FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W62116359> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W62116359 startingPage "1187" @default.
• W62116359 abstract "I. INTRODUCTION This article seeks to empirically examine the voting patterns of two judges, Judge Barrington D. Parker, Jr. and Judge Robert D. Sack of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. These judges were selected for inclusion in this issue of New York Appeals because their opinions evidenced a clear pattern of protecting a defendant or petitioner against the power of the state. Examining judicial decision-making helps to illuminate the priorities of judges that underlie their decisions. Particularly with regard to appeals, there is often a disagreement about the outcome and there are frequently strong arguments and case law in support of both positions. The way a judge votes can thus be analyzed over time to reveal patterns. First, this article will examine the background of the judges. (1) Second, the dissenting opinions authored by the judges over the past five years will be examined in detail. (2) Next, this article will examine the voting patterns in the majority opinions the judges authored. (3) Finally, this paper will conclude with a discussion of the themes and patterns which have emerged from the study. (4) II. BIOGRAPHIES A. Judge Parker Judge Parker was born and raised in Washington, D.C. (5) His father, Barrington D. Parker, Sr., was a federal district court judge for the District of Columbia from 1969 to 1993. (6) Judge Parker attended Yale for both undergraduate and law school. (7) He received his Bachelor of Arts degree in 1965 and his Bachelor of Laws (8) (LL.B.) in 1969. (9) After law school, Judge Parker began his legal career clerking for Judge Aubrey E. Robinson, Jr. of the District Court for the District of Columbia. (10) Following his clerkship, Judge Parker worked in private practice for approximately twenty-three years in New York City with Sullivan & Cromwell, Parker Auspitz Neesemann & Delehanty, P.C., and Morrison & Foerster. (11) Judge Parker's practice focused on general commercial litigation. (12) In 1994, President Clinton appointed Judge Parker to the District Court for the Southern District of New York. (13) He there until 2001 when President Bush elevated Judge Parker to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. (14) Judge Parker took senior status in 2009. (15) B. Judge Sack Judge Sack's legal career followed much the same path as Judge Parker's. He graduated from the University of Rochester in 1960 and Columbia Law School in 1963. (16) Following law school, Judge Sack clerked for Judge Arthur S. Lane at the District Court for the District of New Jersey. (17) Judge Sack spent approximately thirty-three years in private practice in New York City as an associate and partner with Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler and a partner with Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher. (18) Judge Sack's practice focused on national and international press law. (19) Judge Sack also served as a Senior Associate Special Counsel to the United States House of Representatives Impeachment Inquiry Staff' in 1974. (20) Judge Sack has authored and co-authored a number of texts on press law including Sack on Defamation: Libel, Slander, and Related Problems, (21) Advertising and Commercial Speech: A First Amendment Guide, (22) and Protection of Opinion Under the First Amendment: Reflections on Alfred Hill: Defamation and Privacy Under the First Amendment. (23) Judge Sack was appointed to the Second Circuit by President Clinton in 1998. (24) He was awarded the Federal Bar Council's Learned Hand Medal for excellence in federal jurisprudence on May 1, 2008. (25) He took senior status on August 6, 2009. (26) III. DECISIONS A central focus of this paper is Judge Parker's and Judge Sack's dissents. A dissent is a very illuminating piece of writing in that it is a public proclamation that the judge disagrees with the majority of the courts On the Second Circuit, unless it is an en banc dissent, a written dissent is a lone opinion which shows that the judge disagreed with the other members of the panel. …" @default.
• W62116359 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W62116359 creator A5059639143 @default.
• W62116359 date "2011-12-22" @default.
• W62116359 modified "2023-09-28" @default.
• W62116359 title "Decision-Making at the Second Circuit: Judges Barrington D. Parker, Jr. and Robert D. Sack" @default.
• W62116359 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W62116359 type Work @default.
• W62116359 sameAs 62116359 @default.
• W62116359 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W62116359 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W62116359 hasAuthorship W62116359A5059639143 @default.
• W62116359 hasConcept C11413529 @default.
• W62116359 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W62116359 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W62116359 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W62116359 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W62116359 hasConcept C179576951 @default.
• W62116359 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W62116359 hasConcept C2777626052 @default.
• W62116359 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W62116359 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W62116359 hasConcept C48103436 @default.
• W62116359 hasConcept C520049643 @default.
• W62116359 hasConcept C56617239 @default.
• W62116359 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W62116359 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W62116359 hasConceptScore W62116359C11413529 @default.
• W62116359 hasConceptScore W62116359C121332964 @default.
• W62116359 hasConceptScore W62116359C144024400 @default.
• W62116359 hasConceptScore W62116359C163258240 @default.
• W62116359 hasConceptScore W62116359C17744445 @default.
• W62116359 hasConceptScore W62116359C179576951 @default.
• W62116359 hasConceptScore W62116359C199539241 @default.
• W62116359 hasConceptScore W62116359C2777626052 @default.
• W62116359 hasConceptScore W62116359C2778272461 @default.
• W62116359 hasConceptScore W62116359C41008148 @default.
• W62116359 hasConceptScore W62116359C48103436 @default.
• W62116359 hasConceptScore W62116359C520049643 @default.
• W62116359 hasConceptScore W62116359C56617239 @default.
• W62116359 hasConceptScore W62116359C62520636 @default.
• W62116359 hasConceptScore W62116359C94625758 @default.
• W62116359 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W62116359 hasLocation W621163591 @default.
• W62116359 hasOpenAccess W62116359 @default.
• W62116359 hasPrimaryLocation W621163591 @default.
• W62116359 hasRelatedWork W1595814344 @default.
• W62116359 hasRelatedWork W1859398581 @default.
• W62116359 hasRelatedWork W1971208606 @default.
• W62116359 hasRelatedWork W2012714662 @default.
• W62116359 hasRelatedWork W2018501137 @default.
• W62116359 hasRelatedWork W2062203107 @default.
• W62116359 hasRelatedWork W2147495843 @default.
• W62116359 hasRelatedWork W2187303742 @default.
• W62116359 hasRelatedWork W2278885259 @default.
• W62116359 hasRelatedWork W2289116000 @default.
• W62116359 hasRelatedWork W2604227853 @default.
• W62116359 hasRelatedWork W2753685185 @default.
• W62116359 hasRelatedWork W2765842080 @default.
• W62116359 hasRelatedWork W3123784327 @default.
• W62116359 hasRelatedWork W3124413411 @default.
• W62116359 hasRelatedWork W589683195 @default.
• W62116359 hasRelatedWork W813407417 @default.
• W62116359 hasRelatedWork W2188059950 @default.
• W62116359 hasRelatedWork W2303694638 @default.
• W62116359 hasRelatedWork W86695229 @default.
• W62116359 hasVolume "75" @default.
• W62116359 isParatext "false" @default.
• W62116359 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W62116359 magId "62116359" @default.
• W62116359 workType "article" @default.