FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W618988761> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W618988761 endingPage "2856" @default.
• W618988761 startingPage "2855" @default.
• W618988761 abstract "Although colorectal cancer (CRC) remains the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the USA, its incidence and mortality have decreased in men and women since 1997, a reduction attributed, in part, to the increased use of CRC screening modalities [1]. Colonoscopy, regarded by most expert advisory groups as the mainstay of CRC screening, is the only modality that both detects and removes neoplastic polyps from the entire colon. Despite its efficacy, only 20–38 % of the population is adherent to CRC screening guidelines [2, 3]. Colonoscopy at present is estimated to decrease CRC-related mortality by 53 %, with further decrements expected if a greater proportion of individuals received age-appropriate screening [4]. Given limited healthcare resources, information that enables practitioners to focus interventions on populations most likely to be non-adherent to screening colonoscopy is valuable. Multiple patient factors influence adherence to CRC screening [5, 6]. Demographic factors associated with lower rates of screening include female gender, younger age, low income or educational attainment, recent immigrant status, lack of health insurance, and persons of African-American or Hispanic descent [5]. Health factors associated with non-adherence include multiple medical comorbidities and decreased primary care utilization [6]. Nevertheless, little is known about how adherence differs among patients who are undergoing surveillance colonoscopy indicated for a history of colorectal polyps or are undergoing screening colonoscopy. In this issue of Digestive Diseases and Sciences, Greenspan et al. [7] report the results of a prospective study comparing rates of adherence to screening and surveillance colonoscopy in a population of 617 patients seeking care at an urban, tertiary medical center. Of multiple demographic factors studied in patients scheduled to undergo colonoscopy, patients scheduled for screening colonoscopy were significantly less likely to undergo their procedures than those scheduled for surveillance of adenomatous polyps (RR 5.42, CI 2.74–10.75). This intuitive finding represents a new, easily identifiable factor toward which patient adherence efforts can be directed. While univariate analysis indicated that female gender and the presence of medical comorbidities (represented by clopidogrel use and a history of congestive heart failure) were associated with an increased risk of non-adherence, these were not significant according to multivariable logistic regression analysis, consistent with prior studies [8]. The single factor associated with non-adherence and repeated procedure cancellations according to multivariable analysis, was indication for colonoscopy [7]. Although patients with a prior history of adenomatous polyps are at high risk of the development of adenomas or carcinoma (20–50 %) at subsequent surveillance colonoscopy, the risk of adenoma or carcinoma in asymptomatic patients undergoing screening colonoscopy can also be as high as 50 % [9]. Thus, it is appropriate to direct efforts toward ensuring adherence to screening colonoscopy in averagerisk screening populations. The authors also report noteworthy data regarding efforts that may not improve adherence. Prior consultation with a gastroenterologist did not affect colonoscopy & Rajesh N. Keswani rkeswani@nm.org" @default.
• W618988761 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W618988761 creator A5007181969 @default.
• W618988761 creator A5048809276 @default.
• W618988761 date "2015-06-19" @default.
• W618988761 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W618988761 title "Adherence to Screening Colonoscopy: Can We Get Our Recommendations to Stick?" @default.
• W618988761 cites W1540870416 @default.
• W618988761 cites W1861085621 @default.
• W618988761 cites W1969229686 @default.
• W618988761 cites W1975896808 @default.
• W618988761 cites W2004197030 @default.
• W618988761 cites W2024370779 @default.
• W618988761 cites W2025800284 @default.
• W618988761 cites W2036371678 @default.
• W618988761 cites W2082606418 @default.
• W618988761 cites W2089300758 @default.
• W618988761 cites W2116083774 @default.
• W618988761 cites W2140876736 @default.
• W618988761 cites W2152429062 @default.
• W618988761 cites W2159078264 @default.
• W618988761 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-015-3750-5" @default.
• W618988761 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26088369" @default.
• W618988761 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W618988761 type Work @default.
• W618988761 sameAs 618988761 @default.
• W618988761 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W618988761 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W618988761 hasAuthorship W618988761A5007181969 @default.
• W618988761 hasAuthorship W618988761A5048809276 @default.
• W618988761 hasBestOaLocation W6189887611 @default.
• W618988761 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W618988761 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W618988761 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
• W618988761 hasConcept C2778435480 @default.
• W618988761 hasConcept C2909339193 @default.
• W618988761 hasConcept C41260117 @default.
• W618988761 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W618988761 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W618988761 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W618988761 hasConcept C90924648 @default.
• W618988761 hasConceptScore W618988761C121608353 @default.
• W618988761 hasConceptScore W618988761C126322002 @default.
• W618988761 hasConceptScore W618988761C177713679 @default.
• W618988761 hasConceptScore W618988761C2778435480 @default.
• W618988761 hasConceptScore W618988761C2909339193 @default.
• W618988761 hasConceptScore W618988761C41260117 @default.
• W618988761 hasConceptScore W618988761C526805850 @default.
• W618988761 hasConceptScore W618988761C61434518 @default.
• W618988761 hasConceptScore W618988761C71924100 @default.
• W618988761 hasConceptScore W618988761C90924648 @default.
• W618988761 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W618988761 hasLocation W6189887611 @default.
• W618988761 hasLocation W6189887612 @default.
• W618988761 hasOpenAccess W618988761 @default.
• W618988761 hasPrimaryLocation W6189887611 @default.
• W618988761 hasRelatedWork W1978482302 @default.
• W618988761 hasRelatedWork W2007126633 @default.
• W618988761 hasRelatedWork W2025769858 @default.
• W618988761 hasRelatedWork W2031349951 @default.
• W618988761 hasRelatedWork W2070487462 @default.
• W618988761 hasRelatedWork W2070901988 @default.
• W618988761 hasRelatedWork W2150501461 @default.
• W618988761 hasRelatedWork W2547759822 @default.
• W618988761 hasRelatedWork W343795539 @default.
• W618988761 hasRelatedWork W1990539888 @default.
• W618988761 hasVolume "60" @default.
• W618988761 isParatext "false" @default.
• W618988761 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W618988761 magId "618988761" @default.
• W618988761 workType "article" @default.