FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W605579368> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W605579368 abstract "Since the 1970s, research projects and field studies have been conducted on different methods for protecting reinforced concrete bridges from corrosion damage. The methods include alternative reinforcement and slab design, barrier methods, electrochemical methods, and corrosion inhibitors. Each method and its underlying principles are described, performance results of laboratory and/or field trials are reviewed, and systems are evaluated based on the results of the trials. Using performance results from the studies and costs obtained from transportation agencies, an economic analysis is used to estimate the cost of each system over a 75-year economic life using discount rates of 2%, 4% and 6%. Epoxy-coated reinforcing steel is the most common corrosion protection method used in the United States today. Although controversial in many areas, epoxy-coated reinforcement has performed well in many states, including Kansas, since it was introduced in the early 1970s and is a low-cost backup to many of the other corrosion protection options. Research on stainless steel reinforcement indicates that it may remain free of corrosion in chloride contaminated concrete for more than 75 years. At a low discount rate (2%), solid stainless steel reinforcement is a cost-effective option compared to other options, but at higher discount rates, the present value cost of a deck with solid stainless steel is significantly higher than that of an unprotected deck. Stainless steel clad reinforcement is much less expensive than solid stainless steel reinforcement. The performance of stainless steel-clad reinforcement will be similar to that of solid stainless steel bars if the stainless steel coating is continuous and if the black steel core, exposed at the bar ends, is protected so that it does not come into contact with the pore solution. The present value of the cost of a bridge deck built with stainless steel-clad reinforcement is significantly lower than the present value for the cost of any other corrosion protection system. This method should be considered for experimental use. Solid stainless steel should be considered, as well, if a low discount rate (around 2%) is used. Hot rubberized asphalt membranes are the least expensive option, other than stainless steel-clad reinforcement. Hot rubberized asphalt and spray-applied liquid membranes should be considered for use on future projects. In laboratory tests, corrosion inhibitors have been shown to provide protection to steel in chloride contaminated concrete, but information on their performance in the field is limited. Both calcium nitrite and organic corrosion inhibitors have the potential to be cost-effective, if they perform as well in the field as they have in the laboratory, and should be considered for experimental use." @default.
• W605579368 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W605579368 creator A5000731678 @default.
• W605579368 creator A5024954251 @default.
• W605579368 creator A5064526524 @default.
• W605579368 date "2000-05-01" @default.
• W605579368 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W605579368 title "Evaluation of Corrosion Protection Methods for Reinforced Concrete Highway Structures" @default.
• W605579368 cites W1057185615 @default.
• W605579368 cites W125768430 @default.
• W605579368 cites W133841149 @default.
• W605579368 cites W139185948 @default.
• W605579368 cites W1515396060 @default.
• W605579368 cites W1815022060 @default.
• W605579368 cites W2033194987 @default.
• W605579368 cites W2038359845 @default.
• W605579368 cites W2054557816 @default.
• W605579368 cites W2055881399 @default.
• W605579368 cites W2068176165 @default.
• W605579368 cites W2090281664 @default.
• W605579368 cites W2117634740 @default.
• W605579368 cites W2128184494 @default.
• W605579368 cites W220752162 @default.
• W605579368 cites W2240005795 @default.
• W605579368 cites W2245433676 @default.
• W605579368 cites W2250098852 @default.
• W605579368 cites W2292105781 @default.
• W605579368 cites W2329992440 @default.
• W605579368 cites W2580485154 @default.
• W605579368 cites W291809551 @default.
• W605579368 cites W48710104 @default.
• W605579368 cites W53636584 @default.
• W605579368 cites W567982390 @default.
• W605579368 cites W571881373 @default.
• W605579368 cites W583659229 @default.
• W605579368 cites W584633331 @default.
• W605579368 cites W588187029 @default.
• W605579368 cites W594515777 @default.
• W605579368 cites W603492530 @default.
• W605579368 cites W626358554 @default.
• W605579368 cites W647426513 @default.
• W605579368 cites W655890725 @default.
• W605579368 cites W811463735 @default.
• W605579368 cites W2499438922 @default.
• W605579368 cites W3159485726 @default.
• W605579368 hasPublicationYear "2000" @default.
• W605579368 type Work @default.
• W605579368 sameAs 605579368 @default.
• W605579368 citedByCount "23" @default.
• W605579368 countsByYear W6055793682012 @default.
• W605579368 countsByYear W6055793682013 @default.
• W605579368 countsByYear W6055793682014 @default.
• W605579368 countsByYear W6055793682017 @default.
• W605579368 countsByYear W6055793682018 @default.
• W605579368 countsByYear W6055793682019 @default.
• W605579368 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W605579368 hasAuthorship W605579368A5000731678 @default.
• W605579368 hasAuthorship W605579368A5024954251 @default.
• W605579368 hasAuthorship W605579368A5064526524 @default.
• W605579368 hasConcept C113740112 @default.
• W605579368 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W605579368 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W605579368 hasConcept C191897082 @default.
• W605579368 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W605579368 hasConcept C20625102 @default.
• W605579368 hasConcept C2778966251 @default.
• W605579368 hasConcept C2988805333 @default.
• W605579368 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
• W605579368 hasConcept C67203356 @default.
• W605579368 hasConcept C77595967 @default.
• W605579368 hasConceptScore W605579368C113740112 @default.
• W605579368 hasConceptScore W605579368C127413603 @default.
• W605579368 hasConceptScore W605579368C159985019 @default.
• W605579368 hasConceptScore W605579368C191897082 @default.
• W605579368 hasConceptScore W605579368C192562407 @default.
• W605579368 hasConceptScore W605579368C20625102 @default.
• W605579368 hasConceptScore W605579368C2778966251 @default.
• W605579368 hasConceptScore W605579368C2988805333 @default.
• W605579368 hasConceptScore W605579368C66938386 @default.
• W605579368 hasConceptScore W605579368C67203356 @default.
• W605579368 hasConceptScore W605579368C77595967 @default.
• W605579368 hasLocation W6055793681 @default.
• W605579368 hasOpenAccess W605579368 @default.
• W605579368 hasPrimaryLocation W6055793681 @default.
• W605579368 hasRelatedWork W112129486 @default.
• W605579368 hasRelatedWork W1800588788 @default.
• W605579368 hasRelatedWork W183400792 @default.
• W605579368 hasRelatedWork W1934099414 @default.
• W605579368 hasRelatedWork W194701553 @default.
• W605579368 hasRelatedWork W1993043006 @default.
• W605579368 hasRelatedWork W2023407625 @default.
• W605579368 hasRelatedWork W2045561183 @default.
• W605579368 hasRelatedWork W2103598198 @default.
• W605579368 hasRelatedWork W2295681542 @default.
• W605579368 hasRelatedWork W2335898696 @default.
• W605579368 hasRelatedWork W2890218219 @default.
• W605579368 hasRelatedWork W305135343 @default.
• W605579368 hasRelatedWork W3159609755 @default.
• W605579368 hasRelatedWork W45069720 @default.
• W605579368 hasRelatedWork W633633849 @default.

• next