FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W610417557> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W610417557 endingPage "154" @default.
• W610417557 startingPage "149" @default.
• W610417557 abstract "ABSTRACT. objective of this paper is to emphasize the importance of the spatial dimension of societal processes, the challenge of social cohesion, and social segregation in European cities. We shall focus here on the concept of territorial cohesion, the multiple socio-spatial patterns of European cities, and the European discourse on spatial planning and/or territorial governance.JEL Classification: D63, A13, Z13Keywords: social cohesion, spatial justice, societal process1. IntroductionIn this paper we are particularly interested in exploring the geographies of social cohesion, the spatial dimension of social processes, and the social fabric of European cities. Our aim in this article is to develop a research agenda for examining the current focus on the spatial lay-outs of inequalities in European cities, the construction of the socio-spatial order, and the political dimension of social cohesion.2. EU Spatial Planning and Territorial CohesionDabinett and Richardson analyze the Europeanization of strategic planning practices1 in a specific territory, and the consequent implications for spatial justice: the normative construct of polycentric urban development has been underpinned by the fundamental spatial organizing principles of frictionless mobility and balanced regional development.2Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos notes that a spatial turn can be observed in the law that negotiates its turning in ways that move away from spatiality (law 's spatial turn promises to bring forth a space within the law): geography as a discourse can facilitate law's conceptualization of space,3 and space beyond metaphor vies with the traditionally conceived abstraction of the law. Space forces law into dealing with an uncertainty that emerges from the spatial characteristics of simultaneity, disorientation, materiality and exclusionary corporeal emplacement. We should rethink of the novel unpredictability of space that has flowed into law, and reclaim the concept of spatial justice from a socially diffusing, geographically applied concept of regionalism, while making a case for it from within the law. PhilippopoulosMihalopoulos supports a full spatialization of law, a full embracement of law 's emplaced concreteness: space forces the law to turn toward itself4 judge its own judgments, and question its ethics (the law is threatened by the expanses of contingency opened up by space) - space for law is not (just) jurisdiction, ideality or geography. Space can be considered in terms of its material particularity, and in terms of its indifferent universality as a gesture ofuncontained violence, brings an awareness of (other) spaces, both within and beyond the reach of the law, and is a demand for a radical conception of justice, a spatial justice .Empirical evidence produced by previous studies and this one has suggested that spatial justice needs to operate with a concept of space that transcends the regional, insists on the coincidence between occupied space and body trace, has to be thought in terms of embodiment and spatiality, and should be sought between law and space. Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos puts it that the spatial turn is a bringing forth in an ethical reciprocity of hospitality. Law is a concrete abstraction, characterized by its paradox of materiality and immateriality, whereas law's internal conflict between the universal and the particular is forcefully tested in space. law invites space to become part of the legal corpus law 's spatial turn is the process of awareness of law 's always-already spatiality), the law has to act through its limitations and despite its own limits, and in its spatial turn, the law is faced with the task to conceptualize a space proper to the law. The interest in spatiality has increased vertiginously. law has moved in a spatial direction, progressively discovering its situatedness, its terrain. law now constructs itself as a location in a social net of spaces. …" @default.
• W610417557 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W610417557 creator A5019121115 @default.
• W610417557 date "2012-06-01" @default.
• W610417557 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W610417557 title "NORMATIVE CONSTRUCTIONS OF SPATIAL JUSTICE" @default.
• W610417557 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W610417557 type Work @default.
• W610417557 sameAs 610417557 @default.
• W610417557 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W610417557 countsByYear W6104175572012 @default.
• W610417557 countsByYear W6104175572015 @default.
• W610417557 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W610417557 hasAuthorship W610417557A5019121115 @default.
• W610417557 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W610417557 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W610417557 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W610417557 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W610417557 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W610417557 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W610417557 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W610417557 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W610417557 hasConcept C26271046 @default.
• W610417557 hasConcept C2776873942 @default.
• W610417557 hasConcept C39389867 @default.
• W610417557 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W610417557 hasConcept C44725695 @default.
• W610417557 hasConcept C90734943 @default.
• W610417557 hasConcept C91375879 @default.
• W610417557 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W610417557 hasConceptScore W610417557C10138342 @default.
• W610417557 hasConceptScore W610417557C144024400 @default.
• W610417557 hasConceptScore W610417557C154945302 @default.
• W610417557 hasConceptScore W610417557C162324750 @default.
• W610417557 hasConceptScore W610417557C17744445 @default.
• W610417557 hasConceptScore W610417557C190253527 @default.
• W610417557 hasConceptScore W610417557C199539241 @default.
• W610417557 hasConceptScore W610417557C205649164 @default.
• W610417557 hasConceptScore W610417557C26271046 @default.
• W610417557 hasConceptScore W610417557C2776873942 @default.
• W610417557 hasConceptScore W610417557C39389867 @default.
• W610417557 hasConceptScore W610417557C41008148 @default.
• W610417557 hasConceptScore W610417557C44725695 @default.
• W610417557 hasConceptScore W610417557C90734943 @default.
• W610417557 hasConceptScore W610417557C91375879 @default.
• W610417557 hasConceptScore W610417557C94625758 @default.
• W610417557 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W610417557 hasLocation W6104175571 @default.
• W610417557 hasOpenAccess W610417557 @default.
• W610417557 hasPrimaryLocation W6104175571 @default.
• W610417557 hasRelatedWork W1506805269 @default.
• W610417557 hasRelatedWork W1980721999 @default.
• W610417557 hasRelatedWork W1992117879 @default.
• W610417557 hasRelatedWork W2014914227 @default.
• W610417557 hasRelatedWork W2022978496 @default.
• W610417557 hasRelatedWork W2042805949 @default.
• W610417557 hasRelatedWork W2061881163 @default.
• W610417557 hasRelatedWork W2079621616 @default.
• W610417557 hasRelatedWork W2150030305 @default.
• W610417557 hasRelatedWork W2168380348 @default.
• W610417557 hasRelatedWork W2169750008 @default.
• W610417557 hasRelatedWork W2326748651 @default.
• W610417557 hasRelatedWork W2354328932 @default.
• W610417557 hasRelatedWork W2355158079 @default.
• W610417557 hasRelatedWork W2379081895 @default.
• W610417557 hasRelatedWork W2744405446 @default.
• W610417557 hasRelatedWork W2936574052 @default.
• W610417557 hasRelatedWork W3118061076 @default.
• W610417557 hasRelatedWork W2471036777 @default.
• W610417557 hasRelatedWork W3124546821 @default.
• W610417557 hasVolume "7" @default.
• W610417557 isParatext "false" @default.
• W610417557 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W610417557 magId "610417557" @default.
• W610417557 workType "article" @default.