FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W571418835> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W571418835 endingPage "111" @default.
• W571418835 startingPage "111" @default.
• W571418835 abstract "In this paper we have described experiments where we have tried to test empirically some assumptions about the relation between the information received by a team (firm) and the policy actually followed. The assumptions are based on a frame of reference related to organization theory. With this aim, we made systematic variations in the information received by the teams, and the behavior of the teams was measured with a number of operational criteria. A simple business game, which to a certain extent had been adapted to our study, was used. Even if the experience of the experiments was on the whole positive from a purely technical point of view, that is, it was not too difficult to collect the desired material without disturbing the game situation, the results of the studies were disappointing: the material collected did not give support to our hypotheses. However, we want to point out that we look upon the study as mainly a methodological study. The material was too limited to allow any statistical analyses and conclusions. The difficulties of distinguishing the expected tendencies may partly depend on problems connected with the empirical research situation. Questions related to the control of the situation and the reliability and validity of the measures used have been dicussed. Partly, however, the negative outcome of the study may be explained by shortcomings in the theoretical frame of reference used, concerning e.g. the assumed relationships between information and decision. Our results can be said to be of general interest in so far as they show the great difficulties of testing partial relations even in a relatively standardized research situation. The experiments hint at the desirability of using a more systems theory-oriented approach. The study also gives some guidance for conclusions about the relative advantages of the business game as a research tool. It seems to be very difficult to design a research situation that is standardized enough to allow for comparisons between teams within the framework of a business game. The advantages of the games as regards their greater realism, as compared to the pure experiments, seem to be of minor importance in comparison with lesser potentials of the games as far as the creation of a standardized research situation is concerned. However, much more research is needed before any definite conclusions can be reached on this question." @default.
• W571418835 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W571418835 creator A5016159752 @default.
• W571418835 creator A5020255431 @default.
• W571418835 creator A5043308358 @default.
• W571418835 date "1970-06-01" @default.
• W571418835 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W571418835 title "The Business Game as a Research Tool: Experiments on the Effects of Received Information on the Decision Process" @default.
• W571418835 cites W1976012063 @default.
• W571418835 cites W1999107183 @default.
• W571418835 cites W2025844353 @default.
• W571418835 cites W2048482399 @default.
• W571418835 cites W2066818595 @default.
• W571418835 cites W2168238837 @default.
• W571418835 cites W2787353595 @default.
• W571418835 cites W2795621218 @default.
• W571418835 cites W85844224 @default.
• W571418835 doi "https://doi.org/10.2307/3439189" @default.
• W571418835 hasPublicationYear "1970" @default.
• W571418835 type Work @default.
• W571418835 sameAs 571418835 @default.
• W571418835 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W571418835 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W571418835 hasAuthorship W571418835A5016159752 @default.
• W571418835 hasAuthorship W571418835A5020255431 @default.
• W571418835 hasAuthorship W571418835A5043308358 @default.
• W571418835 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W571418835 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W571418835 hasConcept C195094911 @default.
• W571418835 hasConcept C2984634286 @default.
• W571418835 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W571418835 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W571418835 hasConceptScore W571418835C111919701 @default.
• W571418835 hasConceptScore W571418835C144133560 @default.
• W571418835 hasConceptScore W571418835C195094911 @default.
• W571418835 hasConceptScore W571418835C2984634286 @default.
• W571418835 hasConceptScore W571418835C41008148 @default.
• W571418835 hasConceptScore W571418835C98045186 @default.
• W571418835 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W571418835 hasLocation W5714188351 @default.
• W571418835 hasOpenAccess W571418835 @default.
• W571418835 hasPrimaryLocation W5714188351 @default.
• W571418835 hasRelatedWork W1549775807 @default.
• W571418835 hasRelatedWork W2094505511 @default.
• W571418835 hasRelatedWork W2370652759 @default.
• W571418835 hasRelatedWork W2379162918 @default.
• W571418835 hasRelatedWork W2993899515 @default.
• W571418835 hasRelatedWork W3124412501 @default.
• W571418835 hasRelatedWork W4214560272 @default.
• W571418835 hasRelatedWork W4281737987 @default.
• W571418835 hasRelatedWork W831794578 @default.
• W571418835 hasRelatedWork W2988265340 @default.
• W571418835 hasVolume "72" @default.
• W571418835 isParatext "false" @default.
• W571418835 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W571418835 magId "571418835" @default.
• W571418835 workType "article" @default.