FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W591301917> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W591301917 abstract "In the last three decades, an increasing number of mining and resources companies around the world have established community funds, trusts and foundations (FTFs) to comply with government legislation or as part of their social or philanthropic programmes. The growth of FTFs follows corporate social responsibility trends within the resources sector to improve the way in which economic benefits are distributed among stakeholders. Benefit sharing mechanisms such as FTFs offer strategic channels by which companies can mobilise resources to mine affected communities. FTFs vary in structure, approach and aims, with the more participatory models relying on community input into the decision making process and the implementation of community development projects (CSRM, 2009). The success or otherwise of FTFs is well documented in academic and industry circles. The degree of success of FTFs varies depending on factors such as company support and community approval. However, as most of the research occurs during the operational phase it does not seem to be appropriate to comment on their long-term success, except where they may already have failed in the short term. This approach does little to expand our understanding of FTF community empowerment and self-reliance in post closure environments. In other words, from the perspectives of community development and mine closure planning there is a case for documenting and evaluating FTFs operating at a time when company funds are no longer accessible and when management of the FTF requires considerable input from the community it was meant to serve. This paper provides baseline results from research undertaken on the Inti Raymi Foundation in Bolivia. It analyses the community engagement practices and the programs used by both the foundation and its parent company, Empresa Inti Raymi S.A. (EMIRSA) to facilitate the process of closure. The success or otherwise of FTFs is well documented in academic and industry circles (Banks, 2003; Yakovleva and Alabaster, 2004; CSRM, 2005; Esteves and Vanclay, 2009; Barclay, 2010). Recent studies by the World Bank, the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) carried out in the area of FTF success found that best practice for mining FTFs include: In response to this limitation, the Centre for Social Responsibility in Mining at the University of Queensland funded research to carry out an in-depth study of a mine site in Bolivia that is at the end of its operating life. The research, funded by an early career grant from the Sustainable Minerals Institute, took place in 2011 over a period of ten months and involved a research fellow and a research assistant who are both proficient in Spanish and have previous professional experience in South America. The research fellow specifically selected this mine site because it fulfilled the main criteria for the study’s methodology: the selected FTF must function when the parent company is either at the end of the operational phase (near mine closure) or the parent company is no longer influential over the FTF (post mine closure). The advantage of this methodology, from the perspectives of community development specialists and mine closure planners, is that the research was able to document and evaluate a foundation operating at a time when company funds were no longer substantial. Also at this particular juncture management of the foundation required considerable input from the community it was meant to serve which highlights the FTF self-sufficiency and the way it interacted with the affected community." @default.
• W591301917 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W591301917 creator A5083603785 @default.
• W591301917 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W591301917 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
• W591301917 title "Foundations, trusts and funds in near mine closure and post-closure environments: a case from Bolivia" @default.
• W591301917 doi "https://doi.org/10.36487/acg_rep/1208_62_pacheco" @default.
• W591301917 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W591301917 type Work @default.
• W591301917 sameAs 591301917 @default.
• W591301917 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W591301917 countsByYear W5913019172017 @default.
• W591301917 countsByYear W5913019172020 @default.
• W591301917 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W591301917 hasAuthorship W591301917A5083603785 @default.
• W591301917 hasBestOaLocation W5913019171 @default.
• W591301917 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W591301917 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W591301917 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W591301917 hasConcept C146834321 @default.
• W591301917 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W591301917 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W591301917 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W591301917 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W591301917 hasConcept C201650216 @default.
• W591301917 hasConcept C20555606 @default.
• W591301917 hasConcept C2777351106 @default.
• W591301917 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W591301917 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W591301917 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W591301917 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W591301917 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W591301917 hasConcept C509133132 @default.
• W591301917 hasConcept C71343576 @default.
• W591301917 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W591301917 hasConceptScore W591301917C111919701 @default.
• W591301917 hasConceptScore W591301917C138885662 @default.
• W591301917 hasConceptScore W591301917C144133560 @default.
• W591301917 hasConceptScore W591301917C146834321 @default.
• W591301917 hasConceptScore W591301917C162324750 @default.
• W591301917 hasConceptScore W591301917C162853370 @default.
• W591301917 hasConceptScore W591301917C17744445 @default.
• W591301917 hasConceptScore W591301917C199539241 @default.
• W591301917 hasConceptScore W591301917C201650216 @default.
• W591301917 hasConceptScore W591301917C20555606 @default.
• W591301917 hasConceptScore W591301917C2777351106 @default.
• W591301917 hasConceptScore W591301917C2778137410 @default.
• W591301917 hasConceptScore W591301917C39549134 @default.
• W591301917 hasConceptScore W591301917C41008148 @default.
• W591301917 hasConceptScore W591301917C41895202 @default.
• W591301917 hasConceptScore W591301917C50522688 @default.
• W591301917 hasConceptScore W591301917C509133132 @default.
• W591301917 hasConceptScore W591301917C71343576 @default.
• W591301917 hasConceptScore W591301917C98045186 @default.
• W591301917 hasLocation W5913019171 @default.
• W591301917 hasOpenAccess W591301917 @default.
• W591301917 hasPrimaryLocation W5913019171 @default.
• W591301917 hasRelatedWork W117737597 @default.
• W591301917 hasRelatedWork W1504975345 @default.
• W591301917 hasRelatedWork W1943739461 @default.
• W591301917 hasRelatedWork W2082666814 @default.
• W591301917 hasRelatedWork W2102325564 @default.
• W591301917 hasRelatedWork W2123488405 @default.
• W591301917 hasRelatedWork W2229686426 @default.
• W591301917 hasRelatedWork W2319711957 @default.
• W591301917 hasRelatedWork W2583108024 @default.
• W591301917 hasRelatedWork W2586346265 @default.
• W591301917 hasRelatedWork W2607184617 @default.
• W591301917 hasRelatedWork W2624573527 @default.
• W591301917 hasRelatedWork W2772474129 @default.
• W591301917 hasRelatedWork W2953435466 @default.
• W591301917 hasRelatedWork W2970772471 @default.
• W591301917 hasRelatedWork W881879933 @default.
• W591301917 hasRelatedWork W212562804 @default.
• W591301917 hasRelatedWork W2550926618 @default.
• W591301917 hasRelatedWork W2937222044 @default.
• W591301917 hasRelatedWork W3123101469 @default.
• W591301917 isParatext "false" @default.
• W591301917 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W591301917 magId "591301917" @default.
• W591301917 workType "article" @default.