FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W597985> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W597985 endingPage "607" @default.
• W597985 startingPage "575" @default.
• W597985 abstract "PHARAOH'S .MAGICIANS: THE ETHICS AND EFFICA:CY OF HUMAN FETAiL TISSUE TRANSPLANTS ROBERT BARRY, O.P. Program for the Study of Religion University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana DARREL KESLER Department of Animal Sciences University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana. IN RECENT YEARS increasing attention ha;s been given to v:rurious types of scientific riese,arch involving the human fetus. In the 1970s, :a tremendous amount of concern was expres1 sed IJ.'egiaroing the fetus ,a;.s a rSU!bject of e~erimenrtation. In this debate, the announced research impeiiat:i:ve was pos,ed against other moral imperativ;es.1 Following much soctiet :JaJl drebarte, protootlive meiaisumeis 1 WeIDe il!dopited 1by oompireihensive regiutatiions in 1975 estaiblishiing protections foT a number of research sUibjects. These regulrutions protect the fetus from non-beneficiail experimentation. that iworuild pose more than minima;l risk rto the fetus. Current debates in science and ethics now swirl arlOiund a new topic regarding human '.fetal life: the fetus as a sourrce of tissue for triansplaintation into other persons ais run e~erimental thempy. It is an issue that is rapidly moving torward the same Jevel of research imperative as did the earlier debate on the 1 See Paul Ramsey, The Ethics of Fetal Research (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1975): Today one often hears statements like' Fetal Research must be done,' or 'It would be immoral not to do this research' (P. xv). The validity of such opinions and utterances entirely depends on a netbenefits ethics, and the validity of that moral universe has been called increasingly into question in recent years. 575 576 ROBERT BARRY, O.P. AND DARREL KESLER ~etus as subject. Recently, ,a new level of intensity was added to this deharte rby the imposition of an indefinite moratorium on federal support for research on transplantrution experiments inv;olving human .fetirul tissue and other !humans. 1Thls :indefinite moratorium w1as a result of a process that 1 began with research p110posaJs considered rby the National In- 'stituites of Health (NIH) in October 1987. In Marich 1988 a momtorium wa;g plaioed on the r:eseareh, and an 1advisory panel was summoned to consider the ethical issues involved. This panel presented 1a cveoommendation for the procedures. However , the Secretary of the Department of Health and Ruman Se1wfoes (HHS), Dr. Louis Sullivan, decided against the research proposal on etmcal grounds. His decision w:as with the 'concU'l'Tenoe of the Assistant Secretary :£m.· Health of HHS, Dr. James Mason, who has Tespons~bility for the NIH. Secretary SulliV1an's decision was oommumcarted to the Acting Director of the NIH, Dr. William Raub, in Nov,ember 1989. A :firestorm of criticism erupted from ,rudv;ocates of this research, including the Council of Judicial and Ethical Affairs of tihe American Medical Association, which 5.n June 1989 called for an end to the:ban.2 In this article, we wish to question both the science and the ethics of the rproposed fotal tissue transplantation therapy. We !Will 1support the £edeml funding moratorium and surggest new pmtections for the fetuses (whether po,ssibly living or de2 Medical Applications of Fetal Tissue Transplantation, JAMA, Vol. 263, No. 4, January 26, 1990, 'PP· 565-570. There has been a .great deal of public debate, not only in the U.S. but also in Europe over whether human embryo research should be supported with public funds. Many Catholic countries in Europe have prohibited such research, while a number of other nations have allowed it. Dickson, D., Europe Split on Embyro Research, Science, Vol. 242, November 21, 1988, pp. 1117-1118. The most interesting controversy is in West Germany where there is a strong movement to prohibit it because many there believe such an experimentation requires judgments that there are certain forms of human life that do not deserve to survive. Ibid., p. 1117. Many Germans regard these sorts of judgments as too close to those made by Nazis, and there is strong sentiment to prohibit such research altogether. Ibid. HUMAN FETAL TISSUE TRANSPLANTS 577 oea:sed) of elective a.bortfons. We will also describe new reseaooh directions in t~apy .for the diseases in which it is claimed that fetal..." @default.
• W597985 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W597985 creator A5013492161 @default.
• W597985 creator A5053802258 @default.
• W597985 date "1990-01-01" @default.
• W597985 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W597985 title "Pharaoh’s Magicians: The Ethics and Efficacy of Human Fetal Tissue Transplants" @default.
• W597985 cites W1595865813 @default.
• W597985 cites W1967396064 @default.
• W597985 cites W1975644691 @default.
• W597985 cites W1976872971 @default.
• W597985 cites W1987655773 @default.
• W597985 cites W1995428355 @default.
• W597985 cites W2009103564 @default.
• W597985 cites W2010260282 @default.
• W597985 cites W2020670618 @default.
• W597985 cites W2024838665 @default.
• W597985 cites W2029141235 @default.
• W597985 cites W2065460504 @default.
• W597985 cites W2075286974 @default.
• W597985 cites W2107828364 @default.
• W597985 cites W2327278364 @default.
• W597985 cites W2332386117 @default.
• W597985 cites W2408842413 @default.
• W597985 cites W2411692061 @default.
• W597985 cites W2418819778 @default.
• W597985 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/tho.1990.0000" @default.
• W597985 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11652585" @default.
• W597985 hasPublicationYear "1990" @default.
• W597985 type Work @default.
• W597985 sameAs 597985 @default.
• W597985 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W597985 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W597985 hasAuthorship W597985A5013492161 @default.
• W597985 hasAuthorship W597985A5053802258 @default.
• W597985 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W597985 hasConcept C172680121 @default.
• W597985 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W597985 hasConcept C2779234561 @default.
• W597985 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W597985 hasConcept C73484699 @default.
• W597985 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W597985 hasConceptScore W597985C144024400 @default.
• W597985 hasConceptScore W597985C172680121 @default.
• W597985 hasConceptScore W597985C17744445 @default.
• W597985 hasConceptScore W597985C2779234561 @default.
• W597985 hasConceptScore W597985C54355233 @default.
• W597985 hasConceptScore W597985C73484699 @default.
• W597985 hasConceptScore W597985C86803240 @default.
• W597985 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W597985 hasLocation W5979851 @default.
• W597985 hasLocation W5979852 @default.
• W597985 hasOpenAccess W597985 @default.
• W597985 hasPrimaryLocation W5979851 @default.
• W597985 hasRelatedWork W1483819104 @default.
• W597985 hasRelatedWork W1532986970 @default.
• W597985 hasRelatedWork W2313704143 @default.
• W597985 hasRelatedWork W2332879386 @default.
• W597985 hasRelatedWork W2487766563 @default.
• W597985 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W597985 hasRelatedWork W4206672088 @default.
• W597985 hasRelatedWork W4230129653 @default.
• W597985 hasRelatedWork W4236897645 @default.
• W597985 hasRelatedWork W4249102988 @default.
• W597985 hasVolume "54" @default.
• W597985 isParatext "false" @default.
• W597985 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W597985 magId "597985" @default.
• W597985 workType "article" @default.