FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W58552502> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W58552502 abstract "AbstractThe research in this article examines the effect on crime rates of public housing transformation in Atlanta and Chicago, focusing on the neighborhoods receiving households relocated with housing vouchers. Modeling the complex relationship between voucher holder locations and crime, using quarterly data, our analysis found that crime rates fell substantially in neighborhoods with public housing demolition, whereas destination neighborhoods experienced a much lesser effect than popular accounts imply. Nevertheless, on average, negative effects emerge for some neighborhoods with modest or high densities of relocated households compared with conditions in areas without relocated households. Overall, we esamate small net decreases citywide in violent crime over study periods during which crime declined significantly. These findings suggest a need for thoughtful relocation strategies that support both assisted residents and receiving communities.IntroductionChicago and Atlanta are very different cities but, in the 1990s, both faced serious problems with their public housing - distressed, high-crime developments that were damaging residents' lives and contributing to neighborhood decline. By the end of the decade, both cities' housing authorities had used federal HOPE VI1 grants to launch ambitious citywide transformation efforts, with the goal of demolishing their worst developments and replacing them with new, mixed-income communities. Transforming public housing meant relocating thousands of households while the new housing was constructed, a process that often took years and required developing new services to support residents through the process. As part of the relocation effort, many former public housing residents in both cities received housing choice (Section 8) vouchers (HCV) and moved to privatemarket housing; most opted to keep their vouchers and stay in their new neighborhoods rather than return to the new mixed-income communities.Not surprisingly, the nation's two largest public housing transformation efforts - the Chicago Housing Authority's (CHA's) Plan for Transformation and the Atlanta Housing Authority's (AHA's) Olympic Legacy Program and Quality of Life Initiative (QLI) - generated a variety of concerns, and many affordable housing advocates focused on how former residents fared during the relocation process (Bennett, Smith, and Wright, 2006; Keating, 2001; NHLP et al., 2002). Local politicians and press accounts in these cities and others have also raised questions about whether households receiving vouchers bring crime and disorder to their new communities (Dumke, 2011; Medina, 201 1).A 2008 Atlantic Monthly article sparked a media controversy by claiming that HOPE VI - specifically, relying on vouchers to relocate residents in private rental housing - was to blame for rising crime in Memphis (Rosin, 2008). The article drew a grim picture of rapidly increasing crime in previously safe Memphis communities and then used an analysis that associated crime incidents with the movement of voucher recipients to make the case that HOPE VI was responsible for these problems. The article ignited a national debate about the effect of housing vouchers on crime, with many researchers and advocates arguing that the Atlantic Monthly's analysis was too simplistic, blaming voucher holders unfairly for broader trends (Briggs and Dreier, 2008). Until recently, however, no systematic efforts have tried to understand whether empirical evidence supports these fears or if they simply represent negative stereotypes of public housing residents.Using a panel data set of administrative records from each housing authority and reported Part I crimes at the census tract level for more than 30 quarters in Chicago and Atlanta, our research examines the relationship between crime and relocation from public housing using advanced modeling techniques. The three questions we explore in this article are (1) the degree to which the entrance into a neighborhood of relocated voucher households has a significant effect on crime; (2) whether any detected effect varies according to thresholds in the concentration of relocated households; and (3) the degree to which the transformation efforts affected overall crime, looking at tracts where public housing was demolished and at destination neighborhoods for relocated households. …" @default.
• W58552502 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W58552502 creator A5005263977 @default.
• W58552502 creator A5017634312 @default.
• W58552502 creator A5032319547 @default.
• W58552502 creator A5038101231 @default.
• W58552502 creator A5062148725 @default.
• W58552502 creator A5065058403 @default.
• W58552502 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W58552502 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W58552502 title "Public Housing Transformation and Crime: Making the Case for Responsible Relocation" @default.
• W58552502 cites W1530648156 @default.
• W58552502 cites W1580060565 @default.
• W58552502 cites W1585084126 @default.
• W58552502 cites W16102660 @default.
• W58552502 cites W1966270738 @default.
• W58552502 cites W1974360420 @default.
• W58552502 cites W1978713268 @default.
• W58552502 cites W1995976975 @default.
• W58552502 cites W2018116478 @default.
• W58552502 cites W2021350449 @default.
• W58552502 cites W2024884122 @default.
• W58552502 cites W2027775821 @default.
• W58552502 cites W2030986783 @default.
• W58552502 cites W2047572512 @default.
• W58552502 cites W2050032543 @default.
• W58552502 cites W2053306248 @default.
• W58552502 cites W2067906066 @default.
• W58552502 cites W2081243696 @default.
• W58552502 cites W2082107925 @default.
• W58552502 cites W2094007400 @default.
• W58552502 cites W2098671745 @default.
• W58552502 cites W2099955648 @default.
• W58552502 cites W2103544827 @default.
• W58552502 cites W2125112084 @default.
• W58552502 cites W2131935379 @default.
• W58552502 cites W2139913187 @default.
• W58552502 cites W2149013005 @default.
• W58552502 cites W2153387745 @default.
• W58552502 cites W2182525287 @default.
• W58552502 cites W2182833627 @default.
• W58552502 cites W2224787899 @default.
• W58552502 cites W2275736610 @default.
• W58552502 cites W2404540915 @default.
• W58552502 cites W2479399230 @default.
• W58552502 cites W2544161659 @default.
• W58552502 cites W3125464082 @default.
• W58552502 cites W560423933 @default.
• W58552502 cites W603263725 @default.
• W58552502 cites W645971168 @default.
• W58552502 doi "https://doi.org/10.1037/e552082012-001" @default.
• W58552502 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W58552502 type Work @default.
• W58552502 sameAs 58552502 @default.
• W58552502 citedByCount "23" @default.
• W58552502 countsByYear W585525022013 @default.
• W58552502 countsByYear W585525022014 @default.
• W58552502 countsByYear W585525022015 @default.
• W58552502 countsByYear W585525022017 @default.
• W58552502 countsByYear W585525022022 @default.
• W58552502 countsByYear W585525022023 @default.
• W58552502 crossrefType "dataset" @default.
• W58552502 hasAuthorship W58552502A5005263977 @default.
• W58552502 hasAuthorship W58552502A5017634312 @default.
• W58552502 hasAuthorship W58552502A5032319547 @default.
• W58552502 hasAuthorship W58552502A5038101231 @default.
• W58552502 hasAuthorship W58552502A5062148725 @default.
• W58552502 hasAuthorship W58552502A5065058403 @default.
• W58552502 hasBestOaLocation W585525022 @default.
• W58552502 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
• W58552502 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W58552502 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W58552502 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W58552502 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W58552502 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W58552502 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W58552502 hasConcept C204241405 @default.
• W58552502 hasConcept C2779019381 @default.
• W58552502 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W58552502 hasConcept C533584247 @default.
• W58552502 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W58552502 hasConcept C73484699 @default.
• W58552502 hasConceptScore W58552502C104317684 @default.
• W58552502 hasConceptScore W58552502C144024400 @default.
• W58552502 hasConceptScore W58552502C144133560 @default.
• W58552502 hasConceptScore W58552502C17744445 @default.
• W58552502 hasConceptScore W58552502C185592680 @default.
• W58552502 hasConceptScore W58552502C199360897 @default.
• W58552502 hasConceptScore W58552502C199539241 @default.
• W58552502 hasConceptScore W58552502C204241405 @default.
• W58552502 hasConceptScore W58552502C2779019381 @default.
• W58552502 hasConceptScore W58552502C41008148 @default.
• W58552502 hasConceptScore W58552502C533584247 @default.
• W58552502 hasConceptScore W58552502C55493867 @default.
• W58552502 hasConceptScore W58552502C73484699 @default.
• W58552502 hasLocation W585525021 @default.
• W58552502 hasLocation W585525022 @default.
• W58552502 hasLocation W585525023 @default.
• W58552502 hasOpenAccess W58552502 @default.
• W58552502 hasPrimaryLocation W585525021 @default.

• next