W52402775 hasConceptScore W52402775C71924100 @default.
• W52402775 hasConceptScore W52402775C86803240 @default.
• W52402775 hasConceptScore W52402775C88610354 @default.
• W52402775 hasConceptScore W52402775C98045186 @default.
• W52402775 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W52402775 hasLocation W524027751 @default.
• W52402775 hasLocation W524027752 @default.
• W52402775 hasOpenAccess W52402775 @default.
• W52402775 hasPrimaryLocation W524027751 @default.
• W52402775 hasRelatedWork W1790736135 @default.
• W52402775 hasRelatedWork W1973016823 @default.
• W52402775 hasRelatedWork W1976058188 @default.
• W52402775 hasRelatedWork W1993280073 @default.
• W52402775 hasRelatedWork W2116154963 @default.
• W52402775 hasRelatedWork W2121606413 @default.
• W52402775 hasRelatedWork W2349864557 @default.
• W52402775 hasRelatedWork W2566311636 @default.
• W52402775 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W52402775 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W52402775 hasVolume "18" @default.
• W52402775 isParatext "false" @default.
• W52402775 isRetracted "false" @default.

• next