FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W603602322> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W603602322 abstract "This research paper deals with a host of issues concerning national and international aspects qua the children in conflict with law. Emphasising on the philosophical, legislative and realist aspects vis-a-vis juvenile justice (care and protection of children and minors), the author has adopted the following central line of argument, that is, the current scenario concerning juvenile delinquency cries for incorporation of deterrent aspects, fine tuned, into the rehabilitative and reformative theories of juvenile reprimanding. At the heart of the matter is the Nirbhaya Tragedy, which has forced the legislative canons of the Indian Sovereign State, to stop and think, as to in which direction the juvenile justice system of the country is heading towards, for the state of affairs and circumstances (the ‘sprint’ rise in juvenile crimes) seem bleak enough to capacitate the short-circuiting of the entire criminal justice system in India, thus holding it to ransom. Author’s Observation: The Juvenile Justice Bill, 2014, has taken an intriguing position; that is, juveniles in the age category of 16-18 years, committing serious or heinous offences are to be tried as adults with no death penalty or life imprisonment pitted against them. Under the 2000 Act, the position is different; a delinquent juvenile aged 16 years or above, accused of a heinous crime is to be placed by the Juvenile Justice Board in an institution called ‘place of safety’ for a period of 3 years. If we go by the logic of the present Act (the 2000 Act), the juvenile accused (aged 17 years) in the Nirbhaya case, although was most brutal, aggressive, animal-like and maniacal in the commission of rape and murder of the 23-years-old; he (the accused), as per the provisions of the 2000 Act, should be kept in the ‘place of safety’ for a period of 3 years and then should be released with a legal presumption that the accused has been reformed. If, however, the juvenile accused was of 18 years of age, then it was open for the State to have tried him as an adult, levying against him the death penalty. This, with greatest respect is illogical and more-so in the nature of a legal absurdity. The approach of the Proposed Bill (the 2014 Bill) is sound, for it states that the Juvenile Justice Board, for an accused in the age category of 16-18 years, will decide on a case-by-case basis, whether the accused should be treated as a child or as an adult. The Board, aided by a team of experts will decide this based on the assessment of mental state of the accused." @default.
• W603602322 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W603602322 creator A5059125305 @default.
• W603602322 date "2015-01-01" @default.
• W603602322 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W603602322 title "Children in Conflict with Law: Indian and International Perspective" @default.
• W603602322 cites W1528933642 @default.
• W603602322 cites W2321510246 @default.
• W603602322 cites W2331847273 @default.
• W603602322 cites W2482210941 @default.
• W603602322 cites W2484382076 @default.
• W603602322 cites W2505902491 @default.
• W603602322 cites W2602984293 @default.
• W603602322 cites W4230999091 @default.
• W603602322 cites W4233279607 @default.
• W603602322 cites W4238245576 @default.
• W603602322 cites W4238535690 @default.
• W603602322 cites W4250900201 @default.
• W603602322 cites W4253128597 @default.
• W603602322 cites W4256458302 @default.
• W603602322 cites W844741967 @default.
• W603602322 doi "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2620325" @default.
• W603602322 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W603602322 type Work @default.
• W603602322 sameAs 603602322 @default.
• W603602322 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W603602322 countsByYear W6036023222023 @default.
• W603602322 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W603602322 hasAuthorship W603602322A5059125305 @default.
• W603602322 hasConcept C12713177 @default.
• W603602322 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W603602322 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W603602322 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W603602322 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W603602322 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W603602322 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W603602322 hasConcept C55447825 @default.
• W603602322 hasConcept C62100270 @default.
• W603602322 hasConceptScore W603602322C12713177 @default.
• W603602322 hasConceptScore W603602322C144024400 @default.
• W603602322 hasConceptScore W603602322C17744445 @default.
• W603602322 hasConceptScore W603602322C190253527 @default.
• W603602322 hasConceptScore W603602322C199539241 @default.
• W603602322 hasConceptScore W603602322C2524010 @default.
• W603602322 hasConceptScore W603602322C33923547 @default.
• W603602322 hasConceptScore W603602322C55447825 @default.
• W603602322 hasConceptScore W603602322C62100270 @default.
• W603602322 hasLocation W6036023221 @default.
• W603602322 hasOpenAccess W603602322 @default.
• W603602322 hasPrimaryLocation W6036023221 @default.
• W603602322 hasRelatedWork W2169527961 @default.
• W603602322 hasRelatedWork W2367253276 @default.
• W603602322 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W603602322 hasRelatedWork W4210758358 @default.
• W603602322 hasRelatedWork W4221068654 @default.
• W603602322 hasRelatedWork W4235030061 @default.
• W603602322 hasRelatedWork W4238375373 @default.
• W603602322 hasRelatedWork W4241471524 @default.
• W603602322 hasRelatedWork W4251637701 @default.
• W603602322 hasRelatedWork W656864509 @default.
• W603602322 isParatext "false" @default.
• W603602322 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W603602322 magId "603602322" @default.
• W603602322 workType "article" @default.