FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W5929002> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W5929002 startingPage "175" @default.
• W5929002 abstract "I. INTRODUCTION The tragic events of September 11, 2001, could have been avoided. The intelligence failures that made possible the hijacking of four commercial aircraft by foreign al Qaeda members operating inside the United States were not borne by any single agency or any single individual. Instead, they were part of a systemic intelligence failure-a failure that the 9/11 Commission addressed in the Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (9/11 Commission Report or Report).1 The 9/11 Commission Report recommended there be unity of in the sharing of intelligence.2 Unity of effort is the coordination and cooperation among intelligence agencies working a commonly recognized objective.3 In response to the Report and the events of 9/11, several laws and executive orders were adopted to implement the recommendations.4 One focus of the new legislation was to expand the sharing of intelligence amongst the federal agencies and between federal agencies and state and local agencies. Under the new legislation, sub-federal agencies have the potential to play a larger role in the intelligence community, but that role is entirely dependent on the mechanisms put in place to encourage information sharing and to address risks of information sharing with state and local agencies. The purpose of this Note is to analyze the past and current law governing the dissemination of national security information between federal, state, and local authorities, and to propose reforms. As a consequence of this focus, less emphasis will be placed on general policy questions related to information sharing, even though they are equally pertinent to discussions of the legal basis for information sharing.5 This Note assumes generally that information sharing is necessary for effective intelligence and has abstained from a policy analysis of that position. However, there are serious concerns with information sharing, and Part II gives a brief, non-exhaustive overview of some of those concerns. Part II addresses the policy considerations of including state and local officials in intelligence operations. Part III explores the current cooperative arrangements between federal and subfederal agencies and examines the attributes of each arrangement. Part IV discusses the history of information sharing among various intelligence agencies before 9/11. Part V is concerned with the changes to information sharing post-9/11 and in response to the 9/11 Commission Report. Part VI explores three recommendations: providing greater oversight and incentives for information sharing, establishing a central figure with authority to set standards for all agencies relating to information sharing, and improvements to existing cooperative arrangements. II. POLICY CONSIDERATIONS OF INCLUDING STATE AND LOCAL OFFICIALS IN INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS The destruction caused by the terrorist attacks on 9/11 instilled a sense that America was vulnerable to attacks from within. In the last several decades, homegrown terrorism6 and radicalization7 have increased, leading to a corresponding focus by federal intelligence agencies on counterradicalization.8 With the shift of federal agencies toward counterradicalization and away from the Cold War intelligence bureaucracy, state and local agencies have particular advantages that can increase the overall effectiveness of intelligence operations in combating homegrown terrorism. These advantages cannot be utilized without information sharing between federal agencies and state and local agencies. Professor Samuel J. Rascoff has identified several comparative strengths and weaknesses possessed by local intelligence agents.9 The first strength is called Epistemic Federalism.10 Because agencies approach issues from their particular perspectives, local agencies are more adept at seeing local factors of terrorism than are federal agencies. …" @default.
• W5929002 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W5929002 creator A5070438364 @default.
• W5929002 date "2011-10-01" @default.
• W5929002 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W5929002 title "The Necessity of Federal Intelligence Sharing with Sub-Federal Agencies" @default.
• W5929002 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W5929002 type Work @default.
• W5929002 sameAs 5929002 @default.
• W5929002 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W5929002 countsByYear W59290022012 @default.
• W5929002 countsByYear W59290022016 @default.
• W5929002 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W5929002 hasAuthorship W5929002A5070438364 @default.
• W5929002 hasConcept C108170787 @default.
• W5929002 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W5929002 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W5929002 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W5929002 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W5929002 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W5929002 hasConcept C203133693 @default.
• W5929002 hasConcept C2776034101 @default.
• W5929002 hasConcept C2776854237 @default.
• W5929002 hasConcept C2777006572 @default.
• W5929002 hasConcept C2777351106 @default.
• W5929002 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
• W5929002 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W5929002 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W5929002 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W5929002 hasConcept C48103436 @default.
• W5929002 hasConcept C517823627 @default.
• W5929002 hasConcept C528167355 @default.
• W5929002 hasConceptScore W5929002C108170787 @default.
• W5929002 hasConceptScore W5929002C11413529 @default.
• W5929002 hasConceptScore W5929002C144024400 @default.
• W5929002 hasConceptScore W5929002C144133560 @default.
• W5929002 hasConceptScore W5929002C17744445 @default.
• W5929002 hasConceptScore W5929002C199539241 @default.
• W5929002 hasConceptScore W5929002C203133693 @default.
• W5929002 hasConceptScore W5929002C2776034101 @default.
• W5929002 hasConceptScore W5929002C2776854237 @default.
• W5929002 hasConceptScore W5929002C2777006572 @default.
• W5929002 hasConceptScore W5929002C2777351106 @default.
• W5929002 hasConceptScore W5929002C3116431 @default.
• W5929002 hasConceptScore W5929002C36289849 @default.
• W5929002 hasConceptScore W5929002C39549134 @default.
• W5929002 hasConceptScore W5929002C41008148 @default.
• W5929002 hasConceptScore W5929002C48103436 @default.
• W5929002 hasConceptScore W5929002C517823627 @default.
• W5929002 hasConceptScore W5929002C528167355 @default.
• W5929002 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W5929002 hasLocation W59290021 @default.
• W5929002 hasOpenAccess W5929002 @default.
• W5929002 hasPrimaryLocation W59290021 @default.
• W5929002 hasRelatedWork W103947325 @default.
• W5929002 hasRelatedWork W1512370297 @default.
• W5929002 hasRelatedWork W1534610164 @default.
• W5929002 hasRelatedWork W1571843995 @default.
• W5929002 hasRelatedWork W1597733346 @default.
• W5929002 hasRelatedWork W1768808456 @default.
• W5929002 hasRelatedWork W2017549081 @default.
• W5929002 hasRelatedWork W203410071 @default.
• W5929002 hasRelatedWork W2148277377 @default.
• W5929002 hasRelatedWork W2557344172 @default.
• W5929002 hasRelatedWork W2613896935 @default.
• W5929002 hasRelatedWork W281992357 @default.
• W5929002 hasRelatedWork W2896910447 @default.
• W5929002 hasRelatedWork W2971485179 @default.
• W5929002 hasRelatedWork W297606567 @default.
• W5929002 hasRelatedWork W30537530 @default.
• W5929002 hasRelatedWork W3196890751 @default.
• W5929002 hasRelatedWork W330895538 @default.
• W5929002 hasRelatedWork W2150818587 @default.
• W5929002 hasRelatedWork W223481318 @default.
• W5929002 hasVolume "16" @default.
• W5929002 isParatext "false" @default.
• W5929002 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W5929002 magId "5929002" @default.
• W5929002 workType "article" @default.