FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W6286123> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W6286123 startingPage "40" @default.
• W6286123 abstract "Using a sample of 200 medical technologists over a 4-year period, this study investigated whether peer, supervisor, and patient communication satisfaction facets were related but distinct referents. Confirmatory factor analyses on medical technologist sample and a second independent sample of 85 medical/health professionals supported distinctiveness of these three referents. Correlational differences between communication satisfaction referents were found. Specifically, professional withdrawal intent, gathered twice before communication satisfaction, had stronger negative relationships to patient versus peer communication satisfaction. Job satisfaction and organizational withdrawal intent also exhibited correlational differences to communication satisfaction referents. One unexpected finding across both samples was that there was higher communication satisfaction with patients of opposite versus same sex. J Allied Health 2005; 34:40-46. COMMUNICATION SATISFACTION has been generally defined as an individual's satisfaction with various aspects of communication in his or her organization.1 Empirical research has indicated that communication satisfaction can he multidimensional.1,2 Prior research has found communication satisfaction to he positively related to outcomes such as joh satisfaction, organizational commitment, and joh performance and negatively related to intent to leave one's organization.3-7 However, research de_sign used in these studies was cross-sectional, leaving open interpretation of reverse causation,8 that is, that communication satisfaction could also be'viewed as outcome variable. This study used a longitudinal research design to investigate correlates of three different facets of communication satisfaction (supervisor, peer, and patient) using a unique sample (medical technologists [MTs]). The goal of this study was to Jemonsttate that peet, supervisor, and patient communication satisfaction are distinct facets of communication satisfaction. Correlates of these facets tested included job satisfaction, professional withdrawal intent, organizational withdrawal intent, and perceived gender discrimination. Communication satisfaction has been operationalized in many different ways, including as a multidimensional construct. Probably most popular multidimensional measure of communication satisfaction is based on work of Downs and Hazen.2 They originally found eight factors within their scale: general organizational perspective, personal feedback, organizational integration, supervisory communication, communication climate, horizontal communication, media quality, and subordinate communication. However, subsequent research using this scale questioned this eight-factor structure,1 and one study4 indicated more support for a simpler three-factor solution, that is, general organizational, dyadic (involving others such as supervisor, peer, and subordinate), and feedback. Another multidimensional measure of communication measured different perceived qualities of communication (e.g., trust, overload, direction) and concluded with a oneitem measure of satisfaction with communication in organization.9 Research has generally measured communication satisfaction and job satisfaction using distinct scales.2,10 However, some research integrates communication satisfaction as a facet of overall job satisfaction. For example, Specter's11 nine-facet job satisfaction measure includes a four-item measure of communication satisfaction, which emphasizes as its referent; a sample item is the goals of this organization are not clear to me (reverse scored). Measuring communication satisfaction as a facet of overall job satisfaction is also consistent with Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire,12 which has a five-item facet called policies and practices. A sample item from this facet is the way employees are informed about company policies. …" @default.
• W6286123 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W6286123 creator A5025183794 @default.
• W6286123 creator A5033018452 @default.
• W6286123 creator A5036405813 @default.
• W6286123 date "2005-01-01" @default.
• W6286123 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W6286123 title "A correlates of peer, supervisor, and patient communication effectiveness satisfaction." @default.
• W6286123 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15839605" @default.
• W6286123 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W6286123 type Work @default.
• W6286123 sameAs 6286123 @default.
• W6286123 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W6286123 countsByYear W62861232015 @default.
• W6286123 countsByYear W62861232016 @default.
• W6286123 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W6286123 hasAuthorship W6286123A5025183794 @default.
• W6286123 hasAuthorship W6286123A5033018452 @default.
• W6286123 hasAuthorship W6286123A5036405813 @default.
• W6286123 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W6286123 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W6286123 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W6286123 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W6286123 hasConcept C198531522 @default.
• W6286123 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W6286123 hasConcept C2718322 @default.
• W6286123 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
• W6286123 hasConcept C2779110517 @default.
• W6286123 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W6286123 hasConcept C47385372 @default.
• W6286123 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W6286123 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
• W6286123 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W6286123 hasConceptScore W6286123C15744967 @default.
• W6286123 hasConceptScore W6286123C159110408 @default.
• W6286123 hasConceptScore W6286123C17744445 @default.
• W6286123 hasConceptScore W6286123C185592680 @default.
• W6286123 hasConceptScore W6286123C198531522 @default.
• W6286123 hasConceptScore W6286123C199539241 @default.
• W6286123 hasConceptScore W6286123C2718322 @default.
• W6286123 hasConceptScore W6286123C2775944032 @default.
• W6286123 hasConceptScore W6286123C2779110517 @default.
• W6286123 hasConceptScore W6286123C43617362 @default.
• W6286123 hasConceptScore W6286123C47385372 @default.
• W6286123 hasConceptScore W6286123C71924100 @default.
• W6286123 hasConceptScore W6286123C75630572 @default.
• W6286123 hasConceptScore W6286123C77805123 @default.
• W6286123 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W6286123 hasLocation W62861231 @default.
• W6286123 hasLocation W62861232 @default.
• W6286123 hasOpenAccess W6286123 @default.
• W6286123 hasPrimaryLocation W62861231 @default.
• W6286123 hasRelatedWork W1748710747 @default.
• W6286123 hasRelatedWork W1929693922 @default.
• W6286123 hasRelatedWork W1963571436 @default.
• W6286123 hasRelatedWork W1983637828 @default.
• W6286123 hasRelatedWork W2044571186 @default.
• W6286123 hasRelatedWork W2045214187 @default.
• W6286123 hasRelatedWork W2065078083 @default.
• W6286123 hasRelatedWork W2080144791 @default.
• W6286123 hasRelatedWork W2082777919 @default.
• W6286123 hasRelatedWork W2139544199 @default.
• W6286123 hasRelatedWork W2268921737 @default.
• W6286123 hasRelatedWork W244862483 @default.
• W6286123 hasRelatedWork W2527976507 @default.
• W6286123 hasRelatedWork W2531749233 @default.
• W6286123 hasRelatedWork W2599589742 @default.
• W6286123 hasRelatedWork W2747210745 @default.
• W6286123 hasRelatedWork W2903665219 @default.
• W6286123 hasRelatedWork W2997249263 @default.
• W6286123 hasRelatedWork W3193571572 @default.
• W6286123 hasRelatedWork W3201701351 @default.
• W6286123 hasVolume "34" @default.
• W6286123 isParatext "false" @default.
• W6286123 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W6286123 magId "6286123" @default.
• W6286123 workType "article" @default.