FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W54595123> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W54595123 endingPage "552" @default.
• W54595123 startingPage "544" @default.
• W54595123 abstract "This study compared the effectiveness of five different techniques of intratympanic gentamicin administration for Ménière's disease.A MEDLINE search of the English language literature from 1978 to 2002 was performed using the key words intratympanic, gentamicin, therapy, Ménière's, and disease.Inclusion criteria to select articles for meta-analysis were clear description of gentamicin delivery technique, clearly reported vertigo control results, and report of hearing loss posttreatment. Seven studies (n = 218) describing the multiple daily dosing technique (delivery three times per day for >or=4 d), two studies (n = 84) describing the weekly dosing technique (weekly injections for four total doses), eight studies (n = 253) of the low-dose technique (one to two injections with retreatment for recurrent vertigo), four studies (n =156) of continuous microcatheter delivery, and six studies (n =269) of the titration technique (daily or weekly doses until onset of vestibular symptoms, change in vertigo, or hearing loss) were entered into the model.Vertigo control results were stratified into complete, substantial, or poor control. Hearing results were separated by profound, partial, or no hearing loss. Individuals undergoing caloric testing were separated by degree of vestibular ablation (complete versus partial) and analyzed for vertigo control (n = 301) and hearing loss (n = 333) after treatment.Comparisons between the rates of complete vertigo control, effective vertigo control (complete plus substantial control), overall hearing loss (partial plus profound), and profound hearing loss by delivery method were based on a parametric empirical Bayes analysis using binomial generalized linear models and backward variable selection (joining). Relative risk for vertigo control and hearing loss by partial or complete ablation was examined study by study using residual maximum likelihood to carry out a parametric empirical Bayes analysis.The titration method of gentamicin delivery demonstrated significantly better complete (81.7%, p = 0.001) and effective (96.3%, p < 0.05) vertigo control compared with other methods. The low-dose method of delivery demonstrated significantly worse complete vertigo control (66.7%, p < 0.001) and trends toward worse effective vertigo control (86.8%, p = 0.05) compared with other methods. The weekly method of delivery trends toward less overall hearing loss (13.1%, p = 0.08), and the multiple daily method demonstrated significantly more overall hearing loss (34.7%, p < 0.01) compared with other groups. No significant difference in profound hearing loss was found between groups. Degree of vestibular ablation after gentamicin therapy is not significantly correlated with the resulting vertigo control or hearing loss status." @default.
• W54595123 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W54595123 creator A5004507533 @default.
• W54595123 creator A5039676124 @default.
• W54595123 creator A5075164892 @default.
• W54595123 creator A5084544684 @default.
• W54595123 date "2004-07-01" @default.
• W54595123 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W54595123 title "Intratympanic Gentamicin Therapy for Ménière’s Disease: A Meta-analysis" @default.
• W54595123 cites W1747250944 @default.
• W54595123 cites W1970320181 @default.
• W54595123 cites W1971973958 @default.
• W54595123 cites W1976882309 @default.
• W54595123 cites W1978738732 @default.
• W54595123 cites W2020560564 @default.
• W54595123 cites W2029665560 @default.
• W54595123 cites W2034861025 @default.
• W54595123 cites W2049277188 @default.
• W54595123 cites W2054488023 @default.
• W54595123 cites W2076434961 @default.
• W54595123 cites W2078707551 @default.
• W54595123 cites W2080697674 @default.
• W54595123 cites W2084859291 @default.
• W54595123 cites W2094780740 @default.
• W54595123 cites W2127200200 @default.
• W54595123 cites W2128517077 @default.
• W54595123 cites W2128941263 @default.
• W54595123 cites W2160214975 @default.
• W54595123 cites W2256410958 @default.
• W54595123 cites W4244862594 @default.
• W54595123 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/00129492-200407000-00023" @default.
• W54595123 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15241234" @default.
• W54595123 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W54595123 type Work @default.
• W54595123 sameAs 54595123 @default.
• W54595123 citedByCount "166" @default.
• W54595123 countsByYear W545951232012 @default.
• W54595123 countsByYear W545951232013 @default.
• W54595123 countsByYear W545951232014 @default.
• W54595123 countsByYear W545951232015 @default.
• W54595123 countsByYear W545951232016 @default.
• W54595123 countsByYear W545951232017 @default.
• W54595123 countsByYear W545951232018 @default.
• W54595123 countsByYear W545951232019 @default.
• W54595123 countsByYear W545951232020 @default.
• W54595123 countsByYear W545951232021 @default.
• W54595123 countsByYear W545951232022 @default.
• W54595123 countsByYear W545951232023 @default.
• W54595123 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W54595123 hasAuthorship W54595123A5004507533 @default.
• W54595123 hasAuthorship W54595123A5039676124 @default.
• W54595123 hasAuthorship W54595123A5075164892 @default.
• W54595123 hasAuthorship W54595123A5084544684 @default.
• W54595123 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W54595123 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W54595123 hasConcept C190041318 @default.
• W54595123 hasConcept C2775832221 @default.
• W54595123 hasConcept C2777288759 @default.
• W54595123 hasConcept C2779135839 @default.
• W54595123 hasConcept C2780493683 @default.
• W54595123 hasConcept C2780865074 @default.
• W54595123 hasConcept C501593827 @default.
• W54595123 hasConcept C548259974 @default.
• W54595123 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W54595123 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W54595123 hasConcept C89423630 @default.
• W54595123 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W54595123 hasConceptScore W54595123C126322002 @default.
• W54595123 hasConceptScore W54595123C141071460 @default.
• W54595123 hasConceptScore W54595123C190041318 @default.
• W54595123 hasConceptScore W54595123C2775832221 @default.
• W54595123 hasConceptScore W54595123C2777288759 @default.
• W54595123 hasConceptScore W54595123C2779135839 @default.
• W54595123 hasConceptScore W54595123C2780493683 @default.
• W54595123 hasConceptScore W54595123C2780865074 @default.
• W54595123 hasConceptScore W54595123C501593827 @default.
• W54595123 hasConceptScore W54595123C548259974 @default.
• W54595123 hasConceptScore W54595123C71924100 @default.
• W54595123 hasConceptScore W54595123C86803240 @default.
• W54595123 hasConceptScore W54595123C89423630 @default.
• W54595123 hasConceptScore W54595123C95190672 @default.
• W54595123 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W54595123 hasLocation W545951231 @default.
• W54595123 hasLocation W545951232 @default.
• W54595123 hasOpenAccess W54595123 @default.
• W54595123 hasPrimaryLocation W545951231 @default.
• W54595123 hasRelatedWork W1003468603 @default.
• W54595123 hasRelatedWork W2128478083 @default.
• W54595123 hasRelatedWork W2169643393 @default.
• W54595123 hasRelatedWork W2178178393 @default.
• W54595123 hasRelatedWork W2314323655 @default.
• W54595123 hasRelatedWork W2366092473 @default.
• W54595123 hasRelatedWork W2371019523 @default.
• W54595123 hasRelatedWork W2387841047 @default.
• W54595123 hasRelatedWork W4307328581 @default.
• W54595123 hasRelatedWork W69472872 @default.
• W54595123 hasVolume "25" @default.
• W54595123 isParatext "false" @default.

• next