FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W52791337> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W52791337 startingPage "123" @default.
• W52791337 abstract "Introduction [1] AN EFFORT TO BRING INTO A SINGLE FIELD OF VISION TRANSNATIONAL MIGRATION, crime, and popular justice may appear strange. I hope to show, however, that these categorically different activities can, in fact, be related to one another as distinct responses to economic and political fields of reconfigured through Mexico's deepening incorporation into international capitalism. None involves organized resistance or presents viable alternative around which progressive political movements might coalesce. Yet these responses problematize rule -- even as they (temporarily) prop it up -- because they appear in many circumstances to be products of subject identities that reject state's claims to rest its authority on purported social contract. Delinquency involves rejection of law, lynching reflects breakdown in institutionalized justice system, and transnational migration challenges state's sovereign control of territory, especially when economic and political decisions affecting relations in rural Mexican communities made by transmigrants in New York City or California (see Smith, 1999). Social Fields of Power Pierre Bourdieu's idea of social fields provides useful point of departure. For Bourdieu, social fields relatively bounded social domains, composed of endowed with differing amounts of (economic, cultural, and symbolic). The positions' occupants struggle to augment their capital or to change field's rules or boundaries in their favor (Bourdieu, 1990). According to Bourdieu, strategies that actors employ produced by generative schemes or which he calls habitus, representing mental form of structured fields in which actors themselves were shaped. He notes that habitus is a model for production of practices and system of models for perception and appreciation of practices. And in both cases its operations express social position in which it was constructed (Ibid.: 131). By definition, social fields complex and positions multiple, meaning that habitus of social actors occupying those positions vary, even if overall domination of one group gives it more latitude in structuring field to its advantage and thus shaping durable dispositions of field's other occupants. In somewhat different context, William Roseberry (1994: 360-361) referenced this when he defined hegemony as manner in which the words, images, symbols, forms, organizations, institutions, and movements used by subordinate populations to talk about, understand, confront, accommodate themselves to, or resist their domination shaped by process of domination itself. Roseberry opined that, What hegemony constructs...is not shared ideology but common meaningful and material framework for living through, talking about, and acting upon social orders characterized by domination. In his empirical work Bourdieu explores in great detail positions, dispositions, and rules affecting struggles in specific French intellectual, religious, and educational social fields. As Bourdieu is well aware, though, social fields not isolated but intertwined in local, regional, national, and international complexes. Neither they of equal salience in shaping contours of society or globe. To take one example, Bourdieu maintains that writers and artists who dominant in field of cultural production are dominated in their relations with those who hold political and economic power (1990: 145). To analyze fields dynamically and in interaction with one another, we can incorporate Bourdieu's perspective within global vision of Eric Wolf (1982) and Sidney Mintz (1985). Wolf and Mintz treat social fields as multiple, overlapping, mutually affecting, and, at particular historical moments, hierarchically ordered. Their perspective is particularly important now that most local and national economies and cultures have become more open and vulnerable to outside influences because of quick, massive movements of commodities, capital, and, to lesser degree, people (Harvey, 1989). …" @default.
• W52791337 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W52791337 creator A5038687093 @default.
• W52791337 date "1999-09-22" @default.
• W52791337 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W52791337 title "A Failure of Normalization: Transnational Migration, Crime, and Popular Justice in the Contemporary Neoliberal Mexican Social Formation" @default.
• W52791337 cites W159432410 @default.
• W52791337 cites W1597750586 @default.
• W52791337 cites W1972378013 @default.
• W52791337 cites W1980397880 @default.
• W52791337 cites W1990290515 @default.
• W52791337 cites W2021656226 @default.
• W52791337 cites W2021946454 @default.
• W52791337 cites W2048683619 @default.
• W52791337 cites W2164595673 @default.
• W52791337 cites W2332086916 @default.
• W52791337 cites W2480553247 @default.
• W52791337 cites W3035390173 @default.
• W52791337 cites W3108583161 @default.
• W52791337 cites W3194208649 @default.
• W52791337 cites W43787648 @default.
• W52791337 hasPublicationYear "1999" @default.
• W52791337 type Work @default.
• W52791337 sameAs 52791337 @default.
• W52791337 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W52791337 countsByYear W527913372016 @default.
• W52791337 countsByYear W527913372017 @default.
• W52791337 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W52791337 hasAuthorship W52791337A5038687093 @default.
• W52791337 hasConcept C138921699 @default.
• W52791337 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W52791337 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W52791337 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W52791337 hasConcept C2778930550 @default.
• W52791337 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W52791337 hasConcept C411171 @default.
• W52791337 hasConcept C514928085 @default.
• W52791337 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W52791337 hasConceptScore W52791337C138921699 @default.
• W52791337 hasConceptScore W52791337C144024400 @default.
• W52791337 hasConceptScore W52791337C17744445 @default.
• W52791337 hasConceptScore W52791337C199539241 @default.
• W52791337 hasConceptScore W52791337C2778930550 @default.
• W52791337 hasConceptScore W52791337C36289849 @default.
• W52791337 hasConceptScore W52791337C411171 @default.
• W52791337 hasConceptScore W52791337C514928085 @default.
• W52791337 hasConceptScore W52791337C94625758 @default.
• W52791337 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W52791337 hasLocation W527913371 @default.
• W52791337 hasOpenAccess W52791337 @default.
• W52791337 hasPrimaryLocation W527913371 @default.
• W52791337 hasRelatedWork W1590946206 @default.
• W52791337 hasRelatedWork W174757757 @default.
• W52791337 hasRelatedWork W2018905607 @default.
• W52791337 hasRelatedWork W2025809297 @default.
• W52791337 hasRelatedWork W2038942711 @default.
• W52791337 hasRelatedWork W2049356805 @default.
• W52791337 hasRelatedWork W2090435947 @default.
• W52791337 hasRelatedWork W2102651296 @default.
• W52791337 hasRelatedWork W2137194456 @default.
• W52791337 hasRelatedWork W2183711557 @default.
• W52791337 hasRelatedWork W2332394173 @default.
• W52791337 hasRelatedWork W244188810 @default.
• W52791337 hasRelatedWork W2469589306 @default.
• W52791337 hasRelatedWork W2507411384 @default.
• W52791337 hasRelatedWork W2550696300 @default.
• W52791337 hasRelatedWork W2963619871 @default.
• W52791337 hasRelatedWork W3026722026 @default.
• W52791337 hasRelatedWork W3189946644 @default.
• W52791337 hasRelatedWork W3209351373 @default.
• W52791337 hasRelatedWork W594465063 @default.
• W52791337 hasVolume "26" @default.
• W52791337 isParatext "false" @default.
• W52791337 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W52791337 magId "52791337" @default.
• W52791337 workType "article" @default.