FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W613285586> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W613285586 abstract "The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the different CO2 allocation options that can be used to divide emissions from aviation between sub-national administrative areas. Emissions from aviation, both domestic and international, represent a growing proportion of the UK's CO2 emissions, yet only domestic aviation emissions are included in UK's emission reduction targets and even these emissions are rarely included in the inventories and reduction strategies of sub national administrations. At present there is not a widely accepted method of how emissions from both international and domestic aviation should be fairly attributed between countries and sub- national areas. One reason for this is that airports often serve customers from countries and areas other than their locality. This is compounded by the stance often taken by administrative bodies that emissions from aviation are 'outside' of their control and a matter for 'international' agreement rather than national or sub-national action. While not accepting any level of responsibility for the emissions, the same bodies often provide economic support for airport (and thus aviation) development and expansion as well as aerospace manufacturers with the argument that aviation is integral to the continuing economic development of the area and nation as a whole. One of the principles behind the carbon budgeting approach proposed to deliver atmospheric stabilisation of CO2 equivalence at a level to avoid dangerous climate change is that all sources of greenhouse gas emissions must be included in the budget. Therefore, omitting (growing) aviation emissions from any budget will inevitably lead to budget overspend and thus miss the target for atmospheric stabilisation and the avoidance of dangerous climate change. It is important therefore to ensure that all aviation emissions are allocated between sub-national (and national) administrations for budgeting purposes. The administration is then able to fully appreciate the emission reductions necessary to meet their agreed targets, offsetting growth in aviation emissions with savings from other sectors if necessary. There are a number of methodologies proposed for the allocation of international aviation emissions to countries; this study assesses their suitability for allocating both domestic and international aviation emissions to sub-national areas. The data implications, advantages and disadvantages of each method are provided and practical developments for use at a sub-national scale are suggested. The allocation methods can be used firstly as a baseline to assess the contribution of aviation to the region's carbon footprint, to design cross-sectoral greenhouse gas mitigation strategies and to monitor the success of future methods which seek to mitigate growth in CO2 emissions taken international, national and sub-national levels. For the covering abstract see ITRD E145999" @default.
• W613285586 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W613285586 creator A5004882866 @default.
• W613285586 creator A5010150899 @default.
• W613285586 creator A5033601144 @default.
• W613285586 date "2008-10-06" @default.
• W613285586 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W613285586 title "How can CO2 Emissions from Aviation be allocated to Regional Administrations for Monitoring and Target Setting" @default.
• W613285586 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W613285586 type Work @default.
• W613285586 sameAs 613285586 @default.
• W613285586 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W613285586 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W613285586 hasAuthorship W613285586A5004882866 @default.
• W613285586 hasAuthorship W613285586A5010150899 @default.
• W613285586 hasAuthorship W613285586A5033601144 @default.
• W613285586 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W613285586 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W613285586 hasConcept C146978453 @default.
• W613285586 hasConcept C167740415 @default.
• W613285586 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W613285586 hasConcept C47737302 @default.
• W613285586 hasConcept C74448152 @default.
• W613285586 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W613285586 hasConceptScore W613285586C127413603 @default.
• W613285586 hasConceptScore W613285586C144133560 @default.
• W613285586 hasConceptScore W613285586C146978453 @default.
• W613285586 hasConceptScore W613285586C167740415 @default.
• W613285586 hasConceptScore W613285586C18903297 @default.
• W613285586 hasConceptScore W613285586C47737302 @default.
• W613285586 hasConceptScore W613285586C74448152 @default.
• W613285586 hasConceptScore W613285586C86803240 @default.
• W613285586 hasOpenAccess W613285586 @default.
• W613285586 hasRelatedWork W128429532 @default.
• W613285586 hasRelatedWork W1575609033 @default.
• W613285586 hasRelatedWork W1975692520 @default.
• W613285586 hasRelatedWork W1989477130 @default.
• W613285586 hasRelatedWork W2059813842 @default.
• W613285586 hasRelatedWork W2099367679 @default.
• W613285586 hasRelatedWork W2146337362 @default.
• W613285586 hasRelatedWork W2188423139 @default.
• W613285586 hasRelatedWork W235922278 @default.
• W613285586 hasRelatedWork W2524124723 @default.
• W613285586 hasRelatedWork W2905163968 @default.
• W613285586 hasRelatedWork W2936233526 @default.
• W613285586 hasRelatedWork W2958704305 @default.
• W613285586 hasRelatedWork W3122786863 @default.
• W613285586 hasRelatedWork W3152122976 @default.
• W613285586 hasRelatedWork W3167853685 @default.
• W613285586 hasRelatedWork W3178921839 @default.
• W613285586 hasRelatedWork W570860632 @default.
• W613285586 hasRelatedWork W631490643 @default.
• W613285586 hasRelatedWork W2122593142 @default.
• W613285586 isParatext "false" @default.
• W613285586 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W613285586 magId "613285586" @default.
• W613285586 workType "article" @default.