Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W55877070> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 61 of
61
with 100 items per page.
- W55877070 endingPage "198" @default.
- W55877070 startingPage "189" @default.
- W55877070 abstract "In the calm yet gummy Swedish debate on the prospects and propriety of judicial review of the constitutionality, or more generally, the legality of decisions of political bodies a debate in which Bertil Bengtsson ranks among the more temperate opponents to judicial review, at least at the level of practical action one discerns a broad spectrum of critical views embracing levels of argumentation that span everything from a wing of opposition heavily laden in ideology to a cluster of skeptics whose objections are essentially based on linguistic principles. Each of these factions is opposed by a group of “judicial review” proponents who argue in countervailingly positive terms. At the far end of the ideological wing are those combatants who hold sacred the state governed by the rule of law and the notion of the same, even to the point of considering these to override, in the event of a conflict, the otherwise massively embraced democratic supra-ideology; poised against these “ideologists”, one finds those who reject the very notion that judges or other public officials, by virtue of their education, experience or post, would set straight the public will when manifested in the prescribed manner. Emotionally charged notions embedded in such slogans as “government by lawyers” and “government by the people” are frequent ingredients in the argumentation of the last-mentioned group. Adherents of the other end of the scale, at the ideologically neutral, legally pragmatic or logical-analytical oriented wing, ask, for example, whether legal language is capable of such precision that a comparison between two written norms, manifested in a single decision, is possible within the framework of a technique of argumentation or doctrine of interpretation that is sufficiently “fixed” or “objective” not to force subsequent decision-makers, i.e., appellate judges into making “free” or “subjective” assessments that amount in reality to the exercise of an independent political decision-making function. There can be but little doubt that such an outcome is undesirable, at least within the framework of judicial review. It is common ground among the many different standpoints within and contributions to the Swedish debate that the topic of “review” relates to norms and to the application of norms." @default.
- W55877070 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W55877070 creator A5034136648 @default.
- W55877070 date "2000-01-01" @default.
- W55877070 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
- W55877070 title "Goal-Steering and Judicial Review" @default.
- W55877070 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
- W55877070 type Work @default.
- W55877070 sameAs 55877070 @default.
- W55877070 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W55877070 countsByYear W558770702018 @default.
- W55877070 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W55877070 hasAuthorship W55877070A5034136648 @default.
- W55877070 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W55877070 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W55877070 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W55877070 hasConcept C158071213 @default.
- W55877070 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W55877070 hasConcept C18296254 @default.
- W55877070 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W55877070 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W55877070 hasConcept C2776154427 @default.
- W55877070 hasConcept C2776512386 @default.
- W55877070 hasConcept C2777239683 @default.
- W55877070 hasConcept C2780668109 @default.
- W55877070 hasConcept C42027317 @default.
- W55877070 hasConcept C65059942 @default.
- W55877070 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W55877070 hasConceptScore W55877070C111472728 @default.
- W55877070 hasConceptScore W55877070C138885662 @default.
- W55877070 hasConceptScore W55877070C144024400 @default.
- W55877070 hasConceptScore W55877070C158071213 @default.
- W55877070 hasConceptScore W55877070C17744445 @default.
- W55877070 hasConceptScore W55877070C18296254 @default.
- W55877070 hasConceptScore W55877070C190253527 @default.
- W55877070 hasConceptScore W55877070C199539241 @default.
- W55877070 hasConceptScore W55877070C2776154427 @default.
- W55877070 hasConceptScore W55877070C2776512386 @default.
- W55877070 hasConceptScore W55877070C2777239683 @default.
- W55877070 hasConceptScore W55877070C2780668109 @default.
- W55877070 hasConceptScore W55877070C42027317 @default.
- W55877070 hasConceptScore W55877070C65059942 @default.
- W55877070 hasConceptScore W55877070C94625758 @default.
- W55877070 hasIssue "40" @default.
- W55877070 hasLocation W558770701 @default.
- W55877070 hasOpenAccess W55877070 @default.
- W55877070 hasPrimaryLocation W558770701 @default.
- W55877070 hasRelatedWork W109677913 @default.
- W55877070 hasRelatedWork W136439182 @default.
- W55877070 hasRelatedWork W46394886 @default.
- W55877070 hasRelatedWork W53058155 @default.
- W55877070 hasRelatedWork W60258850 @default.
- W55877070 hasRelatedWork W76129689 @default.
- W55877070 hasRelatedWork W80578354 @default.
- W55877070 hasRelatedWork W92129385 @default.
- W55877070 isParatext "false" @default.
- W55877070 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W55877070 magId "55877070" @default.
- W55877070 workType "article" @default.