Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W62397582> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 73 of
73
with 100 items per page.
- W62397582 abstract "This article describes and analyzes three aspects of the appropriations process of the judiciary: the procedures used to formulate the budget, the results of the appropriations process, and the factors that influence appropriations decisions. Statistics support the hypothesis that the lower courts' appropriations lag behind their caseload. A consideration of the appropriations process explains both why such a lag occurs and why the lag is three years in length. The judiciary's appropriations process has achieved several important goals, such as improving the financial condition of the Third Branch. But other important goals, such as giving judges control of the appropriations process, have not been achieved. tion of the appropriations process. To be sure, Congress still decides how much money to allocate for the judiciary. But the judiciary can influence that decision, primarily because officials in the Third Branch prepare the judiciary's appropriations estimates (28 U.S.C. ? 605 (1982)) and present them to Congress. This article offers a description and analysis of the appropriations pro cess of the judiciary1 in order to answer several questions: How is the judiciary's budget formulated? How much money has Congress ap propriated for the judiciary? What factors affect appropriations decisions? The answers to these questions deserve attention not only because the courts' funding has important implications for their ability to perform their constitutional role, but also because the appropriations process has important implications for some of the broader issues of judicial adminis tration. For example, the appropriations process has important implica *The author is indebted to Dr. Peter G. Fish for his comments on previous drafts of this article, and to Gary Myers for his assistance in computing the statistics in this article. **J.D. graduate, Duke University School of Law. 1. The term federal judiciary, as used in this article, includes the U.S. Supreme Court (which prepares its own appropriations estimates), the Courts of Appeals, the District Courts, the special courts (such as the Court of Claims), the Bankruptcy Courts, the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, and the Federal Judicial Center. THE JUSTICE SYSTEM JOURNAL, Volume 10, Number 1 (1985)" @default.
- W62397582 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W62397582 creator A5042053527 @default.
- W62397582 date "2016-01-01" @default.
- W62397582 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W62397582 title "OF DOLLARS AND JUSTICE: THE APPROPRIATIONS PROCESS OF THE FEDERAL JUDICIARY*" @default.
- W62397582 cites W1492541238 @default.
- W62397582 cites W1531225843 @default.
- W62397582 cites W2020756849 @default.
- W62397582 cites W2025668228 @default.
- W62397582 cites W2315097564 @default.
- W62397582 cites W2441899732 @default.
- W62397582 hasPublicationYear "2016" @default.
- W62397582 type Work @default.
- W62397582 sameAs 62397582 @default.
- W62397582 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W62397582 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W62397582 hasAuthorship W62397582A5042053527 @default.
- W62397582 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
- W62397582 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
- W62397582 hasConcept C139621336 @default.
- W62397582 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W62397582 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
- W62397582 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W62397582 hasConcept C182306322 @default.
- W62397582 hasConcept C187736073 @default.
- W62397582 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W62397582 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W62397582 hasConcept C2775924081 @default.
- W62397582 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
- W62397582 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W62397582 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
- W62397582 hasConceptScore W62397582C10138342 @default.
- W62397582 hasConceptScore W62397582C111919701 @default.
- W62397582 hasConceptScore W62397582C139621336 @default.
- W62397582 hasConceptScore W62397582C144133560 @default.
- W62397582 hasConceptScore W62397582C162324750 @default.
- W62397582 hasConceptScore W62397582C17744445 @default.
- W62397582 hasConceptScore W62397582C182306322 @default.
- W62397582 hasConceptScore W62397582C187736073 @default.
- W62397582 hasConceptScore W62397582C190253527 @default.
- W62397582 hasConceptScore W62397582C199539241 @default.
- W62397582 hasConceptScore W62397582C2775924081 @default.
- W62397582 hasConceptScore W62397582C3116431 @default.
- W62397582 hasConceptScore W62397582C41008148 @default.
- W62397582 hasConceptScore W62397582C98045186 @default.
- W62397582 hasLocation W623975821 @default.
- W62397582 hasOpenAccess W62397582 @default.
- W62397582 hasPrimaryLocation W623975821 @default.
- W62397582 hasRelatedWork W142547722 @default.
- W62397582 hasRelatedWork W1570016355 @default.
- W62397582 hasRelatedWork W1604672683 @default.
- W62397582 hasRelatedWork W1979466314 @default.
- W62397582 hasRelatedWork W1997178269 @default.
- W62397582 hasRelatedWork W2000466274 @default.
- W62397582 hasRelatedWork W2039796524 @default.
- W62397582 hasRelatedWork W2072078695 @default.
- W62397582 hasRelatedWork W2081244018 @default.
- W62397582 hasRelatedWork W2108260454 @default.
- W62397582 hasRelatedWork W2155218320 @default.
- W62397582 hasRelatedWork W2201031065 @default.
- W62397582 hasRelatedWork W2212003183 @default.
- W62397582 hasRelatedWork W2312713701 @default.
- W62397582 hasRelatedWork W2315147321 @default.
- W62397582 hasRelatedWork W2415854578 @default.
- W62397582 hasRelatedWork W3123918519 @default.
- W62397582 hasRelatedWork W3124069391 @default.
- W62397582 hasRelatedWork W384766066 @default.
- W62397582 hasRelatedWork W3126387892 @default.
- W62397582 isParatext "false" @default.
- W62397582 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W62397582 magId "62397582" @default.
- W62397582 workType "article" @default.