FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W572912235> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W572912235 abstract "This research aims to review the implementing guidelines of the government of justice within the papal state machinery during the centuries of old regime. In particular it was taken into analysis the long evolutionary parable of the criminal jurisdiction of an ordinary bench for the city of Rome and of a central one for the whole territory of the State: the Criminal Court of Auditor Camerae, autonomous from 1485 from the Apostolic Camera, endowed with large civil and criminal competences on clergy and laity of the Curia. Its vast competences on Chambers connoted it, since the beginning of the 16th century, as the main organ in the provision of civil justice in Rome; both the characteristics of papal power (spiritual and temporal) led the Court to extend – in the field of Commerce and of non-compliance to the papal bulls – its jurisdiction, with the power to impose excommunications and interdicts. The impossibility to divide these skills and the complexity of the procedures in criminal matter have so inclined historiography to overshadow the dynamics in favor of a broader consideration of the civil aspect (indeed corroborated by a wider conservation of the civil fund, compared to the criminal one). Therefore the present research’s purpose is to highlight the procedure in criminalibus of Justice exerted by Auditor Camerae. Specifically, it was developed a cross-study of two chronological plans concerning the development of the Court: on the one hand, it has been made some order in the official law, with reference to a centuries-old route that from 1485 could embrace the entire legal and institutional development until the first half of the eighteenth century. The sources used in this context were found, as well as through the official bullarum, also in various funds kept in the Vatican Secret Archives and in the collections of announcements and edicts issued by the Court; on the other hand, the present research aims to approach an investigation able to weave these normative sources with those ones preserved in the fund of the criminal court (preserved in the State Archives of Rome) in order to deepen the analysis of the institutional structure - in particular that of the judges of officer of the police and notaries - and record the inevitable deviation from what was the effective exercise of justice; in the latter case, the attempt was to focus the investigation on that period, between the sixteenth and seventeenth century, defined as the real apogee of the Court. What emerges, ultimately, from this research is the image of a complex judicial organism that especially in the late sixteenth and early next century - particularly around the years of the reform of Paul V (1612) - was found to play an important role even from the criminal justice’s point of view and not just in roman jurisdiction but in the whole Papal State’s territorial context. Are so defined some institutional aspects of a Court (which has not been specifically examined by the most recent historiographical analysis), which make it possible to trace broader considerations about the entire government of justice in the territories of the Church between the sixteenth and seventeenth century." @default.
• W572912235 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W572912235 creator A5048212726 @default.
• W572912235 date "2010-08-03" @default.
• W572912235 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W572912235 title "Giustizia di antico regime: il Tribunale criminale dell'Auditor Camerae (secc. XVI-XVII)" @default.
• W572912235 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W572912235 type Work @default.
• W572912235 sameAs 572912235 @default.
• W572912235 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W572912235 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W572912235 hasAuthorship W572912235A5048212726 @default.
• W572912235 hasConcept C102587632 @default.
• W572912235 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W572912235 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W572912235 hasConcept C139621336 @default.
• W572912235 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W572912235 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W572912235 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W572912235 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W572912235 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
• W572912235 hasConcept C199521495 @default.
• W572912235 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W572912235 hasConcept C2776261394 @default.
• W572912235 hasConcept C2776949292 @default.
• W572912235 hasConcept C2780252646 @default.
• W572912235 hasConcept C29598333 @default.
• W572912235 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W572912235 hasConcept C48103436 @default.
• W572912235 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W572912235 hasConceptScore W572912235C102587632 @default.
• W572912235 hasConceptScore W572912235C11413529 @default.
• W572912235 hasConceptScore W572912235C121332964 @default.
• W572912235 hasConceptScore W572912235C139621336 @default.
• W572912235 hasConceptScore W572912235C144024400 @default.
• W572912235 hasConceptScore W572912235C162324750 @default.
• W572912235 hasConceptScore W572912235C163258240 @default.
• W572912235 hasConceptScore W572912235C17744445 @default.
• W572912235 hasConceptScore W572912235C187736073 @default.
• W572912235 hasConceptScore W572912235C199521495 @default.
• W572912235 hasConceptScore W572912235C199539241 @default.
• W572912235 hasConceptScore W572912235C2776261394 @default.
• W572912235 hasConceptScore W572912235C2776949292 @default.
• W572912235 hasConceptScore W572912235C2780252646 @default.
• W572912235 hasConceptScore W572912235C29598333 @default.
• W572912235 hasConceptScore W572912235C41008148 @default.
• W572912235 hasConceptScore W572912235C48103436 @default.
• W572912235 hasConceptScore W572912235C62520636 @default.
• W572912235 hasLocation W5729122351 @default.
• W572912235 hasOpenAccess W572912235 @default.
• W572912235 hasPrimaryLocation W5729122351 @default.
• W572912235 isParatext "false" @default.
• W572912235 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W572912235 magId "572912235" @default.
• W572912235 workType "article" @default.