FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W54339118> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W54339118 startingPage "327" @default.
• W54339118 abstract "TABLE OF CONTENTS I. FEDERALISM IN MARITIME LAW A Yamaha Motor Corp. v. Calhoun B. American Dredging Co. v. Lambert C. Baris v. Sulpicio Lines, Inc. D. Wagner v. McDermott, Inc. II. COMPARATIVE FAULT A. Exxon Co., U.S.A. v. Sofec, Inc III. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE A. Henderson v. United States B. Underwriters at Interest on Cover Note JHB92M10582079 v. Nautronix, Ltd. C. Acacia Vera Navigation Co. v. Kezia, Ltd. IV. MAINTENANCE, CURE, AND WAGES A. Flores v. Carnival Cruise Lines V. RECOVERY IN NEGLIGENCE FOR PURE ECONOMIC LOSS A. Corpus Christi Oil & Gas Co. v. Zapata Gulf Marine VI. ACTIONS AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT A. Marine Coatings v. United State B. Baldassaro v. United States C. Miller v. United States D. Martin v. Miller VII. CARGO A. Banana Services, Inc. v. M/V Tasman Star B. Plastique Tags, Inc. v. Asia Trans Line, Inc. VIII. MARINE INSURANCE A. Hilton Oil Transport v. Jonas B. Morewitz v. West of England Ship Owners Mutual Protection & Indemnity Ass'n IX. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY A. In re Tom-Mac, Inc. B. Odeco Oil & Gas Co. v. Bonnette X. MARITIME LIENS AND MORTGAGES A. Silver Star Enterprises, Inc. v. Saramacca M/V B. Dietrich V. Key Bank, N.A. C. Bradford Marine, Inc. v. M/V Sea Falcon I. FEDERALISM IN MARITIME LAW A. Yamaha Motor Corp. v. Calhoun(1) This case involved a wrongful death suit arising out of a collision between a jet ski, driven by twelve-year-old Natalie Calhoun, and an anchored vessel in territorial waters.(2) Her parents sued the manufacturer of the jet ski in federal court in Philadelphia, asserting both admiralty and diversity jurisdiction.(3) They sought damages under state law for inter alia loss of society, decedent's lost future earnings, and punitive damages.(4) The district court held federal maritime law controlled the case, not state law.(5) Maritime law permitted recovery for loss of society but not future earnings and punitive damages.(6) Acknowledging that the content of the maritime law was not clear on the matters presented, the district court certified to the Third Circuit the question of whether, pursuant to ... a maritime cause of action, plaintiffs may seek to recover (1) damages for the loss of the society of their deceased minor child, (2) damages for the loss of their child's future earnings, and (3) punitive damages.(7) The Third Circuit did not answer the certified question; instead, it held maritime law had not worked out clear answers to the issues involved and the case should be governed by state law.(8) The Third Circuit remanded the case to Judge Pollak to decide, inter alia, whether the application of the law of Pennsylvania or Puerto Rico was appropriate.(9) A unanimous Supreme Court affirmed.(10) Justice Ginsburg's opinion proceeded as follows: 1) This is indeed a case of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction. `With admiralty jurisdiction,' we have often said, `comes the application of substantive admiralty law.'(11) 2) But [t]he exercise of admiralty jurisdiction `does not result in automatic displacement of state law.'(12) Before Moragne, which created a federal maritime wrongful death action, admiralty courts had regularly applied state wrongful death and survival statutes. The question is, should they still?(13) 3) The question should be narrowed as much as possible. As we recently acknowledged, [i]t would be idle to pretend that the line separating permissible from impermissible state regulation is readily discernible in our admiralty jurisprudence. …" @default.
• W54339118 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W54339118 creator A5034091346 @default.
• W54339118 date "1997-01-01" @default.
• W54339118 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W54339118 title "Recent Developments in Admiralty Law in the United States Supreme Court, the Fifth Circuit, and the Eleventh Circuit" @default.
• W54339118 hasPublicationYear "1997" @default.
• W54339118 type Work @default.
• W54339118 sameAs 54339118 @default.
• W54339118 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W54339118 countsByYear W543391182013 @default.
• W54339118 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W54339118 hasAuthorship W54339118A5034091346 @default.
• W54339118 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W54339118 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W54339118 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W54339118 hasConceptScore W54339118C17744445 @default.
• W54339118 hasConceptScore W54339118C199539241 @default.
• W54339118 hasConceptScore W54339118C2778272461 @default.
• W54339118 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W54339118 hasLocation W543391181 @default.
• W54339118 hasOpenAccess W54339118 @default.
• W54339118 hasPrimaryLocation W543391181 @default.
• W54339118 hasRelatedWork W1181132984 @default.
• W54339118 hasRelatedWork W136516817 @default.
• W54339118 hasRelatedWork W1490657999 @default.
• W54339118 hasRelatedWork W1502908487 @default.
• W54339118 hasRelatedWork W1517009176 @default.
• W54339118 hasRelatedWork W1537488990 @default.
• W54339118 hasRelatedWork W1871128733 @default.
• W54339118 hasRelatedWork W2244666113 @default.
• W54339118 hasRelatedWork W2256193905 @default.
• W54339118 hasRelatedWork W2329028792 @default.
• W54339118 hasRelatedWork W2346849581 @default.
• W54339118 hasRelatedWork W2506662402 @default.
• W54339118 hasRelatedWork W2795915922 @default.
• W54339118 hasRelatedWork W2799461843 @default.
• W54339118 hasRelatedWork W2917714085 @default.
• W54339118 hasRelatedWork W3211859718 @default.
• W54339118 hasRelatedWork W386288454 @default.
• W54339118 hasRelatedWork W8392685 @default.
• W54339118 hasRelatedWork W954506619 @default.
• W54339118 hasRelatedWork W98907107 @default.
• W54339118 hasVolume "19" @default.
• W54339118 isParatext "false" @default.
• W54339118 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W54339118 magId "54339118" @default.
• W54339118 workType "article" @default.