FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W630145896> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W630145896 abstract "Electronic Stability Program (ESP) aims to prevent the lateral instability of a vehicle. Linked to the braking and powertrain systems, it prevents the car from running wide on a corner or the rear from sliding out. It also helps the driver control his trajectory, without replacing him, in the case of loss of control where the driver is performing an emergency manoeuvre (confused and exaggerated steering wheel actions). A new ESP function optimizes ESP action in curves with hard under steering (situations in which the front wheels lose grip and the vehicle slides towards the outside of the curve). A complementary feature prevents the wheels from spinning when pulling away and accelerating. The name given to the ESP system varies according to the vehicle manufacturer, but other terms include: active stability control (ASC), automotive stability management system (ASMS), dynamic stability control (DSC), vehicle dynamic control (VDC), vehicle stability control (VSC) or electronic stability Control (ESC). This paper proposes an evaluation of the effectiveness of ESP in terms of reduction of injury accidents in France. The method consists of 3 steps: i) The identification, in the French National injury accident census (Gendarmerie Nationale only), of accident-involved cars for which the determination of whether or not the car was fitted with ESP is possible. A sample of 1,356 cars involved in injury accidents occurred in 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003 was then selected. But we had to restrict the analysis to only 588 Renault Lagunas. ii) The identification of accident situations for which we can determine whether or not ESP is pertinent (for example ESP is pertinent for loss of control accidents whilst it is not for cars pulling out of a junction). iii) The calculation, via a logistic regression, of the relative risk of being involved in an ESP-pertinent accident for ESP equipped cars versus unequipped cars, divided by the relative risk of being involved in a non ESP-pertinent accident for ESP equipped cars versus unequipped cars. This relative risk is assumed to be the best estimator of ESP effectiveness. The arguments for such a method, effectiveness indicator and implicit hypothesis are presented and discussed in the paper. Based on a few assumptions, ESP is proved to be highly effective. Currently, the relative risk of being involved in an ESP-pertinent accident for ESP-equipped cars is lower (minus 44 percent, although not statistically significant) than for other cars. (A) Paper to the 1st International ESAR Conference on 3rd/4th September 2004 at Hannover Medical School (Germany), Session: Accident Prevention and Causation - Part II. For the covering abstract see ITRD D355457." @default.
• W630145896 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W630145896 creator A5025081950 @default.
• W630145896 creator A5033505039 @default.
• W630145896 date "2005-01-01" @default.
• W630145896 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W630145896 title "Is ESP effective on French roads" @default.
• W630145896 cites W2000243522 @default.
• W630145896 cites W2075784048 @default.
• W630145896 cites W262898498 @default.
• W630145896 cites W337509709 @default.
• W630145896 cites W611919009 @default.
• W630145896 cites W629804695 @default.
• W630145896 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W630145896 type Work @default.
• W630145896 sameAs 630145896 @default.
• W630145896 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W630145896 countsByYear W6301458962013 @default.
• W630145896 countsByYear W6301458962014 @default.
• W630145896 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W630145896 hasAuthorship W630145896A5025081950 @default.
• W630145896 hasAuthorship W630145896A5033505039 @default.
• W630145896 hasConcept C112972136 @default.
• W630145896 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W630145896 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W630145896 hasConcept C127757376 @default.
• W630145896 hasConcept C171146098 @default.
• W630145896 hasConcept C207269410 @default.
• W630145896 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W630145896 hasConceptScore W630145896C112972136 @default.
• W630145896 hasConceptScore W630145896C119857082 @default.
• W630145896 hasConceptScore W630145896C127413603 @default.
• W630145896 hasConceptScore W630145896C127757376 @default.
• W630145896 hasConceptScore W630145896C171146098 @default.
• W630145896 hasConceptScore W630145896C207269410 @default.
• W630145896 hasConceptScore W630145896C41008148 @default.
• W630145896 hasIssue "55" @default.
• W630145896 hasLocation W6301458961 @default.
• W630145896 hasOpenAccess W630145896 @default.
• W630145896 hasPrimaryLocation W6301458961 @default.
• W630145896 hasRelatedWork W1493790738 @default.
• W630145896 hasRelatedWork W1560602930 @default.
• W630145896 hasRelatedWork W1562489426 @default.
• W630145896 hasRelatedWork W2000243522 @default.
• W630145896 hasRelatedWork W2040199223 @default.
• W630145896 hasRelatedWork W2075784048 @default.
• W630145896 hasRelatedWork W2414422886 @default.
• W630145896 hasRelatedWork W2550415266 @default.
• W630145896 hasRelatedWork W2582743917 @default.
• W630145896 hasRelatedWork W261466770 @default.
• W630145896 hasRelatedWork W2942440076 @default.
• W630145896 hasRelatedWork W309706177 @default.
• W630145896 hasRelatedWork W354117232 @default.
• W630145896 hasRelatedWork W572134088 @default.
• W630145896 hasRelatedWork W587289888 @default.
• W630145896 hasRelatedWork W597881166 @default.
• W630145896 hasRelatedWork W599712517 @default.
• W630145896 hasRelatedWork W655907129 @default.
• W630145896 hasRelatedWork W779728678 @default.
• W630145896 hasRelatedWork W3091977099 @default.
• W630145896 isParatext "false" @default.
• W630145896 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W630145896 magId "630145896" @default.
• W630145896 workType "article" @default.